The Accurate Reloading Forums
Future of 204 Ruger?

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6711043/m/511106547

13 October 2007, 03:09
EMK
Future of 204 Ruger?
I bought a Ruger No 1 last year in 204 Ruger and like the cartridge so much I'd like to get another rifle in the same chambering. However, when I bought the No 1 I worried that in a few years if the cartridge didn't succeed manufactures might drop the cartridge and I'd be stuck with a cartridge for which I couldn't get components. Does anyone have an idea as to how successful the cartridge has been so far? Are they selling enough rifles and ammo to satisfy corporate? Do you think the 204 Ruger will be with us for the long-haul or is it a flash-in-the-pan?
13 October 2007, 03:56
Buglemintoday
I made a similar thread a while back on another forum and it may shine some more light on the subject

http://predatorjunct.proboards43.com/index.cgi?board=am...ay&thread=1180928339


"Let me start off with two words: Made in America"
13 October 2007, 08:07
tuck 2
There are 204 Ruger fans at www.rugerhunting.com The 204 will be around for some time. Is a good round for prairie dog shooting. Last summer I used a Ruger 77 Varmint 204 more than the 223 Rem rifle.


tuck2
14 October 2007, 02:42
MickinColo
The 204 well be around for a while, because it works. It’s the only varmint round that rivals the “Big†22’s for speed and flat shooting without the “pains†of the 17 caliber’s. beer
14 October 2007, 05:56
EMK
Thanks guys.
16 October 2007, 21:35
skb2706
If you are really concerned about it, buy up a large supply of the bullets of choice. The brass can be made from .222 RM, the primers are common stuff and there are several powders that work well in both of mine.
18 October 2007, 19:24
30378
The problem I see with the 17s and 20s is all the other stuff you have to buy once you get the rifle. New smaller diameter cleaning rods, jags, patches, powder funnels, etc. If it is your first smaller caliber you can just about tag another $50 to $100 on to the price of the gun depending on what you feel is necessary. Then if you're like me with big fingers, the bullets are a pain to hang on to.

The 204 is an excellent ctg that will be here a long time.


Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry any firearm. NRA Benefactor
19 October 2007, 04:38
MickinColo
quote:
The problem I see with the 17s and 20s is all the other stuff you have to buy once you get the rifle. New smaller diameter cleaning rods, jags, patches, powder funnels, etc. If it is your first smaller caliber you can just about tag another $50 to $100 on to the price of the gun depending on what you feel is necessary. Then if you're like me with big fingers, the bullets are a pain to hang on to.

The 204 is an excellent ctg that will be here a long time.


Yup, very true. Smiler
23 October 2007, 05:25
mtw
i have read several posts on several boards on this, and most folks say that the 22-250 will outperform, and is the ultimate coyote round. but if you look at hornady ammo ballistics, for the same bullet weights, the 204 will pass it after 200 yards and almost double downrange energy, and a lot less wind drift than any other varmint round. the only advantage i see is the use of 50-60 gr bullets.
23 October 2007, 06:13
MickinColo
There comes a time where the rubber needs to meet the road. If you’re old enough you know what that means.

I’ve been using the 204 for 2 years now and it’s a sweetie. It’s right in there with the big 22s (I shoot a swift and a 22-250).

Read the criticisms all you want, the little 204 is a long-range killer.