The Accurate Reloading Forums
new 788 for me

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6711043/m/4261078611

12 September 2009, 08:06
Fasteel
new 788 for me
Well after reading about the rarity of the 788 in 30-30, I happened upon one here in Canada. Real nice piece of wood, well looked after and accurate/.
Cost me $600.00 canadian dollars

Thanks Greg
12 September 2009, 08:10
N E 450 No2
I have never owned a 788, but I have shot some of my buddies. All of them shot real good.

In your 30/30 try some Hornady Lever Evolution 160gr ammo. It shoots great in my Heym double.

For BIG big game I would use Federal 170gr Nosler Partitions.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
12 September 2009, 09:24
montdoug
Cool Greg! I've yet to see a 788 that didn't shoot. I'm a fan as you know.
Now, let's figure out what we can turn it into Wink.


"If a man buys a rifle at a gun show and his wife doesn't know it"...Did he really buy a rifle?
Firearm Philosophy 101. montdoug
13 September 2009, 05:18
brytstar
About 30+ years ago I bought my sons 788's in 308W, Both shot <MOA out of the box. One cost me $119.00 w/4x Tasco. The other about $30.00 more because son number 2 is left handed. 788's were the best value going but for some unknown reason Remington decided to trash them. You will be more than happy with yours.

BTW, both still shoot <MOA after many, many rounds.


In politics as in theology! "The heart of the wise inclines to the right, But the heart of the fool to the left." Ecclesiastes 10:2
13 September 2009, 22:45
stillbeeman
Remington didn't decide to trash 'em. They were out shooting their 700's. Some of the 788's were made up into winning bench rifles. So Rem decided they were too much of a good thing. I seem to recall paying @$80.00 for my first one.
I took one with a Douglas barrel in .222 and a modified trigger to a bench match. Other than that, it was pretty much stock. I didn't win but then, I didn't lose. I finished kinda in the middle which wasn't appreciated by some of the stool shooters. Smiler
15 September 2009, 06:52
tin can
quote:
Cool Greg! I've yet to see a 788 that didn't shoot.


I'll show you one- got a table leg in .308.

OTOH, I have a blueprinted action that was in 6mm at one time.
15 September 2009, 07:56
montdoug
Re-post of a recent thread, sorry

I just finished this one this summer. I did the stock. A fella I consider a master smith in Colorado single pointed the action, double sleeved and bushed the bolt and re-barreled it with a Kreiger 1 in 12 twist 6MM barrel chambered in 6X47 Lapua (it was a .22-250).
Here's the rifle (old enough to actually have a Walnut stock).



Here's some of the early load development work. 5 shot 100 yard groups.



As I said, I'm a fan Big Grin. Hope your shooting it real soon Amigo!


"If a man buys a rifle at a gun show and his wife doesn't know it"...Did he really buy a rifle?
Firearm Philosophy 101. montdoug
16 September 2009, 10:54
RonE
Rem 788's are a little spendy here too. It is not unusual to see them for $600 USD if they look at all good. My first deer rifle was a 788 in .243. I bough it at the rod and gun club at Fort Hood, Texas. The price for this rifle new without a scope was $67.95. I put a cheapo scope and rings and discovered a rifle as accurate as any I have ever owned.


Don't ask me what happened, when I left Viet Nam, we were winning.
18 September 2009, 07:52
dan belisle
Good rifles, I have them in 22-250, 22-243 Middlestead, 6mm Rem, 6mm-284, and 7mm-08. All are good shooters. - dan


"Intellectual truth is eternally one: moral or sentimental truth is a geographic and chronological accident that varies with the individual" R.F. Burton
19 September 2009, 19:31
DRS
At one time I owned and used a Remington M-788 in .30-30 for hunting Deer here in Ky. I can just KICK myself for letting it get away from me!! homer Received the best handloaded accuracy using WW-748 powder and 125-150 grainers. I mainly used Winchester's 170 grain factory loads for hunting their 170 grain Silvertip Bullet.


David
20 September 2009, 11:39
rembo
quote:
Originally posted by stillbeeman:
Remington didn't decide to trash 'em. They were out shooting their 700's. Some of the 788's were made up into winning bench rifles. So Rem decided they were too much of a good thing


this is just a total COS that 788's lovers like to believe...truth is that it became too expensive to run a separate production line for the 788, afterall it was a lower price point rifle built to compete with the Savage 110 of the day as well as other bolt rifles from Mossberg etc....all the fixturing was different than the 700 etc. etc....it was cheaper from an economies of scale perspective to relegate the 788 to the archives and pull 700's off the line before the polishing stage, give them a quick dip in the blueing tanks and stick them in cheap birch stocks...witness the Model 78 Sportsman.
23 September 2009, 06:19
TEANCUM
My brother in law had one in a 22-250 and shot everything from groundsquirells to deer to antelope to moose when he moved to Alaska. It was the only rifle he had and shot the moose at 75 yards in the head.

It was super accurate and I've looked around for one in a .223 or 22-250 and have yet to come across one. I think people that have them, know what they have and never sell them.
23 September 2009, 20:31
Fasteel
quote:
Originally posted by TEANCUM:
My brother in law had one in a 22-250 and shot everything from groundsquirells to deer to antelope to moose when he moved to Alaska. It was the only rifle he had and shot the moose at 75 yards in the head.

It was super accurate and I've looked around for one in a .223 or 22-250 and have yet to come across one. I think people that have them, know what they have and never sell them.


You should join the Canadian gunnutz, there have been a few 788's for sale there in recent months. A 788 in 22-250 just sold for $395.00 last week. FS
06 October 2009, 01:47
Raftermann USMC
The Rem 788 is an excellent rifle...almost too good out of the box. Much of the time it would outshine the 700's in accuracy. With a little TLC, they can be made to look nice also. The receiver is nearly `benchrest' in ridgitity like an XP-100.
I've never owned one but my friend has a couple (.223 & and .308) and both are sub-MOA rifles and he's done NO modifications to them.


"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of devine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor."