25 July 2016, 10:56
georgeldReckon they have all the business they can handle without hunters?
No wonder they don't want it on the web to be passed around the world like it needs to be.
Thanks for sharing with us, please send it to me by e'mail so I can do my part of spreading the message.
George
26 July 2016, 13:35
malcolmThanks for sharing, My wife's relos are here from France and they want to take back a fallow antler each.
Cheers Malcolm
27 July 2016, 02:09
gryphon1That`s well worth spreading around the world. I fly Emirates and will continue to do so especially in light of this threads news.
28 July 2016, 10:08
HomerOzG'Day Fella's,
Bakes, I read this elsewhere, but Thank You for Sharing!
Looks like Qantas is OFF my Airline list!!!
Doh!
Homer
When they are unwilling to post a fact sheet on this I'd like hear a bit more info on just what the author was attempting to transport that prompted the article. Unless you've done a thorough wrapping job a 35 inch rusa rack attached to a freshly boiled and still wet skull cap isn't something baggage handlers want to touch, whilst a styrofoam box of goose breast from Flinder Island has been a annually shipped item for a number of hunters I know
28 July 2016, 17:26
NitroXAnimal rights extremists inflitrate all sorts of organisations and try to impose their views on others. The fact QANTAS had no written policy or was willing to elaborate clearly their policy shows QANTAS is clearly at fault.
From the sounds of it, they are still hedging their bets and not supplying a clear policy "they have said now they will not carry CITES listed animals."
What does this mean?
A lot of animals are listed on CITES that may be taken. Some with a CITES permit and documentation.
Will some QANTAS berk interpret this as the animal or trophy not being able to be carried? Even if legally importable into Australia????
I'll look carefully at alternative airlines to QANTAS in the future if this PC airlne acts like it does.