The Accurate Reloading Forums
Opinions invited - re scope for a 223
11 September 2015, 17:52
Bren7X64Opinions invited - re scope for a 223
Hi all
I am having a CZ 527 butchered
as follows.
I will then mount a scope on it.
I have - at the moment ....
- Tasco 4-16 - slimmest and lightest and decent optics
- Nikon 4-16 - pretty heavy, fairly decent optics
- Meopta 3-9 - great optics, fairly heavy
What are your ideas?
--
Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
11 September 2015, 19:06
sambarman338I've got a Nikon Monarch 4-16x42 that I used on on a Tikka 270 WSM. The objective is bulky enough but the scope is not over heavy; nice clear optics and a BDC reticle that has good Internet backup.
I would be wary of using it on anything that might get bumped around as I think it lost zero with a moderate bump. Also, I don't like anything that needs constant parallax adjustment, as it tends to get forgotten just when you need it.
12 September 2015, 03:02
BakesWhat are you going to be using the rifle for?
------------------------------
A mate of mine has just told me he's shagging his girlfriend and her twin. I said "How can you tell them apart?" He said "Her brother's got a moustache!"
13 September 2015, 12:01
Bren7X64Well, it's comparatively heavy for a 527 - being the varmint model, so I'll probably get a bipod on it (if not a whole trailer mount as the Soviet ZU-23-2 - I joke, of course).
But it'll probably be used for calling foxes, taking the odd smaller animal and I can see use up to goat size .... probably longer range shooting.
I have a similar 527 (the model with the full stock) that has a 2-7X28 scope on it that is just perfect for walkabout all day.
Both in .223
--
Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
13 September 2015, 12:39
BakesI'd look at something up to 12x myself. That should do everything you need.
http://theopticzone.com/produc...ndplex-matte-120613/
------------------------------
A mate of mine has just told me he's shagging his girlfriend and her twin. I said "How can you tell them apart?" He said "Her brother's got a moustache!"
14 September 2015, 04:43
sambarman338That Windplex reticle is weird, Bakes - no range stadia, just lateral ones. Must be made for Wellington or the Western District

14 September 2015, 10:35
dan_ozI'd use the Meopta, without a moment's hesitation. Great optics will trump merely "decent", and I'd rather have a really sharp image at 9x than one which is not as good, but larger.
For my own use, 9x seems more than enough for any distance I'me going to take a shot with a calibre like .223 too, but YMMV.
14 September 2015, 12:06
muzzaI have found that magnification over 9 is too hard to hold steady when off-hand shooting so anything above that on a carry rifle is wasted. If you are using a rest , bipod, shooting sticks , etc then the game changes and bigger magnification becomes more useable.
________________________
Old enough to know better
14 September 2015, 12:58
Bren7X64The reason my choice rides with one of these three is that's what I have on hand ...
Two of those were buys that looked too good to be true off Fleabay and the Meopta was after I handled one in my LGS.
I was thinking the Meopta - mainly because of the optics, so that's probably what I'll go with.
Thanks for your thoughts.
--
Promise me, when I die, don't let my wife sell my guns for what I told I her I paid for them.
14 September 2015, 15:03
DenisBI'd go with whichever has the better low light optics.
what are you going to use for mounts.
bolt knob clearance can be an issue with a 527 depending on tube & eyepiece diameter.
DIP make some nice light Aluminium mounts for the 527 in 3 heights ( IIRC ) if needed.
I used the high mount with a Minox 4 -20 x50 on my 20VT.
( unfortunately no Oz stockist, ).