The Accurate Reloading Forums
Boeing "Skyfox"

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/558107455/m/3181093872

22 June 2024, 06:56
Bobster
Boeing "Skyfox"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Skyfox

Highly upgraded T-33 project. Ultimately failed to find a market. Looks like it would have been great little plane. Kinda like a stylish A-10 or a souped-up Lear Jet.

https://i0.wp.com/www.zona-mil...fit=1024%2C760&ssl=1
25 June 2024, 22:50
TCLouis
With all of the positive aspects listed, one has to wonder why it failed.

I guess with out all of the advantages of procuring a new design and build with all the associated contract costs it did not meet the normal military purchase requirements



Don't limit your challenges . . .
Challenge your limits


01 July 2024, 06:42
jdollar
Boeing is on a roll. First the 737 Max disaster, doors falling off in flight, etc, and now their Starship is stuck at the ISS. with no projected return date scheduled.its’s already 3 weeks past it’s supposed return date with no end in sight. 2020


Vote Trump- Putin’s best friend…
To quote a former AND CURRENT Trumpiteer - DUMP TRUMP
01 July 2024, 10:15
Cougarz
In reality most projects put forward regardless of the company involved never end up proceeding to production. The military procurement market is a highly movable target.


Roger
___________________________
I'm a trophy hunter - until something better comes along.

*we band of 45-70ers*
02 July 2024, 00:04
Bobster
I agree. When Boeing bought the rights, it may have been them owning it so they could bury it to stifle competition vs a new build they were contemplating. But, on the other hand, Boeing was heavily involved in upgrades to the B-52 and KC-135 over many years. Getting involved in another upgrade would be consistent. Who knows.

Many different types could have been converted including the P-80 series and the Grumman Panther/Cougar series. The latter looking like a much easier upgrade affecting mainly the engines and inlet fairings.

quote:
Originally posted by TCLouis:
With all of the positive aspects listed, one has to wonder why it failed.

I guess with out all of the advantages of procuring a new design and build with all the associated contract costs it did not meet the normal military purchase requirements