The Accurate Reloading Forums
Caliber choices

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/5421043/m/917107401

20 March 2003, 23:34
trb
Caliber choices
I have a R93 in .375 and I�m contemplating getting another barrel. I have another rifle in 7RM and will get a 6,5x55 sometime soon, so what I�m looking for now is something inbetween the. 375 and the 7RM, for deer hunting/plains game maybe and for practising a little more with the R93.

I have narrowed it down to either 8x68S or .300 Weatherby, but I cannot seem to decide. Any opinions? Alternatives among the faster medium/large game category I haven�t thought about?

Appreciate any comments.

Tron
21 March 2003, 00:37
Steve Malinverni
TRB,
I prefer 8x68S, a magnum without belt, but I don't forget .300 WinMag. I don't like Weatherby calibers.

Bye
21 March 2003, 01:12
King Baboon
Balistically 8X68S and 300 wby are very similar. But you will find a wider bullet selection for the .308 than for the 8 mm.
21 March 2003, 09:29
Wachtel
I'd get a 30-06 [Big Grin]
21 March 2003, 09:50
Heritage Arms
I would go with the .300 WBY it will fill the gap well. Loaded with 180 or 220 grs bullets there is very little you could not deal with.

Cheers, Aleko
22 March 2003, 04:36
trb
Tks for replies.

I�m absolutely not open for a .30-06 (everyones got one, besides I want more speed for the heavy bullets)

.300 WM is of course an option, though I reckon the weatherby is slightly more flexible? But again, I have no experience with the weatherbys and worry if it would be accurate enough.

The bullets selection in the .30 calibers tempt me, but the design of the 8x68S is definitely more interesting. Does anyone have an opinion about differencies in performance between these calibers? Do they perform the same or does the 8mm have an advantage? (Probably purely theoretical anyway..)

Tron
22 March 2003, 08:23
<JOHAN>
trb

I will give you a great advice a 300 wby, it has by far a bigger selection of bullets and ammo is easier to find. 8X68 is not alvays soo easy to find in Sweden or Norway and I guess it's much worse in USA.

At least you will have a proper caliber [Big Grin] [Big Grin]

Cheers
Johan

[ 03-22-2003, 14:16: Message edited by: JOHAN ]
27 March 2003, 23:53
Niels
35 Wheelen, 358 Norma Magnum or 9,3x62. Is what I would go for. Speedy calibers do nothing, but damage meat.
Weatherby's and their likes are for shooting Looong range, not for ranges within 300 meters.
But what do I know..
01 April 2003, 01:49
trb
Niels, as I mentioned I have a .375 HH and the .300 barrels is meant for lighter game/a little practising. I think its easier to shoot a lighter caliber well, important if the range is a little longer. I agree that trajectory and speed is not that important. Basically I dont�t need another caliber, I just want it!

Tron
01 April 2003, 17:57
LE270
I have a .300 Weatherby, but my advice would be to get a .300 Winchester mag. Ammo and brass for the Win. mag. is less expensive and more widely available, at least in the US. Although this will depend on the individual rifle, the Winchester mag is also likely to be a bit more accurate. If you handload, you can get perhaps as much as 200 feet per second greater velocity for any bullet weight with the Weatherby, but do you really need it?

[ 04-02-2003, 08:31: Message edited by: LE270 ]
02 April 2003, 09:43
LE270
quote:
Originally posted by JOHAN:
8X68 is not alvays soo easy to find in Sweden or Norway and I guess it's much worse in USA.

Actually, I think it's more or less nonexistent in the US.
02 April 2003, 10:49
Jamt
trb it sounds like a 308NormaMagnum will fit the bill. 300WinMag speed and a longer neck than the Winchester (=long bullets will not trespass the burning room).

[ 04-05-2003, 03:48: Message edited by: Jamt ]
03 April 2003, 02:54
trb
A .308 Norma is probably not an option, since its not on Blasers program of calibers. Avaialbility of brass and ammo is of some interest too, since I hope to use it abroad at some point. The idea of a .300 WM is growing on me...

Tron
03 April 2003, 04:56
LE270
quote:
Originally posted by trb:
A .308 Norma is probably not an option, since its not on Blasers program of calibers. Avaialbility of brass and ammo is of some interest too, since I hope to use it abroad at some point. The idea of a .300 WM is growing on me...

I've never even seen one, much less shot or handled one, but I've read that the .308 Norma Mag. tends to be very accurate. I understand that at one time, before the advent of the 300 Win. mag., many conversions were made for the 308 Norma from 30-06 rifles because the Norma is short enough to work through standard '06-length actions and magazines. But the caliber is extremely obscure now, at least here in the US, and you'd have a difficult time getting brass, let alone loaded ammo, for it. Thus, I'd rule that one out.

[ 04-03-2003, 02:55: Message edited by: LE270 ]
03 April 2003, 05:27
dan belisle
I have 300 Win Mag, 308 Norma Mag, and 300 Wby rifles. For pure power and speed, the Wby wins hands down. It is expensive to feed, however, and due to the long throat (free-bore) accuracy is a sometimes thing. The 300 win Mag has a larger choice of factory ammo at much better prices. As to the 308 Norma, it IS a very accurate round, but ammo selection is limited from the factory, and at least on this side of the pond, ammo costs just about as much as Wby. The 8 X 68S while a good caliber (I'm putting one together right now), doesn't equal the Wby in power or speed, and over here ammo is extremely difficult to find. I would have to say, for most hunters, the 300 Win Mag wins almost by default. FWIW - Dan
21 April 2003, 03:19
N E 450 No2
trb
I have a 300 Win Mag bbl for my Blaser. It shoots real well. I have done quite a bit of hunting with a 300 WBY in the past. There is not that much difference in performance. If you are going to use it for practice and shoot it a lot I would prefer the 300 Win Mag.
21 April 2003, 05:51
308winchester
I think the 8x68S sound like more fun.
Sound a bit more special.

Not a very well founded reason but what the heck.

Johan
22 April 2003, 23:46
trb
Johan, the 8x68S seems to me like more fun too, no logic behind that, its just different.

I think I will go for a .300WM anyway, so I don�t have to change bolt heads when I switch barrels and because of availability of cases and ammunition. Seems like the vote from the other members is undividedly in favour of the Win. compared to the Wheaterby, thanks for the replies!

Tron
23 April 2003, 00:21
b.martins
TRB,

I have 2 R93 rifles: one in 300WM and the other in 9.3x62.
I have used both in Africa for plains game (and the 9.3 in Europe for wild boar and both have always perfomed well.They are realy very accurate.
If your aim is to have a bbl for practicing I believe you would do better with the 300WM: less expensive ammo even if you handload.

B.Martins