The Accurate Reloading Forums
North Fork Solid and Cup Point Solid

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4711043/m/9331050971

07 October 2012, 02:30
lawndart
North Fork Solid and Cup Point Solid
Not enough straight line penetration compared to the FPS.

I have used the Lee sizer dies to Reduce .268" Carcano bullets as much as is needed to fit 6.5x54 M/S bores (which are all over the place). Those work so sweetly and accurately, and they are inexpensive.

See, there is und Gut en der Himmel, and he loves us Smiler.

quote:
That hole through the .510" Lee sizer is precise enough to correct the thinking of GSC.


It will take more than that...


07 October 2012, 17:35
ozhunter
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by ozhunter:
Anyone used the "CUP POINT" bullets on Elephant?
What's the thought on this?


North Fork has recommended against it.

465H&H


Cheers.
08 October 2012, 10:52
Gerard
quote:
That hole through the .510" Lee sizer is precise enough to correct set the thinking of GSC back about 12 years.
Fixed it for you RIP.
08 October 2012, 12:27
buffalo
quote:
Originally posted by Gerard:
quote:
That hole through the .510" Lee sizer is precise enough to correct set the thinking of GSC back about 12 years.
Fixed it for you RIP.


Well Gerard.
I must admit that I ordered .510" dia bullets and got .512" dia.... AND that they are quite difficult to chamber in the (standard) .511" freebore... Confused Frowner
Thats why I gave you the barrel dimensions (.510"/.500") and freeboredia (.511") before ordering... Sad - but I cannot / will not use them for hunting when they impede slick chambering... Frowner Frowner Frowner
08 October 2012, 19:46
RIP
quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
quote:
Originally posted by Gerard:
quote:
That hole through the .510" Lee sizer is precise enough to correct set the thinking of GSC back about 12 years.
Fixed it for you RIP.


Well Gerard.
I must admit that I ordered .510" dia bullets and got .512" dia.... AND that they are quite difficult to chamber in the (standard) .511" freebore... Confused Frowner
Thats why I gave you the barrel dimensions (.510"/.500") and freeboredia (.511") before ordering... Sad - but I cannot / will not use them for hunting when they impede slick chambering... Frowner Frowner Frowner


Yes. Sad.
But they can be used if seated only as deeply as possible. That .512" first band goes into the plus-tolerance-neck length and neck-chamfer area of the chamber.
Then the bands are sized from .512" to .511" as they pass through the PS-free-bore,
then they are sized down to .510" by the time they get to the end of the leade in the throat.
No options on seating depth but that.

Thinking is like that of using cast lead bullets that are +.001" or +.002" over groove size.

I will try to get used to this new way of thinking about monometal copper, drive-banded bullet sizing,
properly done only when the bullet is fired.
08 October 2012, 20:24
capoward
Isn't it interesting - GSC runs +.002" of groove diameter while Barnes typically runs -.001" to -.002" of groove diameter. Certainly is nice when you run into modern CNC monometal bullets that are held to a +/-.0005" or less tolerance.


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
08 October 2012, 21:41
buffalo
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
Isn't it interesting - GSC runs +.002" of groove diameter while Barnes typically runs -.001" to -.002" of groove diameter. Certainly is nice when you run into modern CNC monometal bullets that are held to a +/-.0005" or less tolerance.


+1
09 October 2012, 13:01
ozhunter
Tried some CUP POINTS the other day from my 470 and found that they shoot well with 2grns less powder than my standard WOODLEIGH load.
09 October 2012, 19:45
capoward
quote:
Originally posted by ozhunter:
Tried some CUP POINTS the other day from my 470 and found that they shoot well with 2grns less powder than my standard WOODLEIGH load.
Very good. I've not used either bullet yet but understand the CPS and FPS should take same powder charge and shoot to the same POA/POI. Good luck...


Jim coffee
"Life's hard; it's harder if you're stupid"
John Wayne
09 October 2012, 21:49
465H&H
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
Originally posted by ozhunter:
Tried some CUP POINTS the other day from my 470 and found that they shoot well with 2grns less powder than my standard WOODLEIGH load.
Very good. I've not used either bullet yet but understand the CPS and FPS should take same powder charge and shoot to the same POA/POI. Good luck...



They have for me from my Searcy 470.

465H&H
10 October 2012, 04:11
Pyzda
quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
quote:
Originally posted by Gerard:
quote:
That hole through the .510" Lee sizer is precise enough to correct set the thinking of GSC back about 12 years.
Fixed it for you RIP.


Well Gerard.
I must admit that I ordered .510" dia bullets and got .512" dia.... AND that they are quite difficult to chamber in the (standard) .511" freebore... Confused Frowner
Thats why I gave you the barrel dimensions (.510"/.500") and freeboredia (.511") before ordering... Sad - but I cannot / will not use them for hunting when they impede slick chambering... Frowner Frowner Frowner



I sometimes wonder if we are still talking about hunting bullets.

Pyzda
10 October 2012, 04:30
Marty
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
Originally posted by ozhunter:
Tried some CUP POINTS the other day from my 470 and found that they shoot well with 2grns less powder than my standard WOODLEIGH load.
Very good. I've not used either bullet yet but understand the CPS and FPS should take same powder charge and shoot to the same POA/POI. Good luck...



They have for me from my Searcy 470.

465H&H


Do you mean Woodleigh softs or solids? I load 106gr IMR 4831 under the Woodleigh softs, and 104gr under the solids now. I am about to start experimenting with North Forks in my 470, and am just looking for a preview.
10 October 2012, 11:07
ozhunter
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:


Do you mean Woodleigh softs or solids? I load 106gr IMR 4831 under the Woodleigh softs, and 104gr under the solids now. I am about to start experimenting with North Forks in my 470, and am just looking for a preview.


My standard load is 94grns of AR2209 with filler (sold in the USA as Hogden powder) behind Woodleigh Softs and FMJ's.
10 October 2012, 19:46
465H&H
quote:
Originally posted by Marty:
quote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
quote:
Originally posted by capoward:
quote:
Originally posted by ozhunter:
Tried some CUP POINTS the other day from my 470 and found that they shoot well with 2grns less powder than my standard WOODLEIGH load.
Very good. I've not used either bullet yet but understand the CPS and FPS should take same powder charge and shoot to the same POA/POI. Good luck...



They have for me from my Searcy 470.

465H&H


Do you mean Woodleigh softs or solids? I load 106gr IMR 4831 under the Woodleigh softs, and 104gr under the solids now. I am about to start experimenting with North Forks in my 470, and am just looking for a preview.


In both my 465 and 470 doubles all bullets I listed plus the CEB#13 shoot to 2" groups at 50 yards with the same powder charge. 110 grains of H-4831 or 106 grains of IMR-4831.

465H&H
15 October 2012, 05:43
Antlers
quote:
Originally posted by buffalo:
quote:
Originally posted by Gerard:
quote:
That hole through the .510" Lee sizer is precise enough to correct set the thinking of GSC back about 12 years.
Fixed it for you RIP.


Well Gerard.
I must admit that I ordered .510" dia bullets and got .512" dia.... AND that they are quite difficult to chamber in the (standard) .511" freebore... Confused Frowner
Thats why I gave you the barrel dimensions (.510"/.500") and freeboredia (.511") before ordering... Sad - but I cannot / will not use them for hunting when they impede slick chambering... Frowner Frowner Frowner


Hmmm...no response?


Antlers
Double Rifle Shooters Society
Heym 450/400 3"
23 October 2012, 00:48
buffalo
I'm also waiting..............