The Accurate Reloading Forums
RUGER M77 MK II SAFARI MAG 375 H&H vs Belgium Browining Safari 458 win

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4711043/m/837101746

27 March 2007, 09:39
Dr B
RUGER M77 MK II SAFARI MAG 375 H&H vs Belgium Browining Safari 458 win
I just bought both of these rifles, at a great price. I think I'm going to sell one. Putting every thing aside except quality of the rifle. Which one you keep and why?
Dr B
27 March 2007, 09:52
idahoelk101
Browning if it is the FN action cause I can get another ruger, they dont make the browning anymore
27 March 2007, 20:59
Mikelravy
What idahoak said. I think the Ruger is too big and heavy for a 375 anyway.
27 March 2007, 21:40
dean119
I'd shoot them both and go with the one that feels best. I like my FN safari 458. It handles and shoots great. I never owned a ruger 375 but the ones I picked up seemed clunky and too heavy to me. The 375 may be more versatile but with a lighter, better BC bullet like the 450 grain Swift at 2200 fps, the 458 gives up little practical range to the 375, and it makes a reasonable all around rifle.
28 March 2007, 00:26
N E 450 No2
I would keep the Browning 458.

Even if I wasnot going to Africa, I would load it down with 350/400gr bullets and us it for deer, pigs, and elk/black bear in the thick.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
28 March 2007, 07:46
458RugerNo1
quote:
Even if I wasnot going to Africa, I would load it down with 350/400gr bullets and us it for deer, pigs, and elk/black bear in the thick.


Amen! It's an excellent round for short to medium range brush/timber conditions. A good 400gr bullet at about 2000 fps is hard to beat for anything in NA.

PS: I've hade my RSM in .375 for about 3 yrs now and love it dearly. It's a spectacular rifle in every way, but I do wish it was about A POUND OR SO LIGHTER!


.22 LR Ruger M77/22
30-06 Ruger M77/MkII
.375 H&H Ruger RSM
28 March 2007, 08:47
luv2safari
458 Browning...

Exactly why I sold my RSMs...too heavy! They are excellent rifles for the money, but need trimming down some...far too heavy for a 375, IMO.

Keep the Browning. They are Classics and beautifully done.
28 March 2007, 09:20
ForrestB
Sell the FN and keep the Ruger. Everyone should go through life with at least one major regret.


______________________________
"Truth is the daughter of time."
Francis Bacon
28 March 2007, 20:58
Mikelravy
Too bad the Browning wasn't in 375 and the Ruger in 458. That would be just about an ideal combo to me.
29 March 2007, 08:40
gumboot458
...Keep them both ,, but if you can,t keep the 458..A friend of mine had one ..He worked up a load with 400 gr Barnes Originals at 2400 fps ........It was nice and light and easy to shoot well...........It just crumpled up big bears....


.If it can,t be grown , its gotta be mined ....
30 March 2007, 19:53
HiWall
I wouldn't have bought the Browning in the first place. They are the ones that killed off the M70 & 94, just to get rid of the competition for their push feed POS rifles under the Browning name, that they make cheap in China or Taiwan or some other god forsaken hole of a country.
30 March 2007, 20:56
Roland1
If it is a Belgian Browning it's a keeper.

Roland
30 March 2007, 22:24
Mikelravy
HiWall Your chronology is suspect. These were made long before any of the events you referred to allegedly occurred.