[This message has been edited by 500grains (edited 10-11-2001).]
If you don't want to open the action up and have to buy new bottom metal, then go with the 338 case necked up to 416 or 423...
------------------
Ray Atkinson
585 Nyati
500 Jeffery
460 G&A
416 Howell
425 Westley Richards
404 Jeffery
The last three are pretty much the same ballistically. The 585 and 500 will require considerable magazine and bolt work.
Todd E
You got me with the 585 Nyati. But, the 460 G&A is the full length 404, and needs a mag length action, the 450 G&A uses the shortened 404 case.
Also, considering the belt diameter of the H&H case, I'd consider either the 458 win mag or the 450 G&A to require rail and magazene work, and while you're at it, you might as well use a case big enough to justify the 45 bore. I think 416 is biggest practicle caliber in the 2.5" belted cases.
You caught me. I was thinking of the 460 A-Square, which is based on a 2.5" case. Another possibility would be the 458 Lott or the 470 Capstick. These two will stretch it to the limit lengthwise. I think that the 495 A-Square might work as well, but I am not sure without looking it up.
Todd E
The 458 Winchester would be the simplest, but it has it's detractors... but not me with my hand loads.
The best alternative would be the 450 Vincent Short, in Saeed's reloading pages, created by Saeed and Roy Vincent. It is a shortened 404 case necked up to 458, with the idea of use in rechambering of standard 458 Winchester rifles.
To get three rounds in the magazine with this cartridge would not be difficult. Only a reworked follower and windowed magazine walls and no other changes to the box. No stock or bottom metal changes otherwise.
------------------
Good huntin', shootin', and spear chuckin',
RAB
The 450 vincent short is essentially a 450 G&A, or 458 HRH, depending on how you look at it.
Last time I talked to John, it sounded like he might finish the 458 HRH before the 500 Jeffrey, though then that has me trying to figure out dies.
------------------
Good huntin', shootin', and spear chuckin',
RAB
------------------
Ray Atkinson
What does blackburn charge for that bottom metal? The gun is a 8.25lbs .458 - If I kept the barrel contour the same in a .404 it would be a bit more heavy -which is needed. and the 404 would kick less - which is needed. This is what I have been thinking since I started the post..
I have heard that you need a VERY good gunsmith for the .404 to feed correctly. Is this true?
Aaron
I am not Ray, but if your rifle is already a 458 Win Mag you shouldn't need to do much other than rebarrel it. 404 Jeffery's feed very nicely by design and therefore are somewhat idiot proof. This is due to the long gentle slope of the shoulder. You may need to modify the follower a bit but I should think that would be the extent of any "serious" modifications.
Todd E
But the 450 Vincent Short/458 HRH still fits your initial proposition better.
I would rather have one of these by rechambering an existing 458 Winchester. Bullet versatility and availability, and bigger holes, if you want "whomp" in a short magnum. The full length 404 will require some opening up of the action for sure, as Ray advises, to the rear.
------------------
Good huntin', shootin', and spear chuckin',
RAB
To convert to 404 you need a qualified gunsmith that is familiar with doing that work for sure, as some rail work will be required either adding to or subtracting as required to have PERFECT feeding and extraction, the number 1 priority for DGR's.....but to simplify the procedure use the original specs by Jeffery and tune from there.....
------------------
Ray Atkinson