The Accurate Reloading Forums
Further on OVERBORE

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/4711043/m/5311093631

16 July 2010, 09:38
BigFiveJack
Further on OVERBORE
Here's the follow up question. Does the shorter and fatter case that holds a given amount
of water slow barrel wear more than a taller slimmer case of the same capacity? I've heard
time and again the short fat case is more efficient compared to the tall slim case. But is there
a difference in damage caused to barrels?
Confused

The REM 300 SAUM and the 375 RUM both do very well with the math formula provided by a
poster in the earlier thread that I started on the OVERBORE topic. In other words they come
very close to maxing out on case capacity compared to barrel life.

Link to earlier thread: http://forums.accuratereloadin...4711043/m/8841070531

From 10th post of above thread: Case capacity in grains of water divided by the area (in
square inches) of the bore cross-section. This gives an index number, anything over 1000
is Overbore and will tend to be hard on barrels.




Jack

OH GOD! {Seriously, we need the help.}

16 July 2010, 11:15
J.D.Randell
Comes down to velocity and heat of the gases in the bore. Shorter/fatter tends to heat up more than longer. Also, necking down heats up the gas and increases velocity.