The Accurate Reloading Forums
.425 WR---Why isn't it popular?
17 June 2003, 05:11
Tom Kessel.425 WR---Why isn't it popular?
It produces more speed and energy than the 458, built on a short action, and a classic calibre!!!
17 June 2003, 05:29
500grainsRebated rim, if I am not mistaken.
17 June 2003, 05:34
<Axel>I believe 500grains has it right. The rebated rim would not be such a BIG issue in a PF rifle with inline feeding from the magazine, though!!!
Axel
17 June 2003, 07:55
RobgunbuilderRebated rims are not an issue with CRF rifles with in-line feeding systems either! To make a rebated rim work properly from a std staggered magazine box takes a talented gunsmith! Most Hacks will fail on this test!-Rob
17 June 2003, 08:29
carcano91Has been resurrected.
Is called .45 Blaser now.
See the search function of these boards.
Carcano
17 June 2003, 10:42
Tom KesselI had a custom mauser sever years back and it worked great--but--I didn't know whatwork went into the gun for proper feeding etc..
TOM
17 June 2003, 11:38
<Axel>Robgunbuilder, I agree. BTW, when did you move to Lost Wages! How do you like living there? Is it better than the Bay area?
Axel
17 June 2003, 12:01
bluetickI think for one reason it was not popular is because it was designed to easily and
affordably convert old rifles with a 30-06/8mm bolt face into a dangerous game rifle. This in some peoples mind also equals cheap. That was a hard stigma for the cartridge to get over. From what I have been told it is not all that hard to get to feed in a CRF action. Although I have not seen or done it first hand. Sounds like a good next project though.
As for today until recently brass has been hard to find and of poor quality.
17 June 2003, 12:49
OldsargeWell, you
could turn down the rim on .404 brass and reform. Frankly, there isn't any particular point to it these days. Now that double square bridge actions are available at a (relatively) reasonable price, why get a .425 WR when you can have a .416 Rigby? And since .375 length actions are easy to come by, why go through all the hoops of building a .425 when you can have a .416 Rem or a .400 H&H? WR made a big mistake when they kept the cartridge propriatory. Anything the .425 could do, the .404 could do cheaper . . .
including being built on a standard length action. Today, its only appeal is oddity, though that's plenty good enough for many of us!
17 June 2003, 17:56
<the-moleman>As Oldsarge mentioned you can make brass from .404 Jeffery.
Jack Lott used a different bolt in his rifle with the "magnum" .532" dia face and formed brass from .404 cases and called it .425 Lott if I remember correctly. It eliminated potential problems with feeding, but still allowed 5 rounds in the magazine of his original W-R rifle. He couldn't use stripper clips though, which was the primary advantage of the .425 W-R.
Kurt
23 June 2003, 13:50
AtkinsonThe 425 was born a bastard and died a bastard...a non functional, poorly designed and useless cartridge...
A 404, 416 and a host of other cartridges will duplicate it balistics..If I had hone I would simply rebarrel it to something simular...
Even the poor little 10.75x68 is a better bet than the .425 WR, in fact the 10.75 x68 with modern brass and bullets is a neat little Buffalo/Lion gun...and now Huntington has brass for it....
Careful ray..... you know where this leads.....
![[Big Grin]](images/icons/grin.gif)
25 June 2003, 01:10
mehulkamdarI guess ALf could answer this better than anyone else here with his encyclopedic knowledge of the hunting scene in Africa, but I think I read somewhere that the .425 WR was the standard game department issue caliber in Uganda for many years.
I don't know if my memory remembers right, and, even if it does, whether the Ugandans really issued the .425 - it would be interesting to know of their experience with it if they did use it that extensively!
25 June 2003, 23:02
mehulkamdarALF,
Thanks - I knew I'd get a brilliant response from you.
Good shooting!
10 July 2003, 04:26
OldsargeDamn, ALF,
Only 30-40 rifles for PAC by the game departments? I had visions of several hundred. No wonder so few "classic" Africans show up at the SCI convention booths. That is a very interesting batch of data you release and puts a whole different perspective on the subject. It also makes my .318 by Greener seem like a much rarer bird than I originally thought. See if I ever part with it now! Isn't it amazing what you can find out when you start to ask for quantifiable information?
Cheers,