The Accurate Reloading Forums
Ruger No. 1 in .450 NE
12 February 2002, 19:20
Bill/OregonRuger No. 1 in .450 NE
Well, put the first 10 rounds through the reamed .458 Tropical. Mighty sketchy first impressions, but: 480-grain cast bullet over 120 grains Goex FFg gave about 1390 fps and mild recoil; 480-grain cast over 50 grains XMP-5744 gave nice accuracy, noticeable recoil off the bench, and probably around 1700, but the chrono was acting up. I only fired three rounds (offhand) of "classic" NE: 82 grains Re15 lit by a Federal 215 in Bertram brass under a Hornady 500-grain JSP. If ever recoil was a shove versus a kick, this was it. I found myself taking a step back, but otherwise the round isn't nearly so punishing as a light .338, or a hot-loaded Speer 400 in a Marlin .45-70. And it think it wants to be damned accurate. I'll post again when I have a larger sample.
12 February 2002, 22:46
aHunterFor working up loads, and for the fun of it, I looked at such a combo, too. Just look at the .450 thread from daydreamer.
Please keep us posted about your loading results. The classic weight would be 480 grs. GS has 450 grs, too. I would be interested in a full power load with 480�s and a corresponding load with same muzzle vel with a 350 grs Hornady IL ( same barrel time for a double).
Did you rent the reamer? What brass do you use?
Keep up the work! Hermann
------------------
13 February 2002, 06:20
Bill/OregonHermann: Yes, my smith rented the reamer from
www.reamerrentals.com and I have both HDS and Bertram brass. The HDS is just a bit wide at the base, and I am having trouble swaging it all the way down with the RCBS dies, but the Bertram is working fine so far.
13 February 2002, 07:00
WachtelGood to hear that the new rifle seems to be working out well! What is the weight of your rifle? I've heard different weight numbers for the 1-H, from below 9 to over 10 pounds. Interested to hear more

[This message has been edited by Wachtel (edited 02-12-2002).]
13 February 2002, 09:05
fla3006I look forward to reading more about various loads for this combination. The 450 or 450 No.2 seems like one of the more versatile big bore rounds from a handloader's standpoint, and the Ruger No.1 458 seems like a relatively easy and inexpensive conversion. This is gonna be my next project too.
13 February 2002, 10:33
Bill/OregonWachtel: The No. 1 .450 with Burris signature mounts and an old steel Weaver K2.5 scope weighs about 10 pounds, four ounces.
14 February 2002, 03:24
CGBI see that there are two rim thicknesses listed for the .450 N.E. Is there a 'standard'? Also, Mast (BeLL) lists cases in both; is their brass available or do you have to wait into the next century for them to run off a lot?
C.G.B.
14 February 2002, 08:38
Bill/OregonI am using the .040 rim. I got both Bertram and HDS (by Bell) from huntingtons.com.
15 February 2002, 06:35
MacD37Bill, I may have ask you this already, I'm getting old and the memory goes first, but who did the work on your No1?
------------------
..Mac >>>===(x)===>
also DUGABOY1
DUGABOY DESIGNS
Collector/trader of fine double rifles, and African wildlife art
15 February 2002, 09:22
Bill/OregonMac: The smith who did the reaming was Kevin Wyatt here in Medford, OR.
He's at
www.wyattsoutdoor.com16 February 2002, 03:12
MacD37Thanks Bill, I'll fire off an E-mail to him. I have a rare No1V factory chambered for 7mm Rem Mag, and only a few of these were so chambered. The heavy varment barrel is .700 diameter at muzzle, and 24" long. I would like this barrel re-bored, and chambered for 500/416NE. With a set of good Ironsights, and barrel band front sling swivel, from NECG, and a Pachmeyr Decelarator pad, would make a very nice rifle. The Ruger is a collector item, but I have several 7mm Rem Mag rifles, and simply do not use this rifle. Re-done to 500/416NE seems a little more to my likeing.
------------------
..Mac >>>===(x)===>
also DUGABOY1
DUGABOY DESIGNS
Collector/trader of fine double rifles, and African wildlife art
27 February 2002, 10:10
fla3006You talked me into it. I just bought a pre-warning 458 with a custom maple stock off GunBroker.com. Next step is to get the chamber reamed to 450, reshape and rechecker the stock and add a new quarter rib and some classy express sights. Can't wait!
27 February 2002, 10:46
GeorgeSMac,
Why not re-barrel? Re-boring still leaves you with a Ruger barrel of dubious quality.
A good barrel will cost a little more than a re-bore and will be available a LOT sooner.
George
------------------
Shoot straight, shoot often, but by all means, use enough gun!
27 February 2002, 13:38
Bill/OregonI rechambered the .458 to .450 3.25 NE because it cost me well under $175, and in my experience, the barrels on the big-bore Ruger No. 1s are capable of very nice accuracy. At least that has been the case with the .458 and a .416 Rigby. Rebarreling is more like $500 these days ... Now ask me about the barrel on an early Ruger M77 in 7X57, and I will tell you horror stories ...
27 February 2002, 22:07
aHunterI would consider rechambering to keep the quarter rib and the open sights.
H
------------------