13 May 2007, 06:32
D HumbargerExactly what are you testing?
Photo quality, GD .....
What do you think? Critique?!!
13 May 2007, 16:18
TailgunnerNot a box collector, but I'd rate the 250Savage box "fair" at best, the other 2 are in "poor" condition.
Value for the cartridges themselves, maybe $1 each for the savage, perhaps $.25 each for the shotshells.
13 May 2007, 19:41
D Humbargerquote:
Photo quality, GD .....
What do you think? Critique?!!
What camera are you useing? Digital or film?
If possible try useing a slower shutter speed, no slower that 1/60 though, unless useing a tripod. By doing that you will be able to use a higher F stop (F/16 or F/32) & thereby increase the depth of field. Focus 1/3 of the way into what you want to be in focus. Notice that in your first & third photos the cartridge & shotgun shell arn't as sharp as the box's & the background. Thats due to a shallow depth of field. hope this helps a bit.
quote:
Originally posted by Tailgunner:
Not a box collector, but I'd rate the 250Savage box "fair" at best, the other 2 are in "poor" condition.
Value for the cartridges themselves, maybe $1 each for the savage, perhaps $.25 each for the shotshells.
Thanks for the info, Tailgunner.
I'm not a serious cartridge collector (as you can probably tell). These were just given to me(most of the boxes are full).
I was doing my annual spring inventory/cleanup had my digital camera set up on my desk, so decided to shoot them.
quote:
What camera are you useing? Digital or film?
Digital Nikon COOLPIX 3100.
quote:
If possible try useing a slower shutter speed, no slower that 1/60 though, unless useing a tripod. By doing that you will be able to use a higher F stop (F/16 or F/32) & thereby increase the depth of field. Focus 1/3 of the way into what you want to be in focus. Notice that in your first & third photos the cartridge & shotgun shell arn't as sharp as the box's & the background. Thats due to a shallow depth of field. hope this helps a bit.
Thanks, GD. That does help.