Fired Epstein and Maxwell Prosecutor, Maurene Comey, just issued this following statement:

"Yesterday was unexpectedly my last day in the Office. I was summarily fired via memo from Main Justice that did not give a reason for my termination.

Every person lucky enough to work in this office constantly hears four words to describe our ethos: Without Fear or Favor. Do the right thing, the right way, for the right reasons without fear of retribution and without favor to the powerful.

For the majority of my nearly ten years in SDNY, the hard part seemed to be acting “without favor.” That is, making sure people with access, money, and power were not treated differently than anyone else; and making sure this office remained separate from politics and focused only on the facts and the law. Fear was never really conceivable. We don’t fear bad press; we have the luxury of exceptional security keeping us physically safe; and, so long as we did our work with integrity, we would get to keep serving the public in this office.

But we have entered a new phase where “without fear” may be the challenge. If a career prosecutor can be fired without reason, fear may seep into the decisions of those who remain. Do not let that happen. Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought. Instead of fear, let this moment fuel the fire that already burns at the heart of this place. A fire of righteous indignation at abuses of power. Of commitment to seek justice for victims. Of dedication to truth above all else.

It has been an honor to fight for those principles by your side.

IBM fired 8,000 due to strategy change... are you going to take and post a statement from each?

I’d have bet good money you’d be right here to defend your Messiah.

I’d bet equal money you didn’t (or couldn’t) read it.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
IBM fired 8,000 due to strategy change... are you going to take and post a statement from each?

I guess they all weren't "LOYAL EH?" JMFCOAPS!

And NONE of them were politically motivated.

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I’d have bet good money you’d be right here to defend your Messiah.

I’d bet equal money you didn’t (or couldn’t) read it.

Yep, for a Dump Trumper, jeffe has come a long way- backward. He has become Cheeto Man’s primary defender here.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
IBM fired 8,000 due to strategy change... are you going to take and post a statement from each?

Orange growing season is longer than Apple growing season. Are apples being discriminated against? Maybe we should ask them. All of them. You are the king of false equivalences.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I’d have bet good money you’d be right here to defend your Messiah.

I’d bet equal money you didn’t (or couldn’t) read it.

Yep, for a Dump Trumper, jeffe has come a long way- backward. He has become Cheeto Man’s primary defender here.

Okay, jd, where did i defend trump?

Jimmy Carter, the last good thing to come out of Georgia

America has become ORANGE FUCKWIT INCORPORATED

You know she had it coming
Nothing lasts forever

A nepotism baby gets canned because her family member (father) was against the guy who got into power?

You can't tell me that there are not more lawyers out there who could not have done the job she did every bit as well as she did.

BS that there is not politics involved in the SDNY prosecutors office. If anything, the SDNY is something of a political office with all the high profile stuff that goes on there.

She is the first person who prosecuted a prostitution ring who couldn't produce a single client but was able to put the madam of the whorehouse in prison. I guess that is some kind of talent.

Clients were Comeys buddies is why

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I’d have bet good money you’d be right here to defend your Messiah.

I’d bet equal money you didn’t (or couldn’t) read it.

Yep, for a Dump Trumper, jeffe has come a long way- backward. He has become Cheeto Man’s primary defender here.

Okay, jd, where did i defend trump?

Jimmy Carter, the last good thing to come out of Georgia

Surely you aren’t serious. Where did you defend Trump? Really? There must be a punch line to that joke somewhere here….

Possibly the most unaware poster on all of the internet, certainly the smallest.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:

quote:

Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I’d have bet good money you’d be right here to defend your Messiah.

I’d bet equal money you didn’t (or couldn’t) read it.

Yep, for a Dump Trumper, jeffe has come a long way- backward. He has become Cheeto Man’s primary defender here.

Since you seem compelled to dodge, right here

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
IBM fired 8,000 due to strategy change... are you going to take and post a statement from each?

Where do you see support for trump?

I'm firing 8k people under trump isnt praise of trump
Asking a poster if they going to do the same for 8k other people impacted in 2025.. yep, no mention of trump

Oh, by not sky screaming about an American noble class scion loosing her job, is that supporting trump?

Just breathing with being in a constant state of rage that trump is president? Goodness me..

I don't get all or nothing thinking. You do you boo

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:


I don't get all or nothing thinking.

Hard to tell that from your posts Honey.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
IBM fired 8,000 due to strategy change... are you going to take and post a statement from each?

These two situations are nothing alike. Your attempt to present them as similar is his you defend the Regime’s s goons to folks.


This makes the similarities folks being fired unrelated.

. If a career prosecutor can be fired without reason, fear may seep into the decisions of those who remain. Do not let that happen. Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought. Instead of fear, let this moment fuel the fire that already burns at the heart of this place. A fire of righteous indignation at abuses of power. Of commitment to seek justice for victims. Of dedication to truth above all else.


The reason she is being fired now is she sought to prosecute Epstein. That prosecution has caused President Trump political and personal embarrassment of his own making. That embarrassment is why she is fired. It is no way to run a government. Especially, no way to run the law enforcement subunit of government.

You know, that is what wannabe tyrants do if you want to talk about subjects and kings.

She secured the ethical conviction of Maxwell to serious time. Her job performance has been professional and successful.

Cute. Didn't ask for an analysis of the difference. I asked for how this supports trump. Oh, and you weren't asked, as it wasn't your challenge being answered

No typos, good job

Feeble.

Your original post supports Trump by making an unrelated comparison in attempt to justify, explain, and ultimately that is support of the actions of the Regime.

You are taking two things that are unrelated. Stating them Ed being similar in order to justify, support, give cover to the President’ indefensible action. Well, the action is defensible because you did.

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
A nepotism baby gets canned because her family member (father) was against the guy who got into power?

You can't tell me that there are not more lawyers out there who could not have done the job she did every bit as well as she did.

BS that there is not politics involved in the SDNY prosecutors office. If anything, the SDNY is something of a political office with all the high profile stuff that goes on there.

She is the first person who prosecuted a prostitution ring who couldn't produce a single client but was able to put the madam of the whorehouse in prison. I guess that is some kind of talent.

It just never ceases to amaze what the trumptards are willing to try to defend. Anything that their orange messiah does, no matter how illegal, unethical, stupid or outrageous it is, they are right there with him.

Comey graduated from Harvard Law School. Worked at a very prestigious law firm. Clerked for a federal judge. Was hired to work as a federal ADA by the US DOJ in 2016.

She's got chops and credibility. She was fired because trump is a tiny little man who bully's the families of his enemies.

And, doc...you are pathetic for defending it. And, it surprises me to see that you think you've got the experience or base of knowledge to offer any of those criticisms. You don't.

I bet that even when trump takes a shit it's politically motivated.

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Feeble.

Your original post supports Trump by making an unrelated comparison in attempt to justify, explain, and ultimately that is support of the actions of the Regime.

You are taking two things that are unrelated. Stating them Ed being similar in order to justify, support, give cover to the President’ indefensible action. Well, the action is defensible because you did.

Nope. Not a single word in my post did anything that. I asked if he would be taking and posting statements from those 8k... didnt make a single comparative statement

Primary facia

It's a right there. That others took this. With their bias and preconceptions... well, nothing I can do for it

Not a single word I said supported or decried ms comey being terminated

And trust me, the 8k laid off from IBM, on average, have nothing like the safety net she does. Their stories are important too, and they are techies, close to my heart.

Swing and a miss

Yep, swing and a miss alright.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
Yep, swing and a miss alright.

Not even going to try and justify your accusation? Big wiff of a miss.

Do better

Amazon Web Services has some layoffs https://share.google/FppUiTf5UWZcPxJNc
Was has layed off over 27k since 2022.. taking statements from them?

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:

quote:

Originally posted by LHeym500:
Feeble.

Your original post supports Trump by making an unrelated comparison in attempt to justify, explain, and ultimately that is support of the actions of the Regime.

You are taking two things that are unrelated. Stating them Ed being similar in order to justify, support, give cover to the President’ indefensible action. Well, the action is defensible because you did.

Nope. Not a single word in my post did anything that. I asked if he would be taking and posting statements from those 8k... didnt make a single comparative statement

Primary facia

It's a right there. That others took this. With their bias and preconceptions... well, nothing I can do for it

Not a single word I said supported or decried ms comey being terminated

And trust me, the 8k laid off from IBM, on average, have nothing like the safety net she does. Their stories are important too, and they are techies, close to my heart.

Swing and a miss

We all see that you are funding. It is exactly what I described. See Jr.

You don’t get to respond to a pilot do during w non political firings in the public sector dnd not be comparing them.


You can say no all you want hog have.

It is your new mo.

I’m not defending Trump while you present argument they defends him.

Little proof reading?

I want to read your post but wow

Fun story
When I was in college, kurt vonnegut was on campus, and was invited around. I wasn't present for this, but reported in the campus paper was an interesting exchange. There was a lecture hall, where a PhD English professor was pontificating on his work, saying he meant all kinds of things in KVs writing. Reading in, regurgitate through the profs lens, stating all kinds of things...

KV allegedly stood up, said the author didnt say or mean any of those things.

The indignant PhD demanded to know his name, as he would be going to the dean for his disrespect

KV said "how do I know, I only wrote it... and my name is Kurt Vonnegut"

Wish I had been there, as i had been to his campus speech. That was hysterical

Okay. I deciphered part of that. I didnt present ANY arguement. Prima facia. But if you can judge mense rea from a thousand miles away and never have met me, well, thats an amazing skill. You should be chief justice of the thought crime police

And not a single soul outside of his household cried when my former boss was fired ... and fired for good reason

When Jamie Dimon was fired from Citigroup, his daughters asked: 'Will we be homeless? Can I still go to college? Can I have your phone?' | Fortune https://share.google/Ix6KVZbFkqhevG5g4

quote:

Originally posted by crbutler:
A nepotism baby gets canned because her family member (father) was against the guy who got into power?

You can't tell me that there are not more lawyers out there who could not have done the job she did every bit as well as she did.

BS that there is not politics involved in the SDNY prosecutors office. If anything, the SDNY is something of a political office with all the high profile stuff that goes on there.

She is the first person who prosecuted a prostitution ring who couldn't produce a single client but was able to put the madam of the whorehouse in prison. I guess that is some kind of talent.

I've never seen you make a post that was completely full of shit...until now.

Yep. Full of shit. A Harvard educated lawyer with years of experience is hardly a nepotism baby. Pitiful deflection.

Trump has always dealt with negative press by simply saying it was fake news and there was nothing to it. This regardless of evidence. His followers have let him get away with it because they had to. Now, it seems like a large segment have finally come face to face with the fact that their hero has used them and lied to them. The flip-flop required of them in the case of the Epstein affair seems to be a maneuver many of them just can't manage.
Interestingly, Democrats have managed to go from a "nothing to see here" stance to a "we need to investigate. This is a fairly advanced gymnastic move too.
On the surface, Ms. Comey's firing seems to be politically motivated, and nothing else. In this regard, it may not be exactly the same as IBM lay-offs or Amazon lay-offs.
LHeym500,
For chrissakes, do you not have a spelling and grammar app on your damned phone? Your posts are like a word game. The object is to try and guess what you really meant. Regards, Bill.

quote:

Originally posted by jdollar:
Yep. Full of shit. A Harvard educated lawyer with years of experience is hardly a nepotism baby. Pitiful deflection.

Who successfully prosecuted this matter obtaining a long prison term for Epstein’s co-defendant.


I guess anyone who wants and follows in their father’s career footsteps is a nepobaby. I wonder if that same logic applies to doctors?

I am not going back on this cell phone snd correcting out Corte ts. I have better theings to do.


I will retype.

Jeff has taken two completely different factual scenarios the political firing of this Fed Prosecutor and the firings at a private company IBM. He has presented those firings as similar in response to the prosecutor’s firing, “ X amount of people fired at IBM and no one says anything.”

Why would we say anything about IBM? IBM’s sittings are from the private sector. There is no reporting of malfeasance in IBM firings. You have alleged none. Thus, we are safe in making a reasonable inference that IBN’s firings are based on economics. I wonder if Trumpnomics has anything to do w that? Regrettable, but perfectly above board.

However, the prosecutor’s firing is of a front line public servant. A front line public servant whose firing corresponds with the President’s embarrassment and political fallout over Epstein.

This prosecutor did nothing but seek ethical prosecution of crime. She obtained serious conviction and prison term for Epstein’s co-defendant. Epstein kills himself in custody. This firing is the result of her brining the Epstein crime to the popular knowledge through her professional and ethical prosecution. Never mind, the Regime created the political controversy by indulging in conspiracy theories and grand promises during the campaign and transition.

Therefore, to juxtapose IBM firings with this firing in a discussion about the firing of the prosecutor who brought the sex trafficking of minor cases is argument in support of the Regime’s action.


Why else bring up a completely different, and unrelated factual scenario. A scenario you present as being similar.

There is no reason to mention IBM in this context, discussion. Other then to get folks to draw the conclusion that the prosecutor being fired is just business as usual, above board economics like IBM.

Cut jeffe some slack. He can’t help that all that koolaid has softened his brain. Defending Cheeto Man is a full time, exhausting job. Deflection as in IBM firings is simply the best he can do with what he has to work with.

quote:

Originally posted by jeffeosso:
IBM fired 8,000 due to strategy change... are you going to take and post a statement from each?

Wow. What a load of chatter for 18 words ...

And not a single word of it in support of anything but fired workers

Quod scripsi, scripsi

So, apparently, in the new dem world, 35,000 everyday workers hr, logistics, administration, being fired is way way way less important than a si gle, poor little rich girl being fired. Yall need to go (re?)read your marx on solidarity with the proletariat

What a weird concept, *i* give more of a damn about the outcomes for the masses than some progressives

Lookie there, another in a long string of posts that diesnt support trump, but the l liberal elites will froth at the mouth about it