quote:Originally posted by ledvm:
Undoing 75 years of progressive led government growth/bloat/obesity can be messy when you only have 120 days to do it.
I say keep pouring the gasoline to the chainsaw! Wait!!! I bet Elon has a battery powered one!![]()
quote:Originally posted by ledvm:quote:Originally posted by nute:quote:Originally posted by ledvm:
Nothing but a handful of conservatives left here in the ARPF.
The DOGE thread has pointed that out.
After watching that Brett Baier interview with Musk, Gebbia, and team about DOGE…anyone who is not supportive of that work is not in any way shape or form a conservative and simply obtuse.
Getting rid of non productive backsides on government seats can only be good, but Trump/ Musk appear to have gone about it in a cavalier and amateurish way.
Having to rehire people in agencies which you do actually need, and which you didn’t check were actually needed? Now you have many thousand stuck in limbo because it might have been illegal to fire them. How much is all the legal shenanigans costing the tax payer. Why did no one check this. It appears DOGE are so desperate for “hell yeah” headlines that don’t check what they are doing.
Mike should know better but I will give you the benefit of the doubt Nute.
It’s all about the time frame. Elon has about 75 years of BS to undo in his 120 day appointment. After that the administration has 2yrs to be strongly effective. Then finally 4 years and it’s up to the people again. The chainsaw is only tool for the job.
Let us not forget that we are not talking about a slightly off kilter company here. The US government is so far in debt without of control spending that it really has NO hope to recover…NONE. If it were a private enterprise bankruptcy (actually years ago) would be its only option. This approach is the only chance.
I applaud them!
quote:Originally posted by nute:quote:Originally posted by ledvm:quote:Originally posted by nute:quote:Originally posted by ledvm:
Nothing but a handful of conservatives left here in the ARPF.
The DOGE thread has pointed that out.
After watching that Brett Baier interview with Musk, Gebbia, and team about DOGE…anyone who is not supportive of that work is not in any way shape or form a conservative and simply obtuse.
Getting rid of non productive backsides on government seats can only be good, but Trump/ Musk appear to have gone about it in a cavalier and amateurish way.
Having to rehire people in agencies which you do actually need, and which you didn’t check were actually needed? Now you have many thousand stuck in limbo because it might have been illegal to fire them. How much is all the legal shenanigans costing the tax payer. Why did no one check this. It appears DOGE are so desperate for “hell yeah” headlines that don’t check what they are doing.
Mike should know better but I will give you the benefit of the doubt Nute.
It’s all about the time frame. Elon has about 75 years of BS to undo in his 120 day appointment. After that the administration has 2yrs to be strongly effective. Then finally 4 years and it’s up to the people again. The chainsaw is only tool for the job.
Let us not forget that we are not talking about a slightly off kilter company here. The US government is so far in debt without of control spending that it really has NO hope to recover…NONE. If it were a private enterprise bankruptcy (actually years ago) would be its only option. This approach is the only chance.
I applaud them!
Many of the errors could have been checked in a very short time with the resources available to Trump/Musk. This looks like playing to an audience.
The US govt isn’t a lemonade stand, these are people’s livelihoods and making decisions on the fly is hardly professional. I don’t run my business by providing incorrect information when accuracy is possible with a little work.
quote:Originally posted by LHeym500:
And the fake conservatives are taking snout a third term.
quote:Originally posted by shankspony:
What makes them fake? Or are you talking about Extreme conservative?
Does that mean the ultra woke are fake socialists?