https://apple.news/A2Ox4B0tlS7q6574lLDJmoQ

Interesting is from the article, Trump’s lawyer conceded the S. Ct.’s, immunity case does not extend immunity to a person who is not vested in the office. Vested being sworn.

"Do you have any support for the notion that presidential immunity extends to a president elect?" Gesmer asked.

Blanche replied, "There has never been a case like this before, so no."

This all might just backfire on democrats
Careful what you wish for

Why don’t you tell us how?

Unless the S. Ct., is going to extend federal scrutiny to jury selection which they walked back about 3 years ago.

Maybe, the state appellate courts or the Feds will grant reversible palpable error on the many non-objections made by Trump’s counsel.

Or are you insinuating more far right, violence in the name of Trump? I get it. The certification went down peacefully that sunset needs a good couch burning.