The Accurate Reloading Forums
subjects have no freedom of speech
13 July 2025, 19:21
jeffeossosubjects have no freedom of speech
uk "citizen" and their freedom of speech
https://youtu.be/9w4AMxuQ9Wo?s...53Rs52z_UH6ZI&t=1018here's my little video, sirrah
Your MAGA DICKHEAD has just announced he will renounce the citizenship of a woman who doesn’t agree with him!
No matter how much you try, the FACTS speak for themselves!
Your current despotic ruler is following the previous paths of Hitler and Stalin!
MAGA HITLER AND STALIN!

13 July 2025, 19:34
LHeym500Not even Speech in the Inited States is an unlimited right.
All the law on this has been given. You are simply wrong. They are citizens with a right of expression.
13 July 2025, 19:43
TumbleweedI was listening to the news of the (Canadian) radio this morning, apparently people trying to enter the U.S. (including Americans returning) are being turned away if anything negative or derogatory of Trump is found on their phones or electronic devices.
That includes text messages, cartoons or memes mocking Trump.
They also mentioned that Trump has declared that he’s going to revoke Rosie O’Donnells citizenship because she ‘says nasty things about me!”.
Has the U.S. media been mentioning this?
13 July 2025, 19:45
medvedseems some are not getting what is coming to them ... cant wait to comment on the lovely supporter of the cult of the supreme leader later on when the freedom of speech will be gone ... jeffe will be just a subject of trump ruling lol
13 July 2025, 19:47
medvedquote:
Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I was listening to the news of the (Canadian) radio this morning, apparently people trying to enter the U.S. (including Americans returning) are being turned away if anything derogatory of Trump is found on their phones or electronic devices.
That includes text messages, cartoons or memes mocking Trump.
Has the U.S. media been mentioning this?
talk bad about the king and get in trouble what a surprise lol ...
13 July 2025, 19:51
jeffeossoquote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
Not even Speech in the Inited States is an unlimited right.
All the law on this has been given. You are simply wrong. They are citizens with a right of expression.
What's the "Inited States"?
assuming you meant, but are incapable of spelling, United States, .. well, it takes a fool to try an compare asking someone to speak clearer with screaming "fire" in a theater -
The former, LIVE, can be charged with a hate crime.
oh oh oh --
TRUMP says there's no freedom of speech --
i WISH there was a webcam to record response
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
Not even Speech in the Inited States is an unlimited right.
All the law on this has been given. You are simply wrong. They are citizens with a right of expression.
What's the "Inited States"?
assuming you meant, but are incapable of spelling, United States, .. well, it takes a fool to try an compare asking someone to speak clearer with screaming "fire" in a theater -
The former, LIVE, can be charged with a hate crime.
oh oh oh --
TRUMP says there's no freedom of speech --
i WISH there was a webcam to record response
It is another name for TRUMPSTAN!

13 July 2025, 23:09
medvedquote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by jeffeosso:
quote:
Originally posted by LHeym500:
Not even Speech in the Inited States is an unlimited right.
All the law on this has been given. You are simply wrong. They are citizens with a right of expression.
What's the "Inited States"?
assuming you meant, but are incapable of spelling, United States, .. well, it takes a fool to try an compare asking someone to speak clearer with screaming "fire" in a theater -
The former, LIVE, can be charged with a hate crime.
oh oh oh --
TRUMP says there's no freedom of speech --
i WISH there was a webcam to record response
It is another name for TRUMPSTAN!
ah ah you made my day Dear Host ... and spilled some tea because of that ... so imaginative and real ... the students from afghanistan taught a thing or two to trump lol ...
13 July 2025, 23:22
medvedquote:
Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I was listening to the news of the (Canadian) radio this morning, apparently people trying to enter the U.S. (including Americans returning) are being turned away if anything negative or derogatory of Trump is found on their phones or electronic devices.
That includes text messages, cartoons or memes mocking Trump.
They also mentioned that Trump has declared that he’s going to revoke Rosie O’Donnells citizenship because she ‘says nasty things about me!”.
Has the U.S. media been mentioning this?
if you are trying to enter usa and you are not a citizen and not a supporter of the cult of the supreme leader and dumb enough to try to get in there is nothing that can save you ...

Id like to see a court who upholds that as a hate crime. It's a police officer who is speaking out of his arse. That's why we have checks and balances...and it's why, despite Trumps best efforts, the US does too.
There are enough clips on YouTube of US police overstepping their authority, and there have been enough comments on here of americans not trusting their legal system ... I'm quite happy living under a monarch as a head of state, even if it does give people the opportunity for a trite subject/monarch dig.
Id prefer my head of state you yours any day of the week, irrelevant tho he (my head of state) may be to what goes on here or any aspect of my life.
quote:
Originally posted by Tumbleweed:
I was listening to the news of the (Canadian) radio this morning, apparently people trying to enter the U.S. (including Americans returning) are being turned away if anything negative or derogatory of Trump is found on their phones or electronic devices.
That includes text messages, cartoons or memes mocking Trump.
They also mentioned that Trump has declared that he’s going to revoke Rosie O’Donnells citizenship because she ‘says nasty things about me!”.
Has the U.S. media been mentioning this?
I must admit I didn't believe that until I did a search for it - apparently its true, the orange child did say he was considering revoking her citizenship
https://news.sky.com/story/don...citizenship-13395988We could have a thread here on "what dumb crap Trump has said today", it would be the longest thread in ARPF history.
14 July 2025, 03:09
LHeym500President Trump has already revoked citizenship and voided the 14th Amendment by Executive Order.
Congress should remove him.
14 July 2025, 03:19
wymple"What's the "Inited States"?"
Always trying to stir a pot, right? You are too stupid to know what a typo is? The U & the I are side by side on the keyboard. Too complicated for you? I would not be one bit surprised.
14 July 2025, 06:10
LHeym500Yes, they are that is why I hit the I instead of U.
Freedom is Speech is not unlimited in the U.S. I’m sorry if that upsets you.
Typo is a mistake in written or published writing. I think you have exposed your own lack of understanding.
Again, 1) the 1st Amendment Right to Speech is fare from unlimited. 2) President Trump has already attempted to remove citizenship from an entire class of citizens through an Executive Order voiding current constitutional application of the 14th Amendment. Both of these two legal facts rebut the idea of the original post that UK citizens are somehow not citizens of their government when compared to United States understanding of the government’s power to regulate speech and the attempt to redone citizenship by an elected single person.
The little screen is too small to hit a key accurately wo a lot of attention. I use an iPhone.
Now, both my points in response to the original post are legally factual. Good luck finding disproving them. It cannot be done.
Finally, when this was first broached on AR, I was asked to provide laws that make harassing communications or annoying communication illegal. I provided laws so doing in KY and Texas.
The Right being complained upon is not absolute in the United States. The regulation of speech is does not make a state tyrannical so as to enslave persons under the jurisdiction of that government “subjects” and not citizens. If that were dispositive, we under the jurisdiction of the Federal Government and various state governments we find ourselves in would be subjects. We are not. Those so situated in the UK are not subjects.
The general laws recognizing a right to expression and citizenship having been provided in the original thread. You can figure out how to work the archaic Find function to find the first thread that law was provided previously.
14 July 2025, 15:30
fulvioquote:
Originally posted by wymple:
"What's the "Inited States"?"
Always trying to stir a pot, right? You are too stupid to know what a typo is? The U & the I are side by side on the keyboard. Too complicated for you? I would not be one bit surprised.
Proof-read what has been typed before being over-zealous to hit the enter button.
That is the simplest way to avoid typos and criticism.
