THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MISCELLANEOUS FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
New House bill Login/Join 
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted
Not sure if everyone has seen this one yet. A friend forwarded me a copy of what I think was H.B. 117? I read it + deleted it. I should have saved it but didn't. It is also known as the Sheik law. Basically, it will gut the 2nd amendment + REQUIRE total registration w/ huge jail times for noncompliers. If anyone can pull it up, this NEEDS to be shared! Thanks


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14453 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Try this. HTTPS://www.congress.gov/bill/.../house-bill/127/text. It is listed as H.R. 127 117th congress by Sabika Sheikh.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14453 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Click on that link. I just did + it worked.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14453 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
If politicians spend 1% of their time doing something useful, instead of stupid, they might get something done which helps people!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 55403 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NormanConquest:
Click on that link. I just did + it worked.


The wife found that posted on FB last night (how long will that last) We all need to get after our Rep/ Reps. & senators! tu2

Link works fine. tu2
 
Posts: 2199 | Location: KENAI, ALASKA | Registered: 10 November 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Yes, we do. I hope this notice gets wide coverage. Oh, + yes Saeed, I totally agree but that seems to not run concurrently with politicians interest


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14453 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Firstly: Congress can't gut the 2nd Amendment; it requires a Constitutional Amendment; the states are not going to pass such an amendment. Secondly, even if Congress were to pass such legislation, how many of you patriots are going to abide by a law that takes away your constitutional rights? I hope the answer is none. That's the reason for the 2nd Amendment!
 
Posts: 159 | Registered: 05 August 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I posted something about House Bill H.R. 127 in the Political Forum thinking that was the proper section for this discussion. It didn't take long for the conversation to veer waaaaay off course. After reading the many spirited responses (unrelated to this bill ha ha) perhaps I was mistaken posting it there. But I am fairly current on what a lot of the political forum brethren think of one another.
 
Posts: 391 | Location: Florida | Registered: 07 June 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Firstly: Congress can't gut the 2nd Amendment; it requires a Constitutional Amendment; the states are not going to pass such an amendment. Secondly, even if Congress were to pass such legislation, how many of you patriots are going to abide by a law that takes away your constitutional rights?


“Some one has justly remarked, that ‘eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.’ Let the sentinels on the watch-tower sleep not, and slumber not.”
 
Posts: 391 | Location: Florida | Registered: 07 June 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
At the present time, I know of NO LEO's that are willing to enforce something like this.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14453 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jim@IMReps:
I posted something about House Bill H.R. 127 in the Political Forum thinking that was the proper section for this discussion. It didn't take long for the conversation to veer waaaaay off course. After reading the many spirited responses (unrelated to this bill ha ha) perhaps I was mistaken posting it there. But I am fairly current on what a lot of the political forum brethren think of one another.


Methinks it was the right place for it, but...
It is a mean-spirited bill, jumped the shark, so to speak.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 12488 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
well that now that they have the house, senate, + oval office, they plan to go for everything. I REALLY don't want a civil war but that is what they're advocating. And if we get that far to that advanced stage of social unrest, don't think that other foreign powers won't be right on the fringe like jackels trying to take down a lion. Are the socialists too stupid to see this or is it their game plan?


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14453 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
There are moderate Democrats who are not gun-grabbers. In places where Republicans are going to lose anyway, we should be putting up primary election campaign contributions for them, and making it known why. We could start now, before HR 127 gets momentum, as a hint about 2022 midterms.

The bill is a legislative "kill shot", a laundry list of damn near everything a gun-grabber would salivate over...


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 12488 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2021 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia