Montana Proposes To Triple Wolf Harvest Near Yellowstone
http://mtpr.org/post/montana-p...yellowstone#stream/0Montana Proposes To Triple Wolf Harvest Near Yellowstone
By MATTHEW BROWN - ASSOCIATED PRESS • 15 HOURS AGO
BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Montana officials want to triple the number of gray wolves hunters and trappers can kill in an area bordering Yellowstone National Park, citing complaints the predators are eating too many elk wanted by hunters and outfitters.
The potential change marks the latest turn in a dispute that kicked off when endangered species protections for wolves were lifted in Montana in 2011.
Park officials and wildlife advocates argue wolves that spend much of their lives inside Yellowstone should be given special protections. But state officials, outfitters and hunters point to elk numbers that have fallen dramatically since the 1990s, when wolves were reintroduced in the park.
The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks proposal would increase the annual harvest from two wolves to six in a hunting district near Gardiner. That would stabilize the population — most recently tallied at 24 animals — and keep it from growing, according to the agency.
Yellowstone scientists and administrators have sought for years to establish a buffer zone around Yellowstone where hunting would be restricted. Even under smaller quotas, they've said too many wolves were being killed once they stepped into Montana.
The quota in a second area bordering the park would not change, nor would a similar quota in an area bordering Glacier National Park in the northwestern Montana. Fish Wildlife and Parks Commissioners are scheduled to consider the proposal Thursday, with a final decision in July.
The higher quota is not meant to reduce wolf numbers, but to strike a better balance with competing interests, said Fish, Wildlife and Parks spokesman Ron Aasheim.
Aasheim added that the issue was "a lot bigger than just outfitters," with individual hunters also worried about fewer elk. Likewise, livestock producers are concerned about wolf attacks on cattle and sheep, he said.
"Our guys are saying we could take a few more (wolves) and get down to a better balance with elk and other species," he said.
Marc Cooke with the advocacy group Wolves of the Rockies said he's urging officials to drop their plans to up the quota in the 60-square mile hunting district around Gardiner.
"It's kind of ridiculous that they would consider bumping it up to six, considering it's such a small amount of land," Cooke said. "These Yellowstone wolves and these people who go to Yellowstone to watch wildlife they need to be heard, too."
There's no limit on how many wolves can be killed statewide. Hunters and trappers harvested 210 of the animals in Montana during the 2015 season.
A study published last month by researchers from the University of Washington, Yellowstone and Denali National Park found that park visitors were much less likely to see wolves when hunting was allowed outside park boundaries.
Several wolves well-known among Yellowstone wildlife watchers were killed in Montana during the 2012-13 hunting season. They were among 12 wolves living primarily in Yellowstone that were killed that year after crossing into adjacent areas of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming.
Under pressure from the park and advocacy groups, Montana wildlife commissioners tried to set up a no-kill buffer zone east and west of the town of Gardiner in 2012. A judge struck down those restrictions after ranchers and property rights advocates sued.
A quota of four wolves in the Gardiner area was established in 2013. That was reduced to three animals in 2014 and two last year.
The headline makes it look like they are proposing something extreme, in reality they are upping the harvest quota from two to six. SO WHAT!
11 May 2016, 22:48
p dog shooterA lot more the that needs to be taken
what I always have troubles with is why a park in the US, Africa, or anywhere else needs an extra "buffer zone"
if the state grants a buffer zone, then those against this hunt would want a buffer zone on their buffer zone.
as we get more crunched for land I understand that not everyone is going to be happy, decisions will be made in the hunter's favor as well as against us but it sounds as though this isn't trying to get rid of the wolves just keep their numbers in a manageable status which is the job of Montana fish, wildlife & parks
quote:
Originally posted by Slider:
Are the Permits FREE?
$19 each, you can purchase up to 5 tags.
Sounds like a wonderful opportunity to hunt a preditor who is among the most difficult to hunt! I've been fortunate enough to have trapped and shot many with both rifle and bow so I can attest to the cunning behaviour of a mature male timber wolf. As with any animal they do have certain weaknesses and one needs to exploit these to be successful on a level of consistency.
Great opportunity and good luck to those that choose this great hunting challenge!
19 May 2016, 10:09
boarkillerAwesome idea , how about hunting buffer zone few miles into a park?
19 May 2016, 20:05
chilcotin hillbillyOnly 210 killed last year. That is pathetic, time for the locals to step up there game.
We trapped around 140 just in my region and who knows how many where shot.