The Accurate Reloading Forums
How to do you measure groups?
26 March 2011, 19:06
dogcatHow to do you measure groups?
Do you measure center to center, outside edge to outside edge? What is the standard way to measure a 3 shot or 5 shot group?
Thanks.
26 March 2011, 19:09
p dog shooterI measure mine center to center. Right wrong or otherwise.
26 March 2011, 19:09
rcamugliaMeasure to the outside edge of the Group, subtract one caliber distance to find the "center to center" group measurement
26 March 2011, 21:07
bja105You could also go inside edges of the two farthest apart holes, then add bullet diameter.
I usually go outside to outside, minus caliber. I use the extreme edge of the black smudge, not just the hole.
Jason
26 March 2011, 21:08
crbutlerFor internet use, look at it and say, by golly that's 1/2 MOA!

26 March 2011, 22:00
ted thornI dont get to picky....I just eyball center to center
________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
26 March 2011, 22:04
Blacktailerquote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
For internet use, look at it and say, by golly that's 1/2 MOA!
That's it! Just measure and double the distance. If you shot a 2 inch group, tell everyone you were shooting at 400 yards.

Your friends are guaranteed to be impressed.
Have gun- Will travel
The value of a trophy is computed directly in terms of personal investment in its acquisition. Robert Ruark
26 March 2011, 22:23
JBrownquote:
Originally posted by ted thorn:
I dont get to picky....I just eyball center to center
+1
Can't be more than about .025" off.
Jason
"You're not hard-core, unless you live hard-core."
_______________________
Hunting in Africa is an adventure. The number of variables involved preclude the possibility of a perfect hunt. Some problems will arise. How you decide to handle them will determine how much you enjoy your hunt.
Just tell yourself, "it's all part of the adventure." Remember, if Robert Ruark had gotten upset every time problems with Harry
Selby's flat bed truck delayed the safari, Horn of the Hunter would have read like an indictment of Selby. But Ruark rolled with the punches, poured some gin, and enjoyed the adventure.
-Jason Brown
26 March 2011, 22:28
Cane Ratquote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Measure to the outside edge of the Group, subtract one caliber distance to find the "center to center" group measurement
+1
With really tight groups such as this one it is the only way to measure it.
27 March 2011, 00:47
wasbeemanWhile in cyberspace a "group", like a measurement, can be whatever you want it to be. However, 3 shots are not really a group. It's merely a indication of a POI.
I'm sure we will next be hearing about "groups" that are only two shots. The logic of course being that you seldom shoot at an animal more that twice.
Does that mean I can start quoting one shot "groups"?

Aim for the exit hole
27 March 2011, 01:06
scubaproMake a one shot group and distract the calibers diameter from the outside -outside meassurement...
That´s how the hunting magazine editor´s probably do...

(just a joke)
27 March 2011, 02:57
BarstoolerVery simple.
Go here and get the free download.
http://www.ontargetshooting.com/Barstooler
27 March 2011, 03:20
JBrownquote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
However, 3 shots are not really a group. It's merely a indication of a POI.

Jason
"You're not hard-core, unless you live hard-core."
_______________________
Hunting in Africa is an adventure. The number of variables involved preclude the possibility of a perfect hunt. Some problems will arise. How you decide to handle them will determine how much you enjoy your hunt.
Just tell yourself, "it's all part of the adventure." Remember, if Robert Ruark had gotten upset every time problems with Harry
Selby's flat bed truck delayed the safari, Horn of the Hunter would have read like an indictment of Selby. But Ruark rolled with the punches, poured some gin, and enjoyed the adventure.
-Jason Brown
27 March 2011, 04:27
bartschequote:
How to do you measure groups?
with a ruler?

tee hee roger
Old age is a high price to pay for maturity!!! Some never pay and some pay and never reap the reward. Wisdom comes with age! Sometimes age comes alone..
27 March 2011, 05:25
B. L. O'Connorquote:
Originally posted by dogcat:
Do you measure center to center, outside edge to outside edge? What is the standard way to measure a 3 shot or 5 shot group?
Thanks.
Find greatest dimension of group; measure from outside of one "furthest" hole to the inside of the other "furthest" for center-to-center size. No math needed. (I'm mathematically challenged.)

27 March 2011, 05:37
vapodogUse one of these:
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
27 March 2011, 06:12
GeedubyaUse one or a bunch of these, as necessary
As long as I can cover my group(s)
all is right with the world
GWB
27 March 2011, 06:54
gohip2000a quarter is 0.955 inches and a good field measuring device if needed.
27 March 2011, 07:25
woodsquote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
Measure to the outside edge of the Group, subtract one caliber distance to find the "center to center" group measurement
You got it rc!
____________________________________
There are those who would misteach us that to stick in a rut is consistency - and a virtue, and that to climb out of the rut is inconsistency - and a vice.
- Mark Twain |
Chinese Proverb: When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others.
___________________________________
27 March 2011, 10:06
rcamugliaI get lucky once in a while.
27 March 2011, 18:54
JabaliHunterFire one shot and miss with the others

27 March 2011, 19:45
Kamo Gariquote:
Originally posted by crbutler:
For internet use, look at it and say, by golly that's 1/2 MOA!
lmao
______________________
Hunting: I'd kill to participate.
27 March 2011, 21:19
woodsquote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
I get lucky once in a while.
rc, since that post was right after my post and knowing your propensity for

, it would be possible for me to assume you're referring to my groups as "lucky". You're right! Actually more a function of statistics than anything else. You do enough shooting and statistics will say that eventually you will get a .2" group out of even a 2" shooter. IOW all the shots in the groups "miss" towards the center of the group.
Those targets were from a few years ago and I don't shoot at 100 yards anymore, too BORING and, shall I say, unchallenging. I'm sure even you
might have a couple of targets in the 2's if you weren't so busy pounding steel at long range.
BTW those were just the targets that had written on them the calculation of the group size showing the method under discussion. I could fill a couple of pages of one holers if it were just the group itself under discussion. Again BORING!
____________________________________
There are those who would misteach us that to stick in a rut is consistency - and a virtue, and that to climb out of the rut is inconsistency - and a vice.
- Mark Twain |
Chinese Proverb: When someone shares something of value with you and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others.
___________________________________
28 March 2011, 13:22
303GuyNo good,
woods. They all missed the centre!

I was going to post a pic of one of my better groups but now I won't.

I have a mate or two who measure the accuracy of their guns by firing a 'group' until two shots nearly touch and then that's the accuracy! And no, I don't say a thing - well, other than "Wow, that's good , hey?"

Regards
303Guy
28 March 2011, 15:35
900 SSGWB, dont post pictures before you actually get one in the cap.
28 March 2011, 17:20
Terry BlauwkampSince I am the weakest link in shooting great groups, I shoot 4 shots, and measure the best three.
Remember, forgivness is easier to get than permission.
28 March 2011, 18:45
BISCUTquote:
Originally posted by wasbeeman:
While in cyberspace a "group", like a measurement, can be whatever you want it to be. However, 3 shots are not really a group. It's merely a indication of a POI.
I'm sure we will next be hearing about "groups" that are only two shots. The logic of course being that you seldom shoot at an animal more that twice.
Does that mean I can start quoting one shot "groups"?
I feel the same. It's amazing how groups can grow in size from 2 additional shots.
28 March 2011, 20:27
butchlocseems like lately i find a yardstick useful
28 March 2011, 21:02
rcamugliaquote:
Originally posted by woods:
quote:
Originally posted by rcamuglia:
I get lucky once in a while.
rc, since that post was right after my post and knowing your propensity for

, it would be possible for me to assume you're referring to my groups as "lucky".
You're too sensitive!
I was not talking about those beautiful ragged holes, but the fact that sometimes I actually know the answer to something!

29 March 2011, 15:12
338Userquote:
I think that's called an alternative group. You know, a group that refuses to be together.
I get lots of alternative groups, I either do five or six 3 shot groups and measure outside to outside minus calibre and work out the average of the five or six, or if I don't want to waste too many shots I do one 5 shot group measure the 5 and the best 3 and take the average. You get remarkably similar numbers, even though I don't think there is any logical mathematical or scientific basis behind this.
29 March 2011, 23:36
Scott SpencerI measure center to center as the center of the hole actually represents the real POI of the bullet.
30 March 2011, 08:58
Alberta CanuckIf you measure outside to outside, then subtract one full bullet diameter, you will actually end up with a number which is likely slightly smaller than your actual group.
Why? Because most bullets do not make a hole the same as their full diameter. Bullets of .308" diameter for instance make holes which are often more like .300" in diameter or even smaller. That depends, of course, on the paper itself, the humidity, etc.
A parallel way to envision this is to imagine shooting through a sheet of rubber. The rubber stretches until the bullet finally "pops" through, then the rubber contracts and leaves a much smaller hole than the full bullet diameter.
The same thing usually happens when a bullet is shot through paper, though not nearly to the same degree.
As the stretch and contraction of paper is not as much as happens with rubber, the bullet hole may not be "much" smaller, but it usually IS smaller enough to easily measure with a dial caliper.
A more precise way is to measure the farthest apart holes outside to outside, then measure one bullet hole and subtract the diameter of that one bullet hole from the outside to outside measurement.
My country gal's just a moonshiner's daughter, but I love her still.
31 March 2011, 00:57
wasbeemanBoy, talk about pickin' a nit.

Aim for the exit hole
31 March 2011, 04:37
GaryVAquote:
Originally posted by dogcat:
Do you measure center to center, outside edge to outside edge? What is the standard way to measure a 3 shot or 5 shot group?
Thanks.
Center to center for consistency between calibers, some may be shooting bowling balls while others are shooting BBs.
Some shoot 3-shots and measure extreme spread, regardless which way it spreads. Others shoot 5-shots and measure lateral width by horizontal height to keep track of your groupings to better identify issues. As example, your extreme spread my be 1.5MOA, but the group may be .25MOA tall while strung out 1.5MOA wide.
There is an NRA standard for accuracy testing, and that involves an average of an aggregate of 5-shot groups. There are many ways to measure groups to judge performance, but I tend to shoot 3-shot groups only to center the POI where I wish it to be for sighting purposes. I normally shoot multiple 5-shot groups to judge rifle performance.
Best

31 March 2011, 06:42
LBGuyi just "eye-ball" em'.
31 March 2011, 06:50
ted thornquote:
Originally posted by LBGuy:
i just "eye-ball" em'.
Me too
________________________________________________
Maker of The Frankenstud Sling Keeper
Proudly made in the USA
Acepting all forms of payment
31 March 2011, 07:24
BobsterUnless you are shooting bullets of different diameters at the same target, outside to outside measures of the two furthest apart(3rd group) are the same as center to center.
Only cloverleafs are good. In that case, why measure....

If you see paper between any two bullets- it sucks.
There are two types of people in the world: those that get things done and those who make excuses. There are no others.
31 March 2011, 07:50
GeedubyaI'll call ya' on that,
post your pix.
and raise ya this.....
for every one of those cloverleafs you can show, I bet I can show you two of my group that don't, some even as far out as 300 yds.
Best
GWB
31 March 2011, 11:58
303GuyI use a percentage system. 75% group size and 100% group size. I also look at group shape. But accuracy is the distance of the worst shot from the mean centre. That's how much allowence I need to make for a good hit.
Regards
303Guy