05 April 2005, 04:08
Flippy44 rem.mag with 180gr.
Didn't some famous guy once say that an object in motion tends to stay in motion?
Wouldn't the heavier the object, the MORE it would tend to stay in motion?
I'm with Hitman, heavy and slow beats light and fast, all other things being equal.
But, heavy AND fast beats them all...

06 April 2005, 01:16
Mr Jim BeaglesHeavy doesn't have the shock light does. I haven't had any problems with penetration using Remington 180's. I found that 25gr 2400 works real well in my Ruger SBH. Whitetails just aren't that hard to kill with a proper hit. But then, a proper hit goes without saying!!
06 April 2005, 01:57
Flippyquote:
Originally posted by Mr Jim Beagles:
Heavy doesn't have the shock light does. I haven't had any problems with penetration using Remington 180's. I found that 25gr 2400 works real well in my Ruger SBH. Whitetails just aren't that hard to kill with a proper hit. But then, a proper hit goes without saying!!
A wise old hunter once told me:
quote:
"There's all kinds of wounded, only one kind of dead."
Bigger, heavier bullets give you an advantage when you have a tough shot. Whitetails (and deer in general) are easier to kill than larger animals, true. However, if small and fast made big and slow obsolete, all the African guys would have switched to 30-378's and 300 RUM's.
Might happen eventually, but it hasn't happened yet.
