Anyone use Graf brass? Looking at some 9.3x62 graff brass.

Is their brass good, uniform, etc etc ? or Crap?

Have not had any problems with the Graf brass in 9,3x62 Quality is good but not as good as Lapua , but for the price you can not beat it , just pick up a 100 and try them if it is not what you are looking for just use it for range brass , and save the Lapua for hunting ; )

I've only had minimal dealings with Graffs brass. I ordered 100 7.62x54R, and the only thing that I noticed, was that the flash holes had some decent burrs from the forming process. So I cleaned them up, and voila, great brass. IMHO, it's better than my Norma brass in the same caliber.

mike

Right on , Any of you guys weight a batch of them or volume test several of them ?

Im gearin up for a 9.3x62. $34 bucks for a hundred of thems sould get me started . Deburing aint no biggy.

Gsp, I have used the 7.62X54 ok brass. i have not weight it.

I purchased their 22-250 brass and had a bad expierence with it. i will not get into real details but i did have need to weight this brass and it was all over the scale. also it was not annealed when run through the sizer it would spring back.

based on my experience i will not purchase their brass again.

jme arky65

I bought some in .308 and wasn't real happy with it. The casings are extremely "thick" everywhere you measure. They wouldn't chamber in my gun without full length resizing. The held considerably less powder than rem or win brass. So, even once fireformed they are about 50 fps faster than the other cases. If it was all I could get I'd be happy but with the xtra work in case prep and worrying about working up new loads it wasn't worth the $5.00 saved over reg win, rem, fc brass.

Graf 9,3x62 brass has done very well for me in a CZ Amerfican. The necks are obviously annealed and its performance has been as good as Norma brass in this caliber.

I haven't weighed or volume tested any of my Graffs brass.

(got to be careful with weighing, rim thickness makes a big difference in weight, and no difference in performance).

mike