The guy is a stand up guy and has always backed up his claims, but 1000 rounds with just a boresnake? Just unbelievable.
Or an old POS, like mine?
I've been hanging here rather than the "other" forum. More info that I can put to use on the reloading bench.
I don't doubt the moly story. I've always heard that once you shoot it, you should continue shooting it. But you'll forgive me if I choose to launch my bullets "naked". Went to a reloading seminar at the Atlanta SCI meeting this week and found out that in order to get the extra velocity that moly coating promises, you have to load more powder than the manual maximums. Moly allows this because the bullets reduce pressure. However, no manual gives moly loads because they are afraid someone will use the moly data with non-moly bullets and end up creating a small nuclear device on the firing line. So in order to locate the maximum load for moly bullets, you have to enter uncharted territory on you own.
[This message has been edited by GAHUNTER (edited 03-05-2002).]
Only reason, I would want to clean out the moly is because, force of habit? After shooting for years, its what I always do, go home and get everything out of the barrel. You know the the powder/primer residue when cleaning out the gun. I am not saying its impossible, but for you to get that out with one swipe with a bore snake is pretty incredible. I will give it a try. But I can't say I will not clean it out after 100 rounds. This guy said he never cleans it out for well over 1000 rounds with a fast gun like a 22-250. He shoots every day since hes at the range every day.
Big Stick, how often do you clean it out totally. I was going to give you a ring, but figured wouldn't bother you over a simple subject like this.
Molebdinum Dioxide has a very low coeficient of friction and in regular use the plates of moly slide off of each other. This in fact is how it works as a boundry lubricant.
Competitors to one company that sells colodial moly in engine oil says that at 750F the MOS2 turns into MOS3 which is an abrasive! I don't think that's true but I am not sure.
I am not using moly in any of my guns. I am waiting for others to figure it out.
I did try it 10 years ago and found a small difference in lower velocity and better standard deviation. I never was scientific enough to test fouling or accuracy. I just lost interst in it.
I can tell you this. A grease with moly in it is superior for most applications. This is proven.
A friends 7mm had pitting full length of the bore in less than 1000rnds and he was only using moly bullets that he had coated himself. He was unsure if the moly had caused this prob or not. He found no diff in accuracy, but was easier to clean.
Even after 10+ years of use, there is still a lot of myth floating around about moly. Moly is safe to use in any gun. It won�t break down and form some mysterious acid nor is it hygroscopic. The problem with moly generally revolves around the condition of the bore "before" moly was burnished into the metal. ALL traces of copper fouling must be removed prior to the use of moly bullets. If any fouling is trapped below the moly, pitting can occur in extreme conditions.
Also as pointed out, moly is not a cure for cleaning and rust protection. You should still run some Kroil through the barrel after each shooting session. Even with moly, there is powder fouling in the barrel and this can cause problems. Remove the powder fouling with a few patches of Kroil, Hoppe�s, or Butch�s. Protect the bore with BreakFree and store.
Moly does not work magic in all rifles. Small bores seem to like it better than big bores in my experience. I do use Moly Bore Prep in all my guns even if I intend to shoot copper jackets. The moly embeds in the smallest crevices within the barrel keeping copper fouling out. This makes removing future copper fouling even easier.
Guy Gamello on 10/21/2000 6:37 PM said:
>>There is a posting on Shooters Forum <Highpower>that states that Sinclair has preformed a test with Moly coated bullets and found bore pitting.Is states Sinclair will drop Moly bullets from its next catalog. I hopped Sinclair could respond to let use know if there is any truth to this posting.>>
>>
>>
Dear Mr. Gamello: The Sinclair test is completely correct. You or others may recall that some 3 years past we warned all shooters about the corrosive properties of dry moly (M0S2) and the fact that the inherent acid properties of dry moly could not be neutralized or inhibited. As a result of our efforts to pass on scientific fact, we were subjected to a vicious and sustained attack from a Dan Hackett on a number of shooters bulletin boards. We had pointed out that the only way moly could be inhibited (neutralized) was with a colloidal suspension of MoS2. Such a safe moly formula is now being sold by www.sprinco.com under the name of Plate +. You would be wise to check their web site and review the data presented.
The Parsec Group
Engr/Tech Support
comcentr/hp
Below is the Sinclair reply
Guy Gamello on 10/21/2000 6:37 PM said:
>>
We did some testing over a two year period and found exactly what the Parsec Group had known all along. Molybdenum disulphide is a corrosive material in the powder form that people are using to coat bullets with. It is not inhibited, therefore it contains acidic properties that will pit barrel steel (regardless of wether its chrome or stainless)while in your bore with any moisture present. The Parsec Group neutralized the moly with a colloidal suspension of MoS2. This formula is what the Navy shooting team and others have had great success with. It is being sold by Sprinco? They may be reached at www.sprinco.com for purchasing. This however does not stop the "caking and layering" we experienced while shooting moly. The moly became a hard, glass like material in the bore that was near impossible to remove without vigorous scrubbing with abrasive compounds. Being a bench rest shooter myself, I got shivers up and down my spine scrubbing my Hart and Krieger barrels like this! It just seemed as if our testing lead us to believe that you had to clean just as thoroughly with moly as without if you wanted it to work effectively. Plus we saw no accuracy benefit and ruined three out of ten barrels in the process from pitting. It was like adding another variable to something that already worked. So to answer the original question, we are dropping the coating products but not the bullets that are already coated by the manufaturers. Remember that what we did is in no way a scientific process. But these discoveries were very similar to the Parsec Group -who have studied moly and its effect many years before the shooting industry used it. If you have any additional inquiries feel free to e-mail or call.
Don�t get me wrong - I am not attempting to start an argument. I am simply attempting to understand why we are not seeing all problems that The Parsec Group reported. If 30% of the guns using moly showed pitting, there would be acres of ruined gun barrel junk yards, companies specializing in hazardous moly removal, and every street corner would have a gun smith. What am I missing???
One last thing - I am not completely ignorant or accepting blind faith regarding the use of moly in my rifles. Several of my shooting friends went in together to purchase a Hawkeye Borescope and light kit ($1,100). I scope all my high volume varmint and target guns (some moly) every few months and all my hunting rifles once or twice a year. I check for throat erosion and any other bore problem like pitting. (Before I scope my moly guns, they are cleaned with JB & Sweets.) I have not found any damage yet - who knows, maybe I am lucky.
[This message has been edited by Zero Drift (edited 03-06-2002).]
To the best of my knowledge, none of my barrels have any pits, but I do clean and Moly Grease the barrels anytime they have been afield or to the Range.
Just doesn't take very long at all to clean them with either bronze or nylon bore brushes and Hoppe's BenchRest.
When they are "clean", and you look into the muzzle, the bore does not have the "hall of mirrors" appearance, but has a "slightly" dull-gray look to it.
Here is the best article I've seen written on it. If you do read it, note the number of rounds through the "hot" Norma 6.5mm with "no discernable loss of accuracy".
http://www.precisionshooting.com/aug98.html
------------------
Good hunting and clean 1-shot kills, Hot Core
I generally don't start "scrubbing" until accuracy degrades. That depends upon specific cartridge being used and the quality of the barrel.
All of my shooting/hunting buddies are moly fanatics as well. I've yet to discern adverse effects,nor have friends.
I can't comment on anyone else's barrels or experiences,but I shoot it in every tube I have and am delighted to do so...........
Moly is very common in the Rocky Mountain area and most of the worlds supply is there. If someone contacted say AMAX or the Lubrizol corp and talked to a technical person this might be cleared up.
------------------
Illegitimi non carborundum...
If moly were causing pitting in barrels, imagine what it would do to a copper bullet jacket. I haven't seen any of my bullets turn green yet, after being impact plated with moly. So I don't buy into the moly causes pitting rumor.
I'm not interested in selling moly to anyone. But it seems that those who actually use moly like it, and have never had a barrel "pitted" from it. It's always someone who "had a friend".
Good shooting, MM
Zero do you coat your own or are you using factory coated?
To the others that say they have no pitting have you used a bore scope, because the pitting in my friends 7mm is not visible to the naked eye. I have the rifle in question here and it looks just fine. As stated earlier my friend is unsure if the moly caused the pitting or not.
Would loading a 7mm rem mag hot have caused the pitting? My friend is fanatical about cleaning, could it have been a solvent.
He uses "shooters choice", "sweets 7.62"
and "hoppes benchrest" also acetone between solvents and to remove oil after storing. He does not leave the shooters in for more than an hour, and never leaves sweets in the bore?
BBS - You hit the nail on the head - "Moly from a bearing shop". Bad idea. The grade of moly was most likely the problem.
I purchase most of my moly bullets from Walt Berger. The peening process for coating moly is a pain and time consuming. While there are a lot of easy moly kits, I just rely on Mr. Berger to do the job for me.
You are correct that the only way to inspect a bore is with a bore scope. Pitting can be so small that you cannot see it. Generally you can only feel the pitting with a tight patch, or find it through excessive fouling, or through a loss in velocity.
Sweets is perfectly safe "IF" you follow the directions. If you don�t and you decide to leave it in the barrel for long periods, or you mix solvents, or if you do not properly remove the solvent, pitting can occur. Any high ammonia cleaner is hygroscopic and when left in the bore will pull moisture into the barrel. Moisture and a squeaky clean barrel equals rust and pitting. Always use BreakFree (CLP) after using Sweets.
At the end of the day and this discussion, the poor grade of moly was most likely the cause of the problem. Moral - Shortcuts and creativity are NOT rewarded in the shooting sports.
Well it looks like the bearing moly is the culprit, as I had been told - factory ok, home no good.
Anyone want 1kg of bearing moly?