The Accurate Reloading Forums
BC of Remington 405 gr 45 bullet??

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/969102897

18 January 2008, 03:58
mstarling
BC of Remington 405 gr 45 bullet??
Anyone have an estimate of the ballistic coefficient of the 405 gr Remington SN bullet for the .45/70?

I think it will be close enough to the cast bullet I make to allow me a to get a rough ballistic curve.

Thanks!


Mike

--------------
DRSS, Womper's Club, NRA Life Member/Charter Member NRA Golden Eagles ...
Knifemaker, http://www.mstarling.com
20 January 2008, 00:25
delloro
it usta be on remington's site somewhere. IIRC it was in the 0.180 - 0.210 range. just above "brick" but below "rock." Wink
20 January 2008, 01:30
wrongtarget
Sierra Infinity 5.1 indicates it uses a .281 BC for all velocity boundaries.

Ballistic Coefficients to Velocity Bounds.
0.281 for all velocity boundaries.

.458 dia. 45-70 Govt, 405 gr. SP

20 January 2008, 07:45
South40
Lyman cast bullet #457193 (405 grain flat nosed)has a ballistic coefficient of .307 --S40


Youth and vitality are wasted on the young.
20 January 2008, 12:38
fredj338
quote:
Originally posted by wrongtarget:
Sierra Infinity 5.1 indicates it uses a .281 BC for all velocity boundaries.

Ballistic Coefficients to Velocity Bounds.
0.281 for all velocity boundaries.

.458 dia. 45-70 Govt, 405 gr. SP

The Speer 400gr is pretty close in shape to the RCL. I would bet right around .220?


LIFE IS NOT A SPECTATOR'S SPORT!
20 January 2008, 13:42
asdf
The tables that come with the QuickTARGET software list .280 as the BC.

One of the calculators on this site will estimate a BC for you based on bullet dimensions. Unfortunately, lead bullets usually have bands which the calculator doesn't consider. If you have a chronograph, one of the other calculators there will let you compute the apparent BC, which you can then use in the calculator for trajectory and wind drift.
20 January 2008, 21:48
delloro
well then I stand corrected; the 405 is a bit slicker than a rock after all: Rem 405 BC

it is 0.281