10 August 2004, 08:07
Terry BlauwkampRe: REloader Powders inconsistant?
Quote:
Terry,
I had the same thing happen a couple of years ago. I had a lb of RL-15 that was too slow, a lb of RL-19 that was too slow and a lb of RL-22 that was too fast. I broke down and added a five lb jug of each to add to my powder order. The powder out of the five lb jugs seems to be perfect in matching what the manuals say and do better in my rifles also. All are made in Sweden like my Winchester WXR which is very close to the RL-22. BM
Bill
This weekend,I took all the different cans I had of each powder number,and blended each Powder number together so it is now all the same. At least it will take care of my "lot to lot" variation for a while.
10 August 2004, 08:29
Cal SibleyI've noticed that Reloder-7 is very touchy so to speak, but most powders designed for the smaller cartridges are. Mostly I use Reloder-19 in my 6.5x55 and 6mm Rem. It performs quite well from one container to another, and my accuracy with it has been superb. Best wishes.
Cal - Montreal
10 August 2004, 08:39
<eldeguello>RE 15 is NOT the powder adopted for the 7.62X51mm NATO round. Both 4895 and several different ball powders with about the same burning rate as 4895 are the powders used in the 7.62 NATO. RE 15 may be similar also, but it did not even exist when the 7.62 NATO was being developed.