I have been loading my .44 Mag with 240 gr. laser-cast bullets over either 23.0 gr. H110 or 10.0 gr. Unique. I have used standard large pistol primers for both loads. When shooting the H110 loads, there is a lot of unburned powder residue in the barrel after shooting. Would magnum primers do a better job of igniting the entire charge, or would they raise pressures to unacceptable levels?
Thanks for the help
Joel Slate
Slate & Associates, LLC
The Safari Specialists
www.slatesafaris.com
I have been using Winchester Large Pistol primers for my big bore pistol loading the last few years. They say right on the box that they are for standard or magnum loads.
I have no problem getting complete ingnition of H110, 2400, H 4227, or LIL GUN in my 41 and 44 magnums.
I have found that WW 296 and H 110 just tend to leave lots of powder residue in some loadings. I used to own a S & W Model 57 chambered in .41 Magnum that left all sorts of unburned powder with those two powders, not matter what I tried.
If you want to try a magnum primer with the H 110 loads you should back off a little if you are close to maximum and work up again.
I have seen more than one recommendation as of late that says you should not use magnum primers with 2400 powder, as it WILL cause higher pressures. (Maybe Elmer Keith knew what he was talking about.)
R Flowers
In a way, this is a cop-out, because a great many people love Unique in .44 Magnum such as you're loading or even lighter, and for economy do use standard primers. However, for me my policy is worth the few extra cents a box....
Beyond that, your other load uses a hard-to-ignite powder which really ought to have the advantage of Magnum primers. I'm sure you will see greater consistency from shot to shot as well.....
quote:
Originally posted by R Flowers:
I used to own a S & W Model 57 chambered in .41 Magnum that left all sorts of unburned powder with those two powders, not matter what I tried.R Flowers
I do not know the podwer charge you were using but can tell you from first hand experience that using CCI-350 primers would have cured that problem. I have used both the WLP & CCI-350. I keep the WLP for light cast bullet loads and the CCI's for ALL magnum loads of H110 or W296. No problems with excessive unburnt powder.
mike
------------------
NRA Life Member
America, Love it or LEAVE IT!
Thank you so much for all of the help. The lead bullets with the H110 load does lead the barrel some, and I am not sure if gas checks would help that out or not.
I will try the magnum primers, and I will definitly back off the load a half a grain or so with the H110. The Unique loads are just a lot of fun to shoot.
Joel Slate
Slate & Associates, LLC
The Safari Specialists
www.slatesafaris.com
quote:
Originally posted by mssmagnum:
I do not know the podwer charge you were using but can tell you from first hand experience that using CCI-350 primers would have cured that problem. I have used both the WLP & CCI-350. I keep the WLP for light cast bullet loads and the CCI's for ALL magnum loads of H110 or W296. No problems with excessive unburnt powder.mike
Mike: Not wanting to be argumentative here, BUT, I tried CCI 350 primers in that darned .41 magnum and Nothing, but Nothing would solve the unburned powder problem. I was trying to get a max load out of that gun and could not get good performance with 296 or H110. I wound up using Blue Dot and got clean burning, better groups, and even a little better speeds. 2400 also did well in that gun, but 296 and H110 were a bust. In the Ruger 41 mag I own currently, I have no such problems with unburned powder, go figure! My best load in this Ruger 41 mag is with 2400 powder. Thanks, R Flowers
To the original question, I've always used CCI 350's with H110, but with 2400, unique, univ. clays and red dot, CCI 300's.
quote:
Originally posted by R Flowers:
Mike: Not wanting to be argumentative here, BUT, I tried CCI 350 primers in that darned .41 magnum and Nothing, but Nothing would solve the unburned powder problem. I was trying to get a max load out of that gun and could not get good performance with 296 or H110. I wound up using Blue Dot and got clean burning, better groups, and even a little better speeds. 2400 also did well in that gun, but 296 and H110 were a bust. In the Ruger 41 mag I own currently, I have no such problems with unburned powder, go figure! My best load in this Ruger 41 mag is with 2400 powder. Thanks, R Flowers
WOW, that is really wierd! I had the unburned powder problem with Blue Dot! Even with both primers.....go figure.
mike