29 November 2004, 14:49
Ku-dudeRe: Strange Groupings
Jim,
There are a couple of things to consider. First, from what you say, you were working up this load and got to a particular velocity and this started. If this is so, you may want to add another .5gr of powder if the load was safe, and continue to work up the ladder. One would expect to find harmonics that do what you are describing (two bullets right on the peak and the next a little before or after).
Second, once you arrive at the velocity you desire, if you have not previously experimented with seating depth, you should. I'd start by slicing a case neck on an old case, insert a bullet far enough out to engage the rifling, and chamber it. Remove it carefully and measure the overall length. Do this 10 times and take an average. Then back off this length by 10/1000 as point of beginning.
Third, you don't say if you are letting the barrel cool or not. If so, with a light barrel, it may be barrel heat. Let it cool and try three shots from a cold/cool barrel.
It would be helpful to know which of the three shots is drifting out. If it is the third, I'd opt for heat.
Practically, very few animals are going to let you take three shots at them. If you missed with the first two, you ain't gonna get a third shot. Ku-dude
29 November 2004, 12:01
djpaintlesDenton, Maybe I was just too lazy. I hated manual figuring standard deviation when a spreadsheet would do it for me.
I know that there are some types of statistics that are very useful for shooting, in Long Range Black Powder Shooting we load for low velocity variation because thats what will make your shots string vertically. I just get a little frustrated separating the wheat from the chaff as far as useful statistics go.
I have no idea why it is so Statistically, but in my hunting rifles I feel a lot more secure about a hunting load that shoots 10 3shot groups well on 10 different days than one that shoots 3 10shots groups well on the same day. I want a gun that shoots a load the same in varying conditions not necessarily one that shoots a statistically more valid # of shots etc. Oh and thanks for having a sense of humor I wasn't trying to be too mean to anyone.........DJ
29 November 2004, 14:18
zoomzoomI've always tested my loads with 4 shot groups.......if I had any flyers I would work on it until the flyers were no more...pretty simple I guess.
Didn't need to use any science type data.......they never get over arguing about science anyway.........evalution versus creation is a good example...........I go for the creation theory myself.
Oh, back to the bullet group thing.....the shelf of Trophies from my HUNTING rifle says my theory works pretty good....even up against a few varmit shoots in the past.