43 grains: 2703, 2696, 2719 Ave. 2706
44 grains: 2734, 2673, 2668 Ave. 2691
45 grains: 2736, 2732, 2754 Ave. 2740
46 grains: 2803, 2816, 2846 Ave. 2821
Remington Factory 150 grain Corelokt:
2571, 2542, 2536 Ave. 2549
What gives? I don't get this. Either Remington is severly
underloading or I am severly overloading which I do not believe is
the case. My primers are just showing the rounded cup edges being
sharpened up with the 46 grain load, none have any sign of
splashing and ejection is very positive. The interior of the cases are
carbony with less than 45 grains and clean up with 45-46 grains. I
think 2800 is excellent with this short barrel but am I over. The
Nosler book (from which I pulled these powder weights) uses a 24"
Lilja barrel and I am supposed to LOSE ~26fps with each inch. I
should be getting 100fps less shouldn't I?
I think I will load up some with RL-15 and see what happens.
Any comments welcomed.
Your load looks fine.
Good Luck,
Steve
------------------
Every man dies, but not every man really lives!!
On one end of the spectrum in .30-06 we have Federal Premium 180-gr. Nosler Partition which was 250 fps under listings. Federal High Energy with the same bullet was right around factory listings but gave pressure signs in both my rifles!
The flip side was the .270 Federal Classic 150 RNSP which exceeded advertised velocities despite only a 22" barrel.
Anyone ever try writing to the manufacturers about this?
John
The action of you gun probanbly contributes to the decrease in velocity.
Did you try shooting the same ammo out of a bolt gun?
99% of shooters have no access to chronographs, and have no idea what kind of performance their ammunition is turning in. Underloading ammunition is (1) cheaper and (2) a bit safer for the ammo companies. And since nobody but people like us know the difference, and knowing the difference just makes us reload more and consume more components, underperforming factory loads are a win-win for the factories.
It also creates a market for "high-enegy" and "super-premium" loadings at inflated prices, which in reality, just about reach factory-claimed velocities for the regular loads. Ain't it a wonderful country!
My point? Every rifle is unique, even if they're from the same manufacturer or gunsmith. This applies to accuracy and velocity, as well as other aspects of the rifle. So what you read from any published ballistic source applies to the particular gun and test, but YMMV.
You are correct. I have never done it with 3 or 4 rifles but have tried 2 identical factory Sako 223s and 2 custom 7 x 57s with the same barrel length. Depending on the load, velocities varied between 100 to 200 fps from rifle to rifle.
I have also seen velocities vary as much as 8 % just by changing lots of the same type powder.