07 August 2003, 05:13
BFaucettHornady interbond milk jug test
Also, here's JJHACK's report on the .30 cal 165gr Interbonds right here on good ol' Accurate Reloading.
http://www.nookhill.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=007897-Bob F.
12 September 2003, 01:02
Johnny RingoGrizz,
The name of the thread is
Re: My South African Trip Report.
Go to search
Search for JJ hack
Look for that thread.
12 September 2003, 01:03
Johnny RingoBfaucett hit the nail on the head. Didn't see his link. Go to it, same article.
11 October 2003, 03:50
POPRotational speed..........
Makes liitle or NO difference. This was tested thoroughly in Handloader magazine a couple of years back in an all 30 caliber bullets test. No difference!
[ 10-10-2003, 18:51: Message edited by: POP ]11 October 2003, 03:55
<Savage 99>Pop,
I read that when the Failsafe was developed the testing and development turned out wrong because they used reduced loads instead of full power loads. I got this info second hand and have never seen a report from Olin.
11 October 2003, 07:32
Ma BellGrizz, Thanks for the posting, I was very glade to see the jacket and core remaining together. It would be interesting to see what something hard between jugs 1 and 2 would do. (something like bone).
This is obviously an improvement it bonding the jackets and that I welcome. Good job Grizz, thanks for the info.
I will still use partitions, but,,,,,
That's just the way I do it,,,,,,
![[Roll Eyes]](images/icons/rolleyes.gif)
12 October 2003, 18:38
elkhntrI shoot the 165 IB in my 300 Win mag. I get 1/2 inch groups with 76.5 gr R22 (velocity should be around 3050, but I havent been able to chrono them). I was considering doing the same type of testing you have done to determine how touhg these bullets were. Thanks for posting your results.