The Accurate Reloading Forums
Hornady interbond milk jug test

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/61610166

07 August 2003, 05:13
BFaucett
Hornady interbond milk jug test
Also, here's JJHACK's report on the .30 cal 165gr Interbonds right here on good ol' Accurate Reloading.

http://www.nookhill.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=007897

-Bob F.
12 September 2003, 01:02
Johnny Ringo
Grizz,
The name of the thread is

Re: My South African Trip Report.

Go to search
Search for JJ hack

Look for that thread.
12 September 2003, 01:03
Johnny Ringo
Bfaucett hit the nail on the head. Didn't see his link. Go to it, same article.
11 October 2003, 03:31
POP
Nice work grizz!
11 October 2003, 03:50
POP
Rotational speed..........

Makes liitle or NO difference. This was tested thoroughly in Handloader magazine a couple of years back in an all 30 caliber bullets test. No difference! [Wink]

[ 10-10-2003, 18:51: Message edited by: POP ]
11 October 2003, 03:55
<Savage 99>
Pop,

I read that when the Failsafe was developed the testing and development turned out wrong because they used reduced loads instead of full power loads. I got this info second hand and have never seen a report from Olin.
11 October 2003, 07:32
Ma Bell
Grizz, Thanks for the posting, I was very glade to see the jacket and core remaining together. It would be interesting to see what something hard between jugs 1 and 2 would do. (something like bone).
This is obviously an improvement it bonding the jackets and that I welcome. Good job Grizz, thanks for the info.

I will still use partitions, but,,,,,

That's just the way I do it,,,,,, [Roll Eyes]
12 October 2003, 18:38
elkhntr
I shoot the 165 IB in my 300 Win mag. I get 1/2 inch groups with 76.5 gr R22 (velocity should be around 3050, but I havent been able to chrono them). I was considering doing the same type of testing you have done to determine how touhg these bullets were. Thanks for posting your results.