--http://pages.chatropolis.com/general/geo/primer.jpg--
(Sorry, you need to cut/paste . . . tight assed ISP won't allow hot links.)
I also got ejector marks on the rim of the brass. This is with the bullet sitting on the lands.
I backed off 0.020" from the lands, reduced the load to 29.5 gr. and this reduced pressure/velocity. But I'm still getting some "cratering" of the primer. Very slight cratering, a rough edged dimple around the firing pin. The primer is not backing into the firing pin like the photo above.
What's "acceptable" for the primer?
I see bullets seated from right on the lands to 0.005" to 0.010" . . . to 0.020". I realize this is part of tuning the load, but what's a "nominal" set-back from the lands?
Standard neck chamber. Brass trimmed to 1.750"
Thanks.
------------------
.223 Ackley Improved Wildcat Forum:
http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=223ackleyimproved
------------------
A well placed bullet is worth 1,000 ft/lbs of energy.
quote:
Originally posted by Bob338:
One frequently overlooked cause of cratered primers is the metal used in the primer cup itself. They DO vary, even in the same manufacturer. Primer cratering tells you nothing about the load most of the time.
Federal 205's . . . small rifle. I think about going to something a bit heavier in the cup.
The primer is not flowing into the primer pocket. It's backing into the firing pin hole. I should be able to get 3650 fps velocity from this load. Right now I'm getting about 3510 fps.
Rifle is a Rem. 700 PSS. Should be in good shape.
------------------
.223 Ackley Improved Wildcat Forum:
http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=223ackleyimproved
[This message has been edited by Genghis (edited 05-11-2002).]
quote:
Originally posted by beemanbeme:
While I rarely if ever try to motor my guns at the top end, velocity is one of the last things I consider. Accuracy, dependability, brass life span, and several other things are looked at before I consider velocity. It kinda falls where it falls. Since you have 'fast' barrels and 'slow' barrel within the same make of rifles, I'm not sure its a good idea to arbitrarily take a velocity figure and try to work to it.
Yeah, but a flat trajectory goes hand in hand with velocity. 3456 fps is what the books show for standard Rem. I expect that the Ackley Improved will provide more velocity -- like about 3650 fps at a charge weight of 29.5 gr.
Accuracy is fine at this weight. I just wonder if the cratering is a pressure index or if it's something that I don't need to worry too much about.
------------------
.223 Ackley Improved Wildcat Forum:
http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=223ackleyimproved
[This message has been edited by Genghis (edited 05-12-2002).]
quote:
Originally posted by Sniper06:
Genghis, have a couple guns in .223, and have played with the idea of A.I.. What are my potential gains in powder capacity and velocities with say, a 60-62 grain bullet. Also, since my barrel is chrome-plated, is my chamber as well? On my AR-15, I don't want to mess with reaming it out if it isn't worth it. Any info you can give me will be apreciated. Thanks..Lee
Yeah, the chamber is chrome lined in the AR-15. You don't want to do the rechamber for several reasons:
First -- rechambering requires that you set-back the barrel. This moves the gas port. You don't want to mess with moving the gas port.
Second -- Ackley Improved brass gets neck sized. The case is straight walled with a steep shoulder. In theory, this is not an optimal shape for a semi-auto feed system.
Third -- Neck sized brass may or may not feed into your chamber just because it's "tight" rather than full-length resized.
Ackley Improved is more or less intended for bolt actions. It's a wildcat load that can get sort of "fussy" about spec.
I neck turn my brass, and otherwise spend a lot of time polishing, trimming, deburring, uniforming, weighing, etc. Last thing I want to do with this stuff is have a semi-auto ejector fling it across the range and onto the ground!
Generally, wildcat loadings get out on the edge of pressure spec. As strong as the action is on the AR, it's not designed like a bolt action system.
The 223 Ackley increases case capacity about 10% -- 12%. And then we increase the load by the same margin with the intention of getting gains in velocity of about 10% - 12%.
Standard velocity for 45 gr. bullets is about 3456 fps. I'm looking to get 3650 fps. That's about 17% gain in velocity. But we're seeing pressure signs at the primer/firing pin.
Mostly what I've gained in going to Ackley is a barrel with no "free bore" a new chronograph, lots of chronograph stats, a lot more time spent at the bench, and some real working insight into internal ballistics and ballistics software.
I like it. Some would not.
------------------
.223 Ackley Improved Wildcat Forum:
http://www.hotboards.com/plus/plus.mirage?who=223ackleyimproved
[This message has been edited by Genghis (edited 05-13-2002).]
------------------
BigBob