Are they ever going to get it straight?!?? This is in the 2004 shooting catalog pg.23.



They can't seem to get the discriptions of the SST and Interbond correct. Not only is the B and C mixed up, the description and nomenclature are wrong.

This just makes it hard for newbies to get the bullet they want, and be able to use the proper names. They've been told they had it muffed up in previous catalogs, why can't they change it?

I just checked your claim, and you certainly are correct.

I am curious, which holds together better, the SST, or the Interbond? It would be interesting to do side by side comparisons.

Mike, without a doubt, the interbond holds together much better. I did some testing in water filled milk jugs, I'll get the url of it here on AR so you can look at the results.

http://www.accuratereloading.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=UBB6&Number=700399&Forum=f6&Words=&Searchpage=0&Limit=25&Main=302230&Search=true&where=bodysub&Name=2025&daterange=1&newerval=3&newertype=m&olderval=&oldertype=&bodyprev=#Post700399

I shot some SST's at the same time as the last test, just out of curiousity. They litteraly exploded, just the jacket and a few shards of lead left. No better that the Nozler BT.