21 December 2004, 10:14
DwightNeck Sizing versus full length?????
I have always full length resized and I was told at the range this weekend that neck sizing would improve accuracy since my brass is now fireformed for my rifle (bolt action).
I was also told the increased volume reduced pressures. Is this okay for bench shooting and not a good idea for hunting?
In my Sierra manual it says to backoff the full length die about 1/2 to 3/4 turn for a custom fit.
Comments from the pros are appreciated.
Thanks
Dwight
21 December 2004, 10:23
dentonNo real pro here, but, if you're shooting a bolt action, and if you're not going to try to shoot the ammo in more than one gun, neck sizing has all the advantages.
I don't really think you'll see any significant change in pressure, but, you don't have to lube the cases, and they last a lot longer... the better accuracy claim is often made, but I've seen no data to support that.
I use the Lee collet dies, rather than trying to neck size with a standard die.
21 December 2004, 10:37
butchlocI've heard this talked for 50years, As near as I can figure I've fired around 20,000 per year for about 50 years. I tried neck sizing, collet sizing, full length sizing, and a few others. Near as I can figure all work equally as well. Full length does not seem to detract from accuracy, but will allow you to use the same load in more than 1 gun. By the way my best group was a bit ago. .012 at 300 yds from a 22/250 full length sized.
21 December 2004, 10:47
DwightThanks for the comments. I am always looking for information that may be an improvement to my knowledge base.
Looks as though I should not fix what is not broken since I get 1/2 to 3/4 groups in hunting rifles.
Dwight