The Accurate Reloading Forums
Which Bullet Would You Choose Between These

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/299105563

11 November 2005, 03:45
Bearbuck
Which Bullet Would You Choose Between These
If you had to choose between these 3 bullets which would it be? It will be a hunting bullet, but with the most accuracy you can get and reputable. The choices are: 1. Speer Spitzer SP (flat base), 2. Sierra Spitzer (flat base) 3. Hornady SP. (flat base). There you go, let me know which you would choose and what kind of experience you have had with these.


" The Greatest Reflection of the Kind of Person You Are, can be Given and Answered best by the People who Work for You rather than those You Work For. "
11 November 2005, 04:33
Ol` Joe
Hunting what,`yotes`, deer, elk, bear??

I like Hornadies for deer, but I`ve have good luck with the others on them also.


------------------------------------
The trouble with the Internet is that it's replacing masturbation as a leisure activity. ~Patrick Murray


"Why shouldn`t truth be stranger then fiction?
Fiction after all has to make sense." (Samual Clemens)

"Saepe errans, numquam dubitans --Frequently in error, never in doubt".



11 November 2005, 04:40
Dwight
Sierras have been more accurate for me at .230 but they separate too bad in the deer. I switched to Barnes TSX and and shoot .375 but they kill better don't leave pieces of bullet in the meat.
Good Luck
11 November 2005, 06:51
Pathfinder
Making the assumtion that you're after deer and at least a.277 caliber I would choose the hornady first, sierra second and speer last.I have shot far more deer with hornady than sierra and only one with a speer. They all worked on deer.
11 November 2005, 07:09
vapodog
I'm a die hard Hornady fan for lighter big game...deer size animals.

My loading bench is surprisingly lacking in green boxes....but a few Speer bullets are there and I'd say that between speer and Hornady about 95% of the bullets are theirs.

Others usually are A-Frames, Northforks, Woodleighs.....

What's a Sierra???


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."
Winston Churchill
11 November 2005, 07:22
RaySendero
quote:
Originally posted by Pathfinder:
Making the assumtion that you're after deer and at least a.277 caliber I would choose the hornady first, sierra second and speer last.I have shot far more deer with hornady than sierra and only one with a speer. They all worked on deer.


Some may have a preference but kinda like Pathfinder says "They all worked on deer". I If your hunting deer and using a 270 or bigger, I doubt you'll be able to tell the difference. About the only thing I can add is that in my 270 I prefer to use the 150 Sierra over the 130s.


________
Ray
11 November 2005, 07:36
First Shot
I've loaded and tested the 140 Grn Sierra's, 140 Grn Hdy's, and 145 Grn Speer's and they all shoot sub MOA in my 7mm-08 out to 200 Yds; however, the 145 Grn Speer (HotCor) spire points are going to the woods with me this Saturday!

I kind of like the little additional weight of the Speers and I think (hope) the HotCor's will hold together a little better than the Sierra's or Hdy's. Also, the trajectory of the 145 grn Speers matched the closest to my Burris Ballistic Plex reticle aim point trajectories.

firstshot
----------------------------
Make your first shot count!
11 November 2005, 07:48
N E 450 No2
I have killed deer with all 3 brands of those bullets. As far as terminal performance I have not seen a great deal of difference between them. They all work great.


DOUBLE RIFLE SHOOTERS SOCIETY
11 November 2005, 21:27
Paul H
Whatever shoots best in your rifle, I dought you'll see a signifigant difference in performance between them. If you're using enough bullet for the task at hand that is, and not driving them too fast. Me thinks conventional cup/core bullets are at their best when muzzle velocities do not exceed 2700 fps


__________________________________________________
The AR series of rounds, ridding the world of 7mm rem mags, one gun at a time.
11 November 2005, 22:40
ricciardelli
Totally depends on caliber, weight and velocity.


http://stevespages.com
11 November 2005, 22:59
Doc
quote:
Originally posted by ricciardelli:
Totally depends on caliber, weight and velocity.


...and the animal hunted.

I have never shot the Hornady flat based spitzers so I cannot say. They sure are popular though here. I've had better accuracy with the speer. Sierra would be my last choice.


Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my guns
12 November 2005, 02:38
HunterJim
Bearbuck,

Hornady is my de facto choice for hunting, but I would like to ask what caliber you are shooting and what you are shooting.

jim


if you're too busy to hunt,you're too busy.
12 November 2005, 05:09
Bearbuck
Shooting a 308win. in 22 inch barrel and 1 in 10" twist. Bolt action. Thanks


" The Greatest Reflection of the Kind of Person You Are, can be Given and Answered best by the People who Work for You rather than those You Work For. "
12 November 2005, 09:39
schromf
quote:
What's a Sierra???


Vapodog,

You got to have green boxes if your into target shooting, those and a liberal does of Nosler Match bullets, but the Nosler's are Johnny come lately so to speak. I admit they aren't my favorite medium and big game bullets but I wouldn't pass on a deer if I only had gamekings loaded. ( Isn't going to happen, I haven't actually bought a box of gamekings in years). Three of my alltime favorite match bullets 168 gr and 190 Matchkings in 30 cal, and the 300 gr 338 matchking this are awesome bullets, crap to hunt with but boy they ring the dong on a target range. The other Sierra bullet that is awesome is my old stash of 87 gr boatails in 25 cal ( discontinued ).

Bearbuck,

I shoot Hornady's they are good range bullets and keep my ammo costs down, I prefer better bullets for hunting though. I am particulaly lukewarm on 30 cal Hornady bullets. Of your choices I would pick the Sierra Gameking flat base. Second would be the Speer, and last would be the Hornady. Before I would use any of the I would first try Nosler Partion 165 gr, and if the cost of these is too high use the try the ballistic tip Noslers these are equal accuracy to the Sierra's.
12 November 2005, 18:35
old4x4
The Hornady spitzer hands down! Every deer me, my father, and brother have taken in the last 7-8 years are with a Hornady (including mine this week!!). Never any problem with accuracy or performance at all.


"It's like killing roaches - you have to kill 'em all, otherwise what's the use?"
Charles Bronson
12 November 2005, 19:05
kraky
The .308 operates at a velocity that doesn't screw up bullet performance.....your good old standard bullets will work fine...choose the most accurate....but I am a hornady fan when it comes to standard bullets.....they usually shoot great for me.
13 November 2005, 01:09
Safarischorsch
quote:
Originally posted by ricciardelli:
Totally depends on caliber, weight and velocity.


Absolutely correct!

A good bullet for the 3006 is the Brenneke TOG because it works very good on deer and is very accurate.

But it is extremly expensive! Mad
13 November 2005, 09:39
Maltese Falcon
I have used Hornady, Sierra, Speer, Lapua, RWS, Remington, Winchester, MHG Bullet and a few others and in relative terms, as long as a suitable bullet/cartridge/gun combination in relation to the animal being hunted is used the animal in question will never know the difference.

I would see what shoots best in your particular rifle and as long as it's suitable for the purpose you intend to use it for, run with it.

Take three deer and shoot them with a 150 grain .30 caliber bullet loaded to the same velocity, fired from the same gun, with the only difference being the make of bullet and I doubt that anyone could tell you which bullet was which based upon the wound profile.