The Accurate Reloading Forums
6.5mm

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/2511043/m/12510845

24 November 2001, 10:35
<dean>
6.5mm
I'm looking at building a flat shooter for deer. Want to have dies available, so am sorting through the 6.5-06, 264 Win Mag, 6.5-300 Weatherby, or the 7-300 Weatherby.

Of the 6.5's listed, is there a considerable velocity gain of the larger 2 calibers?

Any ideas or load data would be appreciated.

24 November 2001, 18:06
denton
The 6.5 is an excellent caliber, so I think you are on the right track.

Some of the cartridges you have listed have a reputation as "barrel burners". You probably want to listen to some experienced owners, so you don't end up spending money on a new barrel sooner than you had planned.

I shoot a 29" Swede, 6.5x55, which pushes 140 grains at 2800 fps. The barrels last a long time, and the deer can't tell the difference between 2800 and 3100 fps.

24 November 2001, 18:22
<Mike Dettorre>
Since ou are realistically talking about a 140 grn bullet and 6.5/06 will be plenty flat very for as far out as you can hold the other cases will just burn more powder.
25 November 2001, 10:30
<OKShooter>
Dean -- Both the 6.5 and 7mm-300 Weatherby cases are seriously overbore with currently available propellants -- even H870. Hell, with anything less than a 200 gr. bullet, the 300 Weatherby is overbore for a 30 caliber with anything faster than H-1000.

I suggest you stick with nothing larger than the '06-sized case -- either standard or AI with the 40� shoulder. With a 24" barrel, you should be able to push a 140 grainer along at right around 2900+ fps (Viht N-165), and this going to produce a plenty flat trajectory.

The 120, 125, and 129 gr. bullets are somewhat more suitable for deer-sized critters, and these can be pushed along at 3,000 to 3,100 fps depending upon bullet and weight.

Even with the 6.5x55mm Swede, if I am willing to take the pressures up to around the 60,000 psi level of the '06, I can get 2800 fps with 140 grainers out of the 26" barrel of my rifle. (I can take the pressures up in my rifle because it is a Remington M700 action with a 26" Douglas Premium barrel.)

I suggest, though, you opt for 1-8 twist instead of the more conventional 1-9. The 1-8 twist will stabilize the long 140 grainers and the RN 160 grainers, while not too much overly stabilizing the lighter bullets.

25 November 2001, 12:00
<AKI>
Vihtavuori 20N29 has the burning rate of dry birchwood. 6,5-300Wby and the likes are not overbore anymore. But the barrels might be a tad short... AKI
25 November 2001, 14:52
<Robin>
P.O. Ackley considered the 06 case the max for the 6.5 before overbore. He even considered the 6.5-06 AI beyond the best efficiency. While your at it it is really tough to beat the old 6.5x55 Swede. Its not quite as hot as the 6.5-06 but it is accurate, lethal, light on recoil and forgiving.

------------------
Robin
from Tucson, AZ

25 November 2001, 23:58
<AKI>
The rifle powders available to Ackley are almost pistol powders compared to the BMG powders available today. If P.O. would have had some 24N41 or 20N29 he would have called a 6,5mm/416Rigby overbore. There�s the difference! AKI
26 November 2001, 08:31
<Slamfire>
I know that in the .264 Winny, some folks are equaling the originally published ballistics in 24" barrels using one of the .50 BMG powders. I don't know which one. Still the slower the powder the sooner the barrel erodes, I'd be more than satisfied with the 6.5-.284, but then I'm happy with my .260.
26 November 2001, 10:09
<sure-shot>
I've heard and read good things about 6.5-284, 260Rem and 6.5-308(same as 260?). Built on a short action in a McMillan stock you would have a excellent deer thumper with minimal recoil. sure-shot
26 November 2001, 10:17
DMCI*
Some of the target/match shooters in my area have cycled through calibers as follows 6.5-.284, 6.5-.308(.260) and are now shooting 6.5-.308 Ackely Improved, which they claim give excellent velocity with short action configuration.
28 November 2001, 11:19
<LReynolds>
I have been shooting a 6.5-06 for about 10 years and love it. I previously worked with two 264 Mags with 24" bbls and found that my 6.5-06 with 25" bbl almost equals the 264 Mag and is not nearly as finicky as the 264's.....LR



28 November 2001, 13:16
Paul H
I'd think with modern powders the 264 win mag might be worth re-avulating. I would want at least a 27" barrel to get its potential though, and you just might want to consider a Ruger #1 with a 29-30" barrel, carries the same as a bolt gun with a 25-26" tube.

I'm a 6.5 nut, and still have the urge for a hot 6.5, just haven't figured the ideal one yet. I would think a long tubed .264 would be capable of pushing 120's in the 3300-3500 realm.