Aoccdrnig to rseearch sutides at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't
mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng
is taht the frist and lsat ltteer are at the rghit pclae. The rset can
be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is
bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by istlef but the wrod as a wlohe.

[ 10-05-2003, 23:49: Message edited by: grumble ]

Yep....I had that many martinis too.....

Grumble--you crack me up.

Our deputies obviously subscribe to this same line of reasoning. I was reviewing some reports this morning--the spelling and grammatical errors would cause my English-teaching wife to faint.

I saw that... And I also subscribe to the philosophy, that what bothered me most was....
I HAD NO PROBLEM READING IT!>>>>>>>>>>>>>Bug.

An accurate observation - written as ANY engineer would wrtie it.

Yep! ... felix

Bought # 1 son a "Franklin" device that checked spelling. As a college freshman he mispelled the same word 5 different ways on the same page of a report he was doing. We figured that wasn't gonna win him any "points" with the profs. He fixed his problem for good by finding a gal who proofed his work for him. When the word processing programs came up with spell check the hand held units became history. BTW - I had no problem reading grumbles post either. Prob'ly cause I'm an engineer as well. Pilgrim