05 August 2014, 17:18
Deketarget dot versus fine duplex reticle
I am asking this question in regards to a VX 2 for high-power silhouette. I'm interested to know the advantages of one versus the other.
Thanks,
D
05 August 2014, 22:51
butchlocthe dot draws you eye focus to it, much like a red dot would. i really prefer the dot
06 August 2014, 00:53
Safari JamesI love the dot reticle. Allows me to focus my attention on one spot without the distraction of other clutter.
07 August 2014, 05:27
sambarman338The Lee dot seems to have a great reputation, perhaps dating from when posts and plain crosshairs were about the only alternatives.
How are they for shooting varmints at long distances?
07 August 2014, 08:24
youngoutdoorsI love the dot and would get it on every scope if possible. I like the 1/8" dot myself.
God Bless, Louis
31 August 2014, 08:47
SR4759I have a fine crosshair in an older Leupold 24X benchrest scope when the 24X was the highest magnification they made. I think it is a 1/8 minute wide crosshair. (Not a duplex)
I also have a older but later model 36X Leupold benchrest scope with a 1/4 minute dot.
The fine crosshair kills my eyes. I like the 24X but it really needs a better reticle.
The dot is much easier on my eyes and I shoot smaller groups with that scope. It could be the magnification but I don't think so.
That said I also have a dot in a 3X Leupold M8 and it is too small for field use. I think there is something wrong with the scope and it needs to take a trip to Oregon for a new duplex reticle.
01 September 2014, 04:26
TexKDThe only advantage of the Fine Duplex is that it does not over as much target if that suits you. Therefore it can allow for a more precision shot.
While the Leupold Fine Duplex is what I have in my higher power scope on my target/varmint 223 bolt rifle, I like the VX-6 so much that I am considering changing to a VX with the firedot and its more hunting style Duplex on that rifle too.
05 September 2014, 07:27
Stonecreekquote:
Originally posted by sambarman338:
The Lee dot seems to have a great reputation, perhaps dating from when posts and plain crosshairs were about the only alternatives.
How are they for shooting varmints at long distances?
Not particularly well-adapted, in my opinion. When shooting at varmints you are almost always holding off -- either due to wind, or to distance, or both. The dot provides no visible reference for holdover or "Kentucky" windage. A Duplex crosshair provides some useful reference. A reticle like Leupold's Varmint Hunter or B&C is even better.
In instances where the dot is the exact point of aim on a target sufficiently larger than the dot, it can be helpful in providing a psychological surrogate for the bullet's impact point and thus may be helpful, particularly in offhand shooting.