The Accurate Reloading Forums
OW's LIVE African Wildlife Photos

This topic can be found at:
https://forums.accuratereloading.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/1411043/m/775106911

24 February 2004, 05:33
Outdoor Writer
OW's LIVE African Wildlife Photos
Decided to move my photos out of Saeed's thread for faster DLing. These were all taken in June 2003 in RSA. -TONY
















24 February 2004, 05:37
interboat
That may well be the best lion shot I have ever seen anywhere.
24 February 2004, 05:43
BFaucett
The lion is a fantastic photo! I also really like the Leopard in the tree. VERY nice photos. I wish I could take photos like that.

Thanks for sharing them.
-Bob F.
24 February 2004, 05:57
RAC
You are a great photographer, sir.
24 February 2004, 06:04
mikehjd
Excellent photos. What kind of camera and lens were you using? Film or digital.
Mike
24 February 2004, 08:30
Outdoor Writer
Thanks for the kudos, guys.

I'd like to say taking good photos came naturally, but it didn't. It took many years of practice to get it right. I'll be adding a few more here over the next few days.

mikehjd,

I actually used both digital and film cameras, but the photos uploaded here are all digitals because I haven't scanned any of the 35mm slides yet. I will be doing some in the near future, though.

My digital is an Olympus 2100 Ultra Zoom, which has a 10X optical zoom. It takes fantastic photos for being only 2.1 MB resolution. -TONY
24 February 2004, 11:59
Scrollcutter
Wonderfull pics. I hope you will post more. The lion is the best I have seen as well.
24 February 2004, 13:02
Nickudu
Exquisito Antonito! I'm sure I've seen the lion photo somewhere??
24 February 2004, 13:07
Lorenzo
That lion looks exactly as my girlfriend mother

Very nice pictures
LG
24 February 2004, 15:50
Gringo Cazador
Very good, please post more, Leopard gets my vote.
25 February 2004, 07:38
Outdoor Writer
Nickudu,



If you mean published in a magazine, no. I haven't marketed any of the Africa photos to any publications yet. The only published ones are those in a John X Safaris ad on pg. 93 of the African Sporting Gazette Vol. 9, Issue 2. It's the one with the nyala on the cover. So about the only place you might have seen the lion would have been in another message somewhere or perhaps in the album I added to the African Hunter magazine site a while back.



Lorenzo,



I hope your girlfriend took after her dad in regards to her looks. If not, please tell her to be very careful with those teeth.



Billy,



More to come, maybe manana. I'll start another thread and even include another leopard photo. -TONY
25 February 2004, 14:06
interboat
Tony,

I'd sue like to use that lion shot in a book I'm writing about DGR. Possible?
25 February 2004, 14:29
Outdoor Writer
Look for an email from me. Your address is correct, right? -TONY
25 February 2004, 20:07
ForrestB
Beautiful photos Tony. I have to post another one of yours here as well. I love the eyes on this lion.


26 February 2004, 01:52
pow
There's nothing like the look of the eyes of a predator. Captivating and chilling, they rivet me and compel me to want to delve deeper into the experience of the animal.
26 February 2004, 01:59
Hobie
These are wicked cool. Your practice certainly paid off! Thanks for sharing with the rest of us.
26 February 2004, 06:11
Outdoor Writer
Forrest,

Hey, wanna a job as my PR agent??

I was going to put that one is another new thread for the sake of faster DLs per thread, but I'll just add some others, maybe later today. Did you grab that one from the album at African Hunter? -TONY
27 February 2004, 06:36
Outdoor Writer
Here's another lion pic for you. -TONY


27 February 2004, 09:55
JudgeG
There's only one word for the last lion photo... REGAL!

Great pics.
27 February 2004, 10:56
.44
Get these published somewhere.....they're some of the best I've seen.
27 February 2004, 11:43
30ott6
Tony- Great job! How about putting some of these pics in the new AR book? Front and rear cover? I love the lion photo. Thanks for posting!
27 February 2004, 13:51
pow
I thought the snarling lion was stunning, but that last one is one of the most gorgeous photos I've ever seen. Congrats on a fine job.
27 February 2004, 16:51
Andrew McLaren
Very nice photos. And with a relatively simple digital! Post some more anytime.

Lorenzo, Have you ever thought that your nice kitty-cat girlfriend may grow older to look like her mother?

Verewaaier.
27 February 2004, 17:28
Socrates
Last one looks like you did a little Photoshop lighting on it, but, the overall affect, and quality of your pictures, is really incredible. Getting that close to a Leopard, or lion, with even a 10X lense, is, well, my hat's off to you.

I would have a hard time taking those pics, unless I had my camera mounted on a 458 Lott...

s
28 February 2004, 00:10
Boghossian
Hi,
Was the pic of the King Cheetah taken in a reserve? They are quite rare, but I heard they are being bred specially in RSA or Namibia...
28 February 2004, 09:25
goosejoe
Very nice OW! What were you doing to that first lion? He looks pretty mad!!!!!!!!Is there a story to go with the picture? Thanks joe
28 February 2004, 11:07
tsheltont
I'm going to Botswana in mid-March, and just bought a new Olympus C-750 UltraZoom, which also has a 10x optical zoom but with 4 megapixels. I am not a seasoned photographer, but would like to get some good wildlife close-ups without getting too close to those teeth. So far I have found that at 10X it's tough not to get a little movement without a tripod. Do you have any suggestions that don't require me to use the more esoteric of what seem to be hundreds of settings on the C-750?
28 February 2004, 12:00
Outdoor Writer
Okay, I'm going to try to cover a bunch in this one reply.



First, an overall thanks to everyone for the complimnets. And now, I'll answer those who had more specific comments or questions.



.44,



Oh, at least some of them will get published somewhere eventually. That's how I buy groceries. I just need to beat down some crocs nipping at my backside first, then start marketing the photos.



30ott6,



I have no idea what "AR book" you mean. Does it pay real money and are you involved with it??



Socrates,



A bit of background darkening. Photo was shot in very warm, early eveing light, as well.



Boghossian.



Yes on the king cheetah. It, as well as those of the well-maned lions, were taken at Tshukudu, a very large reserve just outside Kruger NP. Some of the other critters were taken within or near the park or on concessions I hunted earlier on my 18-day trip to RSA. And congrats for recognizing that as a king cheetah. Here's one of the normal sorts. Her name is Savanah.







goosejoe,



Tshukudu has an extensive lion breeding program in place, and this old boy is one of their prime studs. He didn't like us intruding on his space, so started a bit of a roaring session. The other nearby lions joined in. Other than an elk bugle within 10 yards of me while I was bowhunting, it was the most incredible sound I've heard in the wild. Being so close, the roar was extremely loud and enough to raise goosebumps. The lions carried on for a 1/2 hr. Unfortunately, it was twilight when it started, so I had only a few minutes of shooting light.



tsheltont,



Yes, the 740/750 came about to replace the 2100. Unfortunately, Olympus, for whatever reason, didn't include the image stabilization feature of the 2100. So handholding it at 10X is iffy at best and requires a fast shutter speed for sharp images.



My suggestion is to use the shutter-preferred mode if the 750 offers it and set the "film" ISA to higher speed, such as 400 or 800. Also, brace the camera anyway you can. Even a single staff or monopod will help steady it. Or rest on the hood of a vehicle, a tree limb or anything else that is handy.



Now for the MOST important suggestions: READ THE MANUAL and do learn how to use some of those "esoteric" functions by actually TESTING them BEFORE you leave the USA.



There is no sense travelling that far, spending that much money and NOT getting good pix! Fortunately, with digitals, you can preview and delete the garbage. BUT...if you're shooting wildlife, you might not get a second chance to take more than one pic that could become the most memorable highlight of your trip. Been there, done that all too many times with a film camera over the past 25 years.



So make the first one count.
28 February 2004, 15:01
Kev



Outstanding pics,Kev
29 February 2004, 08:00
Outdoor Writer
Thanks, Kev.

Here's another puttitat. -TONY


29 February 2004, 08:15
ErikD
Tony,

Thanks for your kind comment about my pics, but, your animal pictures are truelly amazing! I'm very jealous! I have some good animal pics from our trip, but they're all on Fuji Provia 100 slides, and I don't have a scanner... Most of our "serious" pictures were taken with the 35mm, but in retrospect I think I would have brought a good digital SLR on the trip instead. It would have made it a lot easier to have it all together on harddisk and CD backups than the 3000 slides we have in addition to 3500 digitals...

Well, we live and learn!

Erik D.

www.dunia.no
29 February 2004, 08:36
Scrollcutter
ForrestB

That critter should be on a floorplate.



They are all very nice photos, by the way!
29 February 2004, 17:41
rslus
Tony:

A friend of mine is looking for some photos of Giraffes in the wild so they can use in some paintings. Anything available?

please email directlt to me at rslus@localnet.com

Thanks,
Bob S.
29 February 2004, 23:09
Boghossian
Hey OW, is it true magazines don't accept pics that have already been displayed? Don't they reserve all rights?
Also, is it true that pictures for magazines generally have to be on slides (or do they accept digital pics now?).
Lastly, do magazines generally get their pictures from
-The gunwriters
-Pro photographers in national parks
-Hunter/Photographers like yourself?
I know that OL once had a tame leopard on the front cover (can see chain if you look closely?) but are all those 6x6 elk from Yellowstone???
01 March 2004, 06:16
Outdoor Writer
Erik,

I hauled my 35mm gear and shot a bunch of K64 slides because many publications still are in the dark ages in regards to digitals. Although I have a scanner, I haven't had any time to scan! Heck, I haven't even sorted through them yet.

My next major photo equipment purchase will be one of the Canon SLR digital bodies so I can use my cadre of lenses with it. One of my sons just bought the 10D, and it takes super pix. -TONY
08 March 2004, 04:38
Outdoor Writer

Quote:

A friend of mine is looking for some photos of Giraffes in the wild so they can use in some paintings.




rslus,

Finally had a chance to go through some of my 35mm slides. I didn't shoot too many giraffe photos, but I scanned two of the ones I had. See the OW's LIVE African Wildlife Photos #2 thread.
08 March 2004, 05:00
Harry
I sure do enjoy your photos.
08 March 2004, 05:18
Outdoor Writer
Quote:

Hey OW, is it true magazines don't accept pics that have already been displayed? Don't they reserve all rights?








Boghossian,



If by "displayed" you mean published, the mileage will vary, depending on the exact *rights* of publication the original and subsequent sales entail. There are "first-time" publication rights, second, etc., as well as EXCLUSIVE (ALL) rights to publication. These are normally all negotiable and can affect the amount paid for each photo.



Obviously selling one under EXCLUSIVE rights -- i.e. -- whoever buys it will be the SOLE buyer and be able to publish it without anyone else doing same -- will bring the highest fee and often, but not always, means the photographer loses the copyright for that particular photo. IOW, the buyer gets ALL rights as indicated. I NEVER sell away my copyright to a photo, however.



The key in all of it is making any/each subsequent buyer aware of previous publication(s) and what rights are being sold. Heck, I have one photo that has been published at least 10 times; it's made me lots of money.



RE: digital images



A lot has changed over the past few years in this regards. Although many publications still prefer transparencies, the upgrading of good scanning technology has allowed them to use even 3"x5" prints, as long as they are sharp and well exposed.



Same goes for images straight from digital cameras. I have one publication where most of what I provide them are either digital in-camera images or 300 dpi TIF scans I do of prints that are sent to me by guides, outfitters, etc.



The newer breed of SLR-type digicams that use lenses from normal 35mm SLRs have even made it better now. The quality of a published image is very, very close to what a transparency will produce. Although my little Olympus 2100 does a good job, a Canon body of this type will be one of my next major purchases so I can take advantage of the lenses I already own.



Quote:

Lastly, do magazines generally get their pictures from








Again, there's no difinitive source of published photos, but in general...



Some writers such as myself supply the photos for our OWN articles. Other writers merely write and the publication will seek photos from photographers such as me if they are the general type of hunting/fishing ones or live wildlife. In any case, editors always like it when a writer can supply quality images to illustrate their own articles. Plus, the writer often gets paid more for a complete package.



Quote:

but are all those 6x6 elk from Yellowstone???






You mean like this one?







Many are; some aren't. The reason so many are taken under "controlled" conditions is simple: a guy making a LIVING with photo sales can't spends days in the woods trying to get these types of pix. Even if a 6x6 just happened to come within camera range, the odds are the guy would get one photo before the critter spooked at the sound of the shutter clicking or the film winder running.



Now, here again, MISREPRESENTING something is a different animal altogether. In other words, showing an elk as an elk on a cover is one thing; saying it was taken somewhere it wasn't would be something different and not too ethical.



Hope the answered your questions. -TONY
08 March 2004, 14:48
ForrestB
Roger, sorry I missed your note. You're right - he belongs on someone's floor plate. But, I'm afraid, not mine. I've always liked to admire really nice game scenes on rifles, but never desired them on my own rifles.

Birds on shotguns appeal to me though. I can't explain that one.