06 June 2016, 11:07
Black LechweSeems the antis are also anti not-hunting!
So when a conservation organisation wants to move elephants from two crowded parks to a large, understocked park, guess who comes to the party with cries of 'DON'T! It might be stressful and they might not like the food...'
I wonder if they have really thought this one through, or if they just object to everything as a matter of principle.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/...160602111457159.html06 June 2016, 23:52
Use Enough GunBoth. They have not thought anything through, AND they object to everything as a matter of principle. Totally emotion driven fools with no scientific, statistical or logical backup.
quote:
Originally posted by Use Enough Gun:
Both. They have not thought anything through, AND they object to everything as a matter of principle. Totally emotion driven fools with no scientific, statistical or logical backup.
Basically wha you are saying they a bunch of bloody ignorant idiots!
And you are right of course

07 June 2016, 09:42
JBoutfishnquote:
Originally posted by Use Enough Gun:
Both. They have not thought anything through, AND they object to everything as a matter of principle. Totally emotion driven fools with no scientific, statistical or logical backup.
What he said.

07 June 2016, 12:03
Black LechweI know good journalism seeks to get some different opinions on a topic... but Al Jazeera slipped up on this one, deciding to 'balance' their article with two quotes from totally irrelevant organisations.