Could you buy factory ammo or cases for it in Africa?
Mike
Lotta folk reasoned that the difference in performance between a 30-06 and a 300H&H wasn't worth the candle and opted for either a 30-06 or a 300 Win Mag, for which PMP made both ammo AND brass.
There are some savvy hunters out there who use one. I plan to be one of them - I want one to match my 375 Mauser, so they are as near a matching pair as possible.
I believe PMP are now making the brass
------------------
I hunt, not to kill, but in order not to have played golf.
[This message has been edited by Pete Millan (edited 04-16-2001).]
Sounds like we are on the same wave lenght except mine all Model 70 375s.
I have neber owned one but I had quite a bit of involement with 3 of them in the 1970s. A Pre 64 Super Grade, A Sako anda Browning Supreme.
All three were good and all three gave very good velocity.
If I run fired 375 cases through my 300 H&H dies they crinkle at the shoulder but new 387 cases go OK with just the very smallest of crinkles that you can feel but can't really see.
Huntingtons list form dies for 375 to 300 H&H and they are cheap enough.
It is interesting that the 375 was such a success across the world but its little brother never made it.
Mike
Frank N.
quote:Are you sure this is true? I understand that at one time the .300 H&H was a strong seller in the Model 70 Winchester -- it had, I think a stainless steel barrel. Some of these were later rechambered to 300 Weatherby. I also understand that the H&H ultimately lost favor because people decided that it didn't offer enough velocity increase over the 30/06, and that this was the main reason Winchester developed the 300 Win. Mag.
Originally posted by Mike375:
It is interesting that the 375 was such a success across the world but its little brother never made it.Mike
Can anyone here confirm whether all (or any) of this is true?
------------------
..Mac >>>===(x)===>
------------------
Ray Atkinson
On the subject of one caliber for everything.
When it comes to 375s and the like, their performance is deemed as being OK on bigger animals.
Thus when we get down to a caliber that is a do anything caliber, I think the smaller game performance is the key. Also smaller game will be where the most shooting will be done and hence exposure to a caliber's weaknesses is more likely to be observed.
The 3 calibers that I have used the most on pigs and kangaroos are the 270, 300 Win and 375. I have used or seen used about everything else from 218 Bee to 460 Wby, but not for the same number of animals.
Bigger than 375 is out once you start doing a lot of shooting, especially from improvised rests.
My best success has come with the 375.The 270 and 300 Win a more critical with bullets. Usually the problem will be they are too hard.
I think the 375 becuase of the bigger diameter and a greater tendency to use blunter bullets allows it to work OK over a much greater number of animals and time. "Time" because it components vary over the years.
The 338 does not seem to do as well. However I think that might be because shooters have a greater tendency to use hard spitzers in them.
For me at least, the 375 has offered the greatest combination of effectiveness, ease of component availability and pleasure of ownership and use of any caliber that I have owned.
Mike
quote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
Mac,
I'd bet my a$$ and half of Georgia that you could get by with just the 300 H&H if you had to....
LMAO,, I have a great feeling you would win that bet, but just in case your wrong, how about selling me "Sweet Thang" and you use your 300 H&H !
------------------
..Mac >>>===(x)===>
------------------
Ray Atkinson