Are there any opinion about using bullets that weighs more than 300 grains such as a 350 grain Woodleigh for buffalo?
Has anyone used the 350 grain or 380 grain Rhino line of bullets in a .375 H&H for buffalo?
Thanks for the suggestions.
My own experince is with only the 300 grain Barnes X.
They work very well, so I have not tried anything besides them.
I think any one of the permiums - Nosler, Bear Claws, Barnes X, Gs Custom will work fine. I will stick with the 300 grain.
------------------
saeed@ emirates.net.ae
www.accuratereloading.com
George
------------------
Shoot straight, shoot often, but by all means, use enough gun!
Rich Elliott
------------------
Ethiopian Rift Valley Safaris
I have seen some premium softs slide off on frontal shots and go under the shoulder and along the ribs, so I only use solids, either woodliegh or Hornadys, but today I only use one bullet for Buffalo and that is the GS flat nosed solid...
The smaller the caliber, the more important the solid IMHO.
I won't argue the solid normally kills Buffalo a little slower, but I also know it will kill Buffalo surer..Most every Buffalo I have trailed up or assisted in trailing up was shot with a soft that failed or a BarnesX that pinched shut and turned.
------------------
Ray Atkinson
The above recommendations are good ones.
I have used the 300 grain Swift A-Frame in a 375 H&H to break the neck of a water buffalo, killing it instantly. It also worked well on the blacktail Sitka deer of Kodiak Island (loaded for bear there) in a 375 Weatherby.
The old steel jacketed Hornady FMJ's are superbly acurate (1/2 MOA) and punched holes in 3/4" steel plate for me, in 375 H&H. I have a stock pile of them too, as Rich mentioned he has.
The 300 grain Barnes-X will not go wrong if it shoots well in your rifle. That is what I took to Botswana for plains game and as backup on cape buffalo should my 416 Rigby get trashed. It didn't. My load was 72.0 grains of RL-15 with the 300 X in a 24" 375 H&H, giving 2528 fps and 3/4 MOA.
The GSC bullets of HV persuasion are 240, 250, and 265 grains. The FN is 270 grains. From reports, the 265 HV or the 270 FN are more than adequate for buffalo.
I am superstitious about using only 300 grain bullets in the 375's on buffalo. That is why I am holding out for a matched pair of bullets from GSC in 300 grain HV and FN.
I think maybe Saeed would start shooting the GSC's in his 375/404 if the 300 grain weight becomes available.
I stop at 300 grains in the 375. You will not get better performance in going beyond this to the 350 grain bullet, IMHO.
------------------
RAB
Probably somebody took a quartering away shot with a .375 soft and the bullet never got past the paunch. When I found the buffalo, he was fit as a fiddle, until he was shot with a real bullet.
Anyone who shoots a buffalo in the gut just ahead of the butt quartering away should expect a failure like this, especially if using a soft.
Another point in favor of solids on buffalo. Chalk another one up for Ray. Make mine GSC FN's, 270 grainers only if I can't get the 300 grainer.
------------------
RAB
This is because they will not penetrate as well as a faster moving 300 grain bullet in the 375 H&H.
And, at the slower velocity of the 350 grainers in the 375 H&H (at safe pressures!) the 0.049" jacket on the Barnes Originals is unreliable in opening up, and if it does, it is prone too shed the core. A no win situation.
Ever wonder why they stopped making them? A bonded core bullet is called for instead, and maybe a bigger cartridge to move the bullet faster if real increase in performance is needed, over the 300 grainer.
I do believe the 350 grain Woodleighs would open up and hold together better, but they really offer little to be gained from the 375 rifle other than extra recoil.
300 grains is king of the 375 bullets, IMHO, and FWIW...2 cents?
Now if I can ever find some 300 grain GSC FN and HV bullets, I can forsake the 300 grain Swift, Nosler, Hornady, Sierra, and Barnes bullets.
------------------
DaggaRon
RAB
------------------
Ray Atkinson