[This message has been edited by Terry P (edited 04-27-2002).]
I want some power. The 470 is fine, but the 500 is more of a good thing. But if you do not reload, then the 470 is probably a better choice due to ammo availability.
------------------
Ray Atkinson
Todd E
I asked Richard Harland this question, and he giggled at the question. Damn, I was hoping he was going to insist that a 500 was much better than a 470 and I could justify a new purchase (when I had the scratch).
Considering the cost of a new 500 & ammunition, shot placement, etc., I guess he was right. Poop.
Will
My answer was given on the premise the you currently owned neither a 470 or a 500. Therefore I chose my preference. I am not saying that if you already have a 470 to go get a 500. To me that would be somewhat redundant. The 500 is a bit better, but not enough to justify owning both. If I had a 470 and wanted a better stopper I would not get a 500 I would get a 577.
This is my current position and the Boss still says no. Her position is since I am not going back to Africa anytime soon (because she won't so I can't) I don't need another "elephant gun".
Todd E
Todd E
From what I have read the .577 sometimes doesn't have penetration like a 470, 500, 500 Jeffery, or the Lott. If I were looking for a new SxS I think it would be a 500 NE.
Or another 470. The problem with trying to switch to the second 470 in a pinch is that the gunbearer would be dissappearing over the hill when you turn to grab it!
Will
[This message has been edited by Will (edited 04-27-2002).]
BigB
I once watched a video of Peter Capstick shoot an elepant with a .470 and it didn't impress that bull elephant much before running off with two shots to the heart/lung area.
I have never heard anyone say that a 577 NE did not have enough penetration. I am speaking of people that have taken game with the 577. I have also been told by those in the know that the 577 generally has about the same penetration as the 500. That is not to say that the 577 will penetrate as deeply as a high performance bolt action cartridge which is loaded to higher pressure and velocity. I am only saying that the 577 has enough penetration to get the job done.
As far as the marital issues, I think I am winning. She just got a new Jag so I am now entitled to something nice! I am thinking Searcy Underlever Deluxe 577 NE!!! Drives better than any car!
Todd E
[This message has been edited by Todd E (edited 04-27-2002).]
I'm heading out in August to chase those ele's again, or vice versa.
I just bought the wife her first car, a 1976 VW Beattle that needs restoring, but it runs sometimes. That makes us even, heh?
Will
Having the gun in your hands when you need it, and shooting quickly and accurately when the time comes is more important than brute size or "KO" values.
That makes a 500 NE about the tops for me, but a 470 NE will do nicely. As would also a 450 NE or 450 NE #2, maybe just under 10 pounds? That might be the ultimate. To heck with recoil on any of them. It is just portability and swingability that is important, so you can hit well and fast when up close.
5000 ft-lbs. and a good bullet are more than enough for any job, if the shooter hits the mark.
------------------
RAB
Downside is the .577 is too heavy to pack, gun bearers are fewer these days ( they don't do window either ), Cost is too much to pack around on airlines; and recoil is heineous! that pretty much voids the great old .577
------------------
Ray Atkinson