The Accurate Reloading Forums
Curious. Solids or soft points for African game.
20 February 2008, 21:27
Michael RobinsonCurious. Solids or soft points for African game.
quote:
Originally posted by JPK:
BTW, was that the Protected Point or the standard round nose?
JPK
That is a standard 500 grain Woodleigh Weldcore RNSP, not the PP. Fired into the chest of a cape buffalo on a frontal shot from a .458 Lott at just under 2,300 fps.
Mike
Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
20 February 2008, 22:50
465H&HIf you want to maximize penetration on buffalo with Woodleigh soft points in the 458s, try the 550 grain soft. It can be loaded to 2,150 fps from the Lott and over 2,000 fps in the standard 458 Win. Maybe even a little more if your magazine and throat will allow you to seat it out. You will find substantially more penetration than withe 500 grain Woodleigh at higher velocities.
The soft point on the far right was recovered from a large buff bull shot at 125 yards from my Lott at 2,150 fps. It entered the quartering away buff at the front edge of the right ham, went through the stomach, diaphram. left lung, rib cage, left shoulder blade, shoulder meat and was found under the hide. It retained 74.9% of it's weight. Outstanding performance.
20 February 2008, 23:27
Willquote:
Originally posted by 465H&H:
If you want to maximize penetration on buffalo with Woodleigh soft points in the 458s, try the 550 grain soft. It can be loaded to 2,150 fps from the Lott and over 2,000 fps in the standard 458 Win. Maybe even a little more if your magazine and throat will allow you to seat it out. You will find substantially more penetration than withe 500 grain Woodleigh at higher velocities.
The soft point on the far right was recovered from a large buff bull shot at 125 yards from my Lott at 2,150 fps. It entered the quartering away buff at the front edge of the right ham, went through the stomach, diaphram. left lung, rib cage, left shoulder blade, shoulder meat and was found under the hide. It retained 74.9% of it's weight. Outstanding performance.
I sound like a broken record but Taylor and the Penetration Index strike again!
-------------------------------
Will / Once you've been amongst them, there is no such thing as too much gun.
---------------------------------------
and, God Bless John Wayne. NRA Benefactor, GOA, NAGR
_________________________
"Elephant and Elephant Guns" $99 shipped.
“Hunting Africa's Dangerous Game" $20 shipped.
red.dirt.elephant@gmail.com
_________________________
If anything be of note, let it be he was once an elephant hunter, hoping to wind up where elephant hunters go.
21 February 2008, 04:17
shootawaysledghammer test[URL=

]a[/URL]458cal 500gr Barnes banded solid,500gr TSX,500gr TBBC,500gr A-Frame,550gr Woodleigh FMJ
22 February 2008, 01:02
RIPquote:
Originally posted by shootaway:
sledghammer test[URL=

]a[/URL]458cal 500gr Barnes banded solid,500gr TSX,500gr TBBC,500gr A-Frame,550gr Woodleigh FMJ
Quite the lineup there! Not all .458 caliber are they?
What was the test medium and impact velocity for each bullet, Sir?
Pretty meaningless unless we know more.
22 February 2008, 01:19
shootawayHello RIP! An equal number of hits from the hammer.As you can see from the picture of the helmet this was not a fun test.I caught the Barnes Banded solid in the knee and almost broke it-my knee.[URL=

]a[/URL] All 458 caliber.The bullet toughness test is nearly complete.I'am still not decided on which bullet to go with for a cape buff hunt.The Barnes Banded solid was the toughest.A small chunk broke off and it was burning hot.I stocked up on 500 gr TSX bullets because I really like them.I did a search for past experiences with the Woodleigh FMJ and did not find much.I think that only bullet that will stay straight after a heavy impact is the Barnes Banded solid.The TSX is not far off for straightness.That hammer would sure bounce of the Barnes Banded solid.I also liked the toughness of the Woodleigh.It is a bullet that will give a bit but stay completely together after a severe pounding.
22 February 2008, 01:59
218 Bee[/QUOTE]
Quite the lineup there! Not all .458 caliber are they?
What was the test medium and impact velocity for each bullet, Sir?
Pretty meaningless unless we know more.[/QUOTE]
And utterly meaningless now that we do. Unless of course there's a buff out there wearing a helmet and armed with a sledgehammer...
Sigh.
Mark
DRSS
"I always take care to fire into the nearest hillside and, lacking that, into darkness." - the late Dr. Hunter S. Thompson
22 February 2008, 02:55
RIPDitto on the sigh.

22 February 2008, 09:04
375 fanaticBeware Mr Milkman/Postman shootaway is ready for you
"Buy land they have stopped making it"- Mark Twain
22 February 2008, 09:27
MacifejThe "Moron-a-Thon" was cancelled with Beavis & Butthead was it not??

23 February 2008, 00:41
AtkinsonRIP,
Next time use the hammer end of the axe!

Ray Atkinson
Atkinson Hunting Adventures
10 Ward Lane,
Filer, Idaho, 83328
208-731-4120
rayatkinsonhunting@gmail.com
23 February 2008, 08:31
RIPquote:
Originally posted by Atkinson:
RIP,
Next time use the hammer end of the axe!
Ray,
Your comment is about as assinine as shootaway.

23 February 2008, 09:49
Rat MotorI tried to cut down a tree with one of these. Didnt work either.
23 February 2008, 10:00
MacifejHey where are ALF and Warrior??
They must have some pseudo-scientific commentary on the validity of projectile testing using the "Axe and Helmet" method??

23 February 2008, 10:46
Rat MotorAlf is not the right man to comment here. He deals in facts. The right man to give comment here is Warrior. How about a complete analysis of axe v sledge and weight of percussion tool v speed of swing. Dont forget to comment on the arc of visibility with the helmet pictured compared to those that you have used.

23 February 2008, 11:03
MacifejI was wanting to hear about the ALF-a-centauric interplanetary quadratic equation for calculating laminar flow and supercavitation dynamics on the leading edge of a Chinese made Axe head during the supersonic/subsonic gas/solid medium transition.