THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM MODERN MILITARY RIFLES FORUM

Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
california judge decision
 Login/Join
 
one of us
posted
just caughgt on the new that a federal judge overturned californias assault weapon ban
 
Posts: 13201 | Location: faribault mn | Registered: 16 November 2004Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 143 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 16 April 2019Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Good move but remarkable for California.


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NormanConquest:
Good move but remarkable for California.


Somebody noticed that the Founding Fathers encouraged citizens to own the most advanced military weapons of the day (rifles, as opposed to muskets).

The United States Army would not buy the early Gatling guns, no place for that kind of thing in the doctrines.
Officers bought then with private funds to equip their troops.
After a small contingent held off a much larger band of Indians with one, they reconsidered.


TomP

Our country, right or wrong. When right, to be kept right, when wrong to be put right.

Carl Schurz (1829 - 1906)
 
Posts: 12629 | Location: Moreno Valley CA USA | Registered: 20 November 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
I ultimately come back to the fact in the late 1870s the US Army was giving Military Ammo away to civilian, US Citizen, Bison hunters.

In addition, after the Fed. Government was birthed, no Congress ever thought it had the stoke to ban any firearms. Not even in the 1930s, which is why Congress ultimately only taxed certain weapons.
 
Posts: 4387 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Judge Benitez has issued/authored other pro 2nd amendment rulings.

They all have been shot down on appeal.

None have made it to the supreme court.

I believe that they are written for the supreme court.

If any one of them makes it to a supreme court hearing .

They will have the legal background to help get a favorable ruling.
 
Posts: 17040 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Beretta682E
posted Hide Post
Joke of a legal ruling that is going to get slapped down by 9th circuit court of appeals and won’t even be looked on by the supreme court.


District court federal judges don’t rewrite Heller.

Mike


Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.

Bernard Baruch
 
Posts: 11995 | Location: Cocoa Beach, Florida | Registered: 22 July 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of NormanConquest
posted Hide Post
Kinda funny in a way. I just recalled a line from the movie "Billy Jack" in 1970, "When the law breaks the law there is no law."


Never mistake motion for action.
 
Posts: 14845 | Location: Austin, Texas | Registered: 11 March 2013Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2021 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia