quote:

Originally posted by p dog shooter:

quote:

We are not at the top of the food chain - even if we are armed with the appropriate "deterrent".

Yes we are other wise we would not need all the laws protecting the animals from us.

More wisdom from the long time Alaskan resident, P-diddy shooter.

quote:

Originally posted by p dog shooter:

quote:

Originally posted by p dog shooter:
An increase in bear population along with an increase in human actively.

Results more human bear conflict.

A statement I'll stand by.

I am abit fuzzy about how you gained all your expertise on the biology of Alaskan bears and their population growth ?
All the hundreds of RHAK members in the state are crying about not enough bears to go around.

quote:

Originally posted by 458Win:

quote:

Originally posted by p dog shooter:

quote:

Originally posted by p dog shooter:
An increase in bear population along with an increase in human actively.

Results more human bear conflict.

A statement I'll stand by.

I am abit fuzzy about how you gained all your expertise on the biology of Alaskan bears and their population growth ?
All the hundreds of RHAK members in the state are crying about not enough bears to go around.

I am a bit fuzzy about your math if one has more bears in area. If one has more humans using that area.

Why wouldn't one have more bear human interactions.

The area covered can be very localized.

It is my understanding that in some units in AK one can shoot more then one bear per season.

Sounds like the same whining I hear from hunters in Wis. and other states.

If they are not seeing a trophy animal behind every tree.

There is not any out there.

quote:

Originally posted by chuck375:
If you want to be safe stay out of the wilderness and stay in the cities (oh never mind they're lots of 2 legged predators there, another reason to carry a handgun)

I prefer the bears over the crips, bloods or ms-13 !!