THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM WILDCAT FORUM


Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
450 Ackley Magnum/458 Lott
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
Been doing a bit of reading on the 450 Ackley Mag. From what I understand, the case is a bit longer than the 458 Lott and it has a slight shoulder. So basically an improved 375 H&H case necked up to 458. Does anyone have a typical reamer print for the 450 Ackley? I'm curious about the case taper per inch(easy extraction?). Can a 458 Lott cartridge be fired in a rifle with a 450 Ackley chamber? I'm not necessarily interested in an increase in performance, if any, but I don't like looking at a 458 Lott case that is buldging towards the case mouth from the seated bullet. Like this:


Just looks ugly...

And while I'm at it, I might have a reamer made for the case length of the 458 Lott instead of the H&H case length and call it the 458 Lott improved(sorta). Probably not worth the effort, but it sounds fun to me...




Sent from my iPhone
 
Posts: 661 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 15 June 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The .450 Ackley can fire the Watts, Lott and Win.Mag.
 
Posts: 200 | Registered: 02 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of waterrat
posted Hide Post
Win Mag ??


I tend to use more than enough gun
 
Posts: 1407 | Location: lake iliamna alaska | Registered: 10 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
This is a cartridge on the left that was fireformed in my Enfield that is marked 450-500 Express. The brass on the right is a 458 Lott brass. The Lott looks shorter, but it isn't. I've always thought of it as a 450 Ackley Magnum. I can't find info on the 450-500 Express.
 
Posts: 8959 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Butch, that's an interesting cartridge. Id like to know its origin and specifics. Have you ever done a chamber cast on that Enfield?

I got ahold of JGS and they were kind enough to send me a reamer print for the 450 Ack Mag. The first thing that catches my eye is the body taper. It's only 0.0041" per inch. That seems very "straight". It seems that one would experience sticky extraction with a taper like that. Especially when you consider how hot Ackley liked to load his cartridges. I figured that .0065-.007 is as low as one would want to go. I did notice that the 470 Capstick had had a taper of .006" per inch. Maybe I should make a post on the Big Bore section to see if any 470 Capstick shooters experience troublesome extraction. The 450 Ackley chamber also had a neck diameter of .490" at the front where the 458 Lott is spec'd at .483". Is be curious to know what the taper is on a loaded 458 Lott case from the case mouth to the base of the bullet. SAAMI shows the chamber having .012 per inch of taper from the case mouth to the belt. Surely the "neck" of a loaded 458 Lott case doesn't possess that much taper. Any thoughts?




Sent from my iPhone
 
Posts: 661 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 15 June 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Here is the best measurements from the fired brass and the cerrosafe cast. The OAL is 2.880, the neck is approx .400 long, the shoulder is .508, the base just above measures .512.
I hope that this helps. Like I say, the barrel is marked 450-500 Express. I wish I knew more about it.
 
Posts: 8959 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of Whitworth
posted Hide Post
This is a photo of a loaded .458 Lott (left) next to a loaded .450 Ackley.




"Ignorance you can correct, you can't fix stupid." JWP

If stupidity hurt, a lot of people would be walking around screaming.

Semper Fidelis

"Building Carpal Tunnel one round at a time"
 
Posts: 13440 | Location: Virginia | Registered: 10 July 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Whitworth:
This is a photo of a loaded .458 Lott (left) next to a loaded .450 Ackley.



Could you check your measurements and compare them to mine? My picture of a fireformed case came out with a shorter neck than my cerrosafe cast. Indicates the 458 Lott basic brass is too short.
 
Posts: 8959 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
For reference:





Sent from my iPhone
 
Posts: 661 | Location: Missouri | Registered: 15 June 2014Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of tiggertate
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by +Templar+:
Butch, that's an interesting cartridge. Id like to know its origin and specifics. Have you ever done a chamber cast on that Enfield?

I got ahold of JGS and they were kind enough to send me a reamer print for the 450 Ack Mag. The first thing that catches my eye is the body taper. It's only 0.0041" per inch. That seems very "straight". It seems that one would experience sticky extraction with a taper like that. Especially when you consider how hot Ackley liked to load his cartridges. I figured that .0065-.007 is as low as one would want to go. I did notice that the 470 Capstick had had a taper of .006" per inch. Maybe I should make a post on the Big Bore section to see if any 470 Capstick shooters experience troublesome extraction. The 450 Ackley chamber also had a neck diameter of .490" at the front where the 458 Lott is spec'd at .483". Is be curious to know what the taper is on a loaded 458 Lott case from the case mouth to the base of the bullet. SAAMI shows the chamber having .012 per inch of taper from the case mouth to the belt. Surely the "neck" of a loaded 458 Lott case doesn't possess that much taper. Any thoughts?


I owned one for a while and extraction was never a problem. It was a re-chambered Brno 602. I still have the reamer if your interested and a few boxes of properly stamped A-Square once-fired brass plus a few leftover Lion Loads.


"Experience" is the only class you take where the exam comes before the lesson.
 
Posts: 11137 | Location: Texas, USA | Registered: 22 September 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of PWS
posted Hide Post
Lott in Lott, Win in Lott, Win in Ack, Lott in Ack, Ack in Ack.

All fed and fired normally and developed pretty much full velocity. I personally prefer the slightly smaller and "sloppier fit" of the Lott over the Ackley in standard H&H length mag boxes.

 
Posts: 1141 | Location: Kodiak | Registered: 01 February 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I zeroed the 450 Ackley of a ph once and fired both 450 Ackley, Lott and Win Mag in it as part of the process. He had to 450 Ackleys both M70 pushfeeds and mentioned that he had experienced sticky extraction from time to time, but who knows the loads, how clean the chamber was, how hot it was in the Zambesi Valley at the time etc. It is by far the best looking cartridge in that performance range in my opinion. I think a Lott is close and cheaper and easier.
 
Posts: 688 | Location: JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA | Registered: 17 January 2013Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PWS:
Lott in Lott, Win in Lott, Win in Ack, Lott in Ack, Ack in Ack.

All fed and fired normally and developed pretty much full velocity. I personally prefer the slightly smaller and "sloppier fit" of the Lott over the Ackley in standard H&H length mag boxes.




Your 458 Lott brass fired in the 450 Ackley look just like mine.
 
Posts: 8959 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Butch, is that the Enfield you got from me 5-6 years ago?
 
Posts: 20074 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yes it is.
 
Posts: 8959 | Location: Poetry, Texas | Registered: 28 November 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I had a 450 Ackley once in a Griffin & Howe Model 70. As I understand, it uses the 375 case, but full-length. I never loaded for it, as I had plenty of Superior Ammunition for it when I got it. It's a pretty powerful 45, for sure.
 
Posts: 20074 | Location: Very NW NJ up in the Mountains | Registered: 14 June 2009Reply With Quote
Moderator
Picture of jeffeosso
posted Hide Post
can fire a lott in an ackley, but not the other way .. I've seen lott/watts fired in a ackley chamber. didn't seem to be bad results


#dumptrump

opinions vary band of bubbas and STC hunting Club

Information on Ammoguide about
the416AR, 458AR, 470AR, 500AR
What is an AR round? Case Drawings 416-458-470AR and 500AR.
476AR,
http://www.weaponsmith.com
 
Posts: 38378 | Location: Conroe, TX | Registered: 01 June 2002Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Ackley and Watt did their development in the late 50's when a H&H Belted "Basic" full cylinder case was available so they could form their brass, trim it lightly to square the mouth and still have the full 2.85" case length of the 375 H&H magnum. Lott did his work in the late 70's using 375 H&H brass, which by the time he expanded the neck and trimmed the mouth, weren't quite long enough to match the 375 length, so he settled for a case length of 2.80". Ackley 450 Magnum shouldn't fit in a Watt or Lott chamber, You might be able to jam a Watt into a Lott chamber but you shouldn't as the case is too long and the neck will have a hard time releasing the bullet causing raised pressures and possible blow-ups.
 
Posts: 421 | Location: Broomfield, CO, USA | Registered: 04 April 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I still have several new boxes of the NORMA cylindrical brass out in the shop somewhere.. It measures pretty close to the 470 Capstick.

I keep thinking I need another Lott or the Ackley, but it doesn't make much sense with an OM 70 Jim Kobe fitted a 450/375 RUM barrel to for me last year.

On the other hand, who says common sense figures into the equation?

Rich
 
Posts: 23062 | Location: SW Idaho | Registered: 19 December 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia