THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM WILDCAT FORUM

Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

Moderators: Paul H
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Odd caliber?
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
It is great to see an obscure wildcat brought back to life, especially one that is so efficient at equaling or surpassing many of the old standard DGR cartridges. tu2

If you are using Varget at about 99.4% fill (76.0) grains and getting about 2500 fps with the 300 grainer,
I estimate an 85.0% fill (65.0 grains) will give you about 2200 fps.

Perfectly safe to use 85% loads with Varget, commonly done.
No filler needed, but might not be as accurate.
You can use a filler for more uniform ignition and better accuracy.
4 or 5 grains of Dacron fluff balled up and pressed over the powder with a pencil eraser or dowel, then seat the bullet over that.
You can use a filler with Varget and it will be like a common loading for the Nitro Express doubles.
Less recoil than using a slower powder with a heavier charge weight for same velocity.

Better filler, what I use now, is the foam backer rod used in caulking. A 1/2" long cylinder of 1/2" foam rod ought to do.
Might weigh one grain, if that.
Get a little package of that from Menard's, Lowe's, Home Depot, or local hardware store for a couple of bucks.
Cut plugs from that with a sharp blade.
It vanishes on firing.
The Dacron fluff produces a little blizzard with each shot.

Or if you want to get really low velocities, try AA 5744. No filler needed even with a half-full case. It is a powder standard for reduced loads using no fillers.
Try a 1/2 to 2/3 fill of case with current bullet and primer.

Might be about 1500 fps for some really light plinking practice.

Chronograph anything you do, including that first load.
And BTW, aren't you supposed to start low and work up, not the other way around?

Maybe you will be publishing all this in a gunrag, need chrono data for that. tu2


All I did was find a 50,000 PSI load??? Was that a mistake? I thought it was somewhere close to the load we used to fireform the first cases but maybe I am wrong - I will dig through the thread and double check. On the upside I had no trouble extracting and the primers look fine so maybe I just got lucky?

Thanks again for all the great info and help -- if I ever write the magazine article I hope you will be ready to fly down to TX and help me get it all together - or err maybe I'll come to Kentucky! beer

I will bring my chronograph next outing and get the data.
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Just yanking your chain, since you are going down on the powder charge maybe.

Maybe you just need a faster powder to start low with and build up, using 300-grainers.

Varget ought to be ideal for 400-grainers, start low and work up.
Great with 300-grainers too.
I use Varget in the 404 Jeffery with all bullet weights from 300 to 400 grains. My favorite there.

No qualms about 50K psi loads for starting, but how do we know other than QuickLOAD?
Need the chronograph to verify nearness to reality, short of actual pressure testing ...

Keep up the good work. beer
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
...64.7 grains of H322: 92% fill, 100% burn, 2529 fps, 49,965 psi
300-grain Hornady FP
F-215, or CCI 250, or WLRM, take your pick of primer, any "Large Rifle Magnum Primer."
COAL: 3.123"
Crimp lightly or don't crimp.


RIP -- I was sure that the fire-forming load was near 50K PSI, and this confirms that, so all I did was find a load with Varget that was at 50K???

I am still a damned greenhorn and don't want to explode my gun (especially after so much time and work), and I like my arms and face (well, kinda), right the way they are, so I thought I made a reasonable guess on the 300g Varget load?

Anyways, I am glad you kept cool through all of my learnin ups and downs and got me to this point, still alive, with everything attached, with an awesome rifle that I am grateful to have.
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Also,

I loaded a few rounds with 400g Woodleighs that I wanted to try out -- 66g Varget, 2165 FPS, 51021 PSI, 4162-ft lbs (according to QuickLoad), which I thought would be the equivalent of the 300g Hornady loads in terms of energy (recoil)?

Wondered what your thoughts might be?
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
OK I didn't see your last post until just now -- what the heck??????

You answered my questions before I asked them! tu2
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
CHRONOGRAPH REPORT




Even with a 25-lb weight on the Lead Sled, it still kicks like a Mule and moves that Lead Sled - but at least I made it through the loaded ammo I had! Eeker


The two cases lower right I did not load for this session.

I like both loads just where they are, and they both print surprisingly close to each other at 50-yards.

No scope adjustments from last week...

In the black are the first 8 shots (300g Hornady) on the print out. The five shots low and in the white are the last five shots (400g)of the day.


There are 8-shots here...

I know I need to improve my bench technique but I believe that will come with more gettin' used to the recoil of this thing - I hope rotflmo

Edit 5 FEB: RIP cases weigh 234.57g - Quick Karl cases weigh 242.29g. All cases cleaned, sized, trimmed to 2.540". May account for some anomalies in the data strings - good chance I mixed things up here and there because of my focus on recoil abatement... I will be much for methodical next trip out.
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
I have quantities of H414 and H322 and I am interested in hearing thoughts on the use of those powder in this rifle.

Sometimes I think that only RIP ever reads this thread... Big Grin
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
This load shows real promise, they want to go into one hole, you just have to let them:


quote:
Originally posted by Quick Karl:


There are 8-shots here...




That chronograph data is reassuring.
QuickLOAD underestimated the velocity for the 300-grainer, but was very close to reality on the 400-grainer.

I like both loads.
You should not worry about pressure until you get over 2700 fps with the 300 grainer, and over 2300 fps with the 400-grainer.
Then you will be approaching max loads.

But those two loads you have, both around 50 Kpsi, do look like a good combo, like having .375 H&H and a 450/400 Nitro Express loads from one rifle.
That will take care of anything needin' doin'.
Though not necessary, if you want you can have a .375 Wby/.416 Rigby combo of load ballistics for that rifle too, for stunt shooting purposes. Wink

I would zero the 400-grainer at 100 yards.
First just adjust the scope so it is dead-on at 25 yards.
Should be very close to dead-on again at 100 yards.
Then see how high the 300-grainers land at 100 yards with same scope setting.

You have room to tweak either load, aiming at dead-on with the 400-grainer at 100 yards, and 2 to 3 inches high with the 300-grainer at 100 yards.

It does look like your "QK" brass adds about 20 fps to the 400-grainer MV, as compared to the "RIP" brass.
Time to make some more brass and stick with one brass weight/internal capacity for big-bore-benchrest competition with yourself.
It is all about "personal best."
Doing good has no end.
When you can't do any better just keep doing good. tu2


Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
https://home.nra.org/
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Quick Karl:
I have quantities of H414 and H322 and I am interested in hearing thoughts on the use of those powder in this rifle.


H322 would be great in the 404 ExpFNB with 300-grainers.
That was my pick from the start for your 300-grain-bullet loads.
Start with 65 grains of H322 and work up to 2700 fps with the 300-grain bullet, 1/2-grain or 1-grain increments of powder, your choice.
70.0 grains ought to be about max, unless QuickLOAD is as bad on this as it was with the Varget and 300-grainers for predicted velocity.
Might be faster than expected, lots vary, etc.

I have had great results with H322 in the 400 Whelen and in the 12.7x68mm Magnum (.500/.338 Lapua Magnum Improved),
using light bullets of 300 to 360 grains in those.

I forgot what primer you are using.
Keep using the same one for this load trial too. tu2

I think you better stick with Varget for the 400-grainers. I would!

Both H322 and Varget are excellent powders, extruded and temperature insensitive (Thermo-Ballistic-Insensitivity = TBI, this kind of TBI can prevent the other kind of TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury).
I do not use ball powders in big bores.
But I do not see anything wrong with 105%/compressed loads of the Hodgdon Extreme line of powders, like H322 and Varget, etc.

Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
https://home.nra.org/
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
A small gun shop just a few miles away had some Varget so I am going to stick with that for the time being.
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It appears Varget will do it all in your cartridge.

But, H4895 is the go-to powder for 400-grainers in the 400 Whelen.
It will be a good one to try if you get the chance.
It is intermediate in speed between the faster H322 and the slower Varget.
It is also EXTREME-ly TBI.

The approximately 2150 fps Varget load with the 400-grain Woodleigh ought to work wonders with your gas-checked cast lead boolit.
Use Lyman No. 2 alloy and you will have a great hunting bullet. tu2




Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
https://home.nra.org/
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, I just kinda got some bad news today on this rifle -- it turns out that the old gunsmith I got this thing from never did any of the magazine work required to make it work the right way, so now I have to find someone to alter the magazine, and I am just so tired that I don't even want to do it...
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
OK, did you sleep on it last night Karl?
Got your energy back?
Just a feed job needed.
There are very few rifles in the world with ideal magazine boxes.
Most are make-do with tricks done to the feed rails, ramps and even windowing of the boxes.
All the exalted makers of .416 Rigby and wider-bodied chamberings have shoe-horned the cartridges into boxes too narrow.
You can make that M98 function well with a shortened .375 H&H belted basis like on the 404 Express FNB.
It is a great thing that the action length does not need to be opened up to .375 H&H length.

Every 550 Magnum rifle that CZ makes for .416 Rigby and bigger cartridges uses a too-narrow box.
The 404 Jeffery is the biggest thing that fits the "Mauser Cosine Law" for box width in a CZ 550 Magnum.
Ditto Dakota, etc.

Yes, you need a competent gunsmith if you are not one.
Onward.

Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
https://home.nra.org/
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RIP:
OK, did you sleep on it last night Karl?
Got your energy back?
Just a feed job needed.
There are very few rifles in the world with ideal magazine boxes.
Most are make-do with tricks done to the feed rails, ramps and even windowing of the boxes.
All the exalted makers of .416 Rigby and wider-bodied chamberings have shoe-horned the cartridges into boxes too narrow.
You can make that M98 function well with a shortened .375 H&H belted basis like on the 404 Express FNB.
It is a great thing that the action length does not need to be opened up to .375 H&H length.

Every 550 Magnum rifle that CZ makes for .416 Rigby and bigger cartridges uses a too-narrow box.
The 404 Jeffery is the biggest thing that fits the "Mauser Cosine Law" for box width in a CZ 550 Magnum.
Ditto Dakota, etc.

Yes, you need a competent gunsmith if you are not one.
Onward.

Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
https://home.nra.org/


LOL Thanks, bro! wave

The guy at Swift bullets says that their Blackburn 17, 17X, or 26 bottom metal, should work...

But there is still a feed job to do after that...

I'm just going to give this thing a rest for a while, and shoot something else!
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
On the upside - the barrel cleans up quicker than any that I have ever owned except for my Schneider polygon AR15 barrel that cleans so fast it is as if it doesn't get fouled, at all...

When I say clean, I mean no copper fouling, at all.

Surprising!

I am still trying to figure out what to do with my magazine box.
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Don Markey made the front and rear sight inserts for me:



Thank you Don, they are perfect!

My first time ever fitting a dovetail (I left them extra wide so I could file the width once I had them fit)! I still have to fit the rear insert, then file (site) them in, then finish sanding and blue them!
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Nice, my favorite front sight, a "patridge" or "sourdough" with plenty of height for filing. tu2

I do hope you plan to do some flat-topped, square-notched rear sight filing too.
Then it will shoot like a combat handgun at close range, leveled and centered in the notch,
and you can hold the front higher for long shots, the way Elmer did it. tu2 tu2

Blacking or painting the front sight rear slope white or red or fluorescent?

Riflecrank Internationale Permanente
NRA Life Benefactor and Beneficiary
https://home.nra.org/
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Yep - a square notch rear, like my 1911, is my plan! tu2

I've never found a coating, or a color, that I like on a front sight. It seems they all have their weak points to my eyes. Maybe white?

If I'd had thought of it sooner I would have asked for a pocket to be milled for tritium inserts Big Grin
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Gun is dead.

Cannot justify half to full cost of a Satterlee action to have the Blackburn bottom metal I bought, fit to my action and have the magazine well milled to match the interior profile of the Blackburn magazine box (yes, I got a quote like that).

Alternatively, I am not willing to experimenting on it only to wind up with a paperweight.

Chalk it up to experience - buy a Remington M700! tu2
 
Posts: 4156 | Location: Hell | Registered: 22 August 2010Reply With Quote
new member
posted Hide Post
What an interesting thread!

I hope that Quick Karl gets the rifle finished some day - helluva story!

Cool
 
Posts: 22 | Location: I Hate Texas | Registered: 08 February 2017Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by The Zen Master:
What an interesting thread!

I hope that Quick Karl gets the rifle finished some day - helluva story!

Cool


Ditto!

fishing

Riflecrank Internationale Permanente cuckoo
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia