THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM VARMINT HUNTING FORUM


Moderators: Canuck
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
.20 tactical
 Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
If you had the choice between .20 tactical or .17 rem what would you go for?
 
Posts: 358 | Location: Wiltshire, UK | Registered: 09 June 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
First choice would be a .204 Ruger but from there .20 Tac because I like .20 cals better than .17s. Personal preference.........
 
Posts: 901 | Location: Denver, CO USA | Registered: 01 February 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Kory
posted Hide Post
I would go with the that Tac-20. About the same effective range, but more knock down power and less drift. I've also heard that some 17 Remington rifles foul pretty badly, but not all of them, just some.

Kory
 
Posts: 860 | Location: Montana | Registered: 16 August 2004Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of GreybeardBushman
posted Hide Post
I have a ruger .204, a 17 rem, a .222 rem and a .22-250 that are allused for foxes. the .17 Rem is great for minimum skin damage, the .204 is a bit harder overall, but is flat shooting as the .22-250.

I like all three calibres.
 
Posts: 728 | Location: The Wimmera, Victoria, Australia | Registered: 01 August 2005Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata  
 


Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia