The Accurate Reloading Forums THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading Walter's Own General Discussions Bolt action infantry rifles of World Wars I and IIGo | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply | |
| Bolt action infantry rifles of World Wars I and II | Login/Join |
| One of Us |
I'm uncertain whether the trenches of World War I or the desert war and Eastern Front of World War II was more abusive on bolt action infantry rifles. I have owned no bolt action rifle since my unfired Long Branch No.4 Mk. II (dated December 1954) that I bought from Springfield Sporters in the late 1970s. I'm unaware of any serious problem with reliability or maintainability with any World War I or II infantry rifle of any major participating country. Splitting hairs, I understand that British No. 4s, and No. 3s (of the Great War), were somewhat easier to keep shooting in mud and muck than other bolt actions because chambers and locking lug seats had easier access for cleaning out mud and filth. Beyond that, what are the weak spots and questionable design facets of boltd action infantry rifles of the World Wars? As a lefty, I've avoided bolt actions save for several years when I learned to shoot right-handed on a 1903 Springfield loaned to me by a friend - learning by dry firing and operating it from the shoulder while watching Western TV shows. It's so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it. Sam Levinson | ||
|
One of Us |
Read up on the Ross Model 1905. What force or guile could not subdue, Thro' many warlike ages, Is wrought now by a coward few, For hireling traitor's wages. | |||
|
| one of us |
Compare those rugged old rifles to all the complexity and small parts, including tiny springs of modern weapons. Gotta wonder how they would stand up under the combat conditions of yesterday ? Grizz Indeed, no human being has yet lived under conditions which, considering the prevailing climates of the past, can be regarded as normal. John E Pfeiffer, The Emergence of Man Those who can't skin, can hold a leg. Abraham Lincoln Only one war at a time. Abe Again. | |||
|
One of Us |
Like the man said to the gal on the beach "damned sand gets in everything." Never mistake motion for action. | |||
|
one of us |
I strongly recommend anyone interested in subjects like this go to Youtube and watch the "C & Asenal" series (yes, that's how it's spelled). The presenter is a fellow called Othias and there's a young woman that shoots the weapons at the end of each episode, theory being she is the height and weight of the average enlisted soldier of the era. Right now the concentration is on small arms of WWI. The is another series called the Great War that is exceptional as well. | |||
|
| One of Us |
Even before WWI, well before it in fact, the British NRA described the Ross as "a target rifle masquerading as a service arm". The real problem with the Ross was that Britain relaxed the cartridge specification for the .303 Mk VII so rounds that would have been previously rejected as out of tolerance were accepted. In the SMLE this wasn't an issue. In the Ross it proved terminal to the rifle. The major drawback of the Enfield (and I've shot them for forty-five years) is its poor bayonet mounting system on the SMLE. The No4 gets it right. In the Western Desert rifles were not lubricated if going into action but kept totally oil free and dried off. Dry sand runs off dry metal. | |||
|
| one of us |
Yes and the key to that is properly hardened metal with proper tolerances. Old Mausers with case hardened bolts and guide-ways are slick even when dry. Enfields are the same way. There is also generous clearance allowing for dirt.
| |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
The Accurate Reloading Forums THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS Guns, Politics, Gunsmithing & Reloading Walter's Own General Discussions Bolt action infantry rifles of World Wars I and II
Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia