THE ACCURATERELOADING.COM BIG BORE FORUMS

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Does anyone really NEED more gun than a 375 H&H?
Page 1 2 3 4 5 

Moderators: jeffeosso
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Does anyone really NEED more gun than a 375 H&H? Login/Join
 
One of Us
posted
This is not a knock against anything in the 4’s just a question. Seems like a 300 grain Barnes TSX would do everything you want to do?

Asking for a friend who’s considering a new gun.
 
Posts: 59 | Location: Atlanta, GA | Registered: 10 February 2010Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well Saeed has easily shot far more animals from very small through to elephant than anyone on AR and he has used for years a pair or 375/404 Improved, so basically a 375 RUM but his loads are backed off to about 2750 f/s with 300 grains so similar to 375 Wby.

I have never loaded for a 375 with the long 300 grain TSX but my guess would be with a powder like Reloader 15 then 2550 f/s or so should be around the money.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Michael Robinson
posted Hide Post
We had a great member once. His screen moniker was Oldsarge.

He wrote a piece he titled, and I may be paraphrasing now, “How Much Gun Is Enough Gun?” I don’t know if Oldsarge is still around, but I remember being impressed by his exposition and argument. Maybe the best I ever read.

Oldsarge’s answer, as I recall, and I stand to be corrected, was that bigger is definitely better, if the shooter can handle it.

My experience has backed that up, 100%.


Mike

Wilderness is my cathedral, and hunting is my prayer.
 
Posts: 13329 | Location: New England | Registered: 06 June 2003Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Michael Robinson:
We had a great member once. His screen moniker was Old Sarge.

He wrote a piece he titled, and I may be paraphrasing now, “How Much Gun Is Enough Gun?” I don’t know if Old Sarge is still around, but I remember being impressed by his exposition and argument. Maybe the best I ever read.

Old Sarge’s answer, as I recall, and I stand to be corrected, was that bigger is definitely better, if the shooter can handle it.

My experience has backed that up, 100%.


On Australia's biggest guns/hunting forum there are quite a few blokes who live in the Northern Territory. Plenty have said there is a big noticeable change with 500 J and also the 460 as compred to the 375 and 458. One bloke has a 460 and 500 Nitro and said the 460 is better but he also likes his 500 double.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of cal pappas
posted Hide Post
A .30-06 and a .375 are all anyone needs.
But, it's not what we need,it's what we want. That's why I hunt with a .600 much of the time.
Cal


_______________________________

Cal Pappas, Willow, Alaska
www.CalPappas.com
www.CalPappas.blogspot.com
1994 Zimbabwe
1997 Zimbabwe
1998 Zimbabwe
1999 Zimbabwe
1999 Namibia, Botswana, Zambia--vacation
2000 Australia
2002 South Africa
2003 South Africa
2003 Zimbabwe
2005 South Africa
2005 Zimbabwe
2006 Tanzania
2006 Zimbabwe--vacation
2007 Zimbabwe--vacation
2008 Zimbabwe
2012 Australia
2013 South Africa
2013 Zimbabwe
2013 Australia
2016 Zimbabwe
2017 Zimbabwe
2018 South Africa
2018 Zimbabwe--vacation
2019 South Africa
2019 Botswana
2019 Zimbabwe vacation
2021 South Africa
2021 South Africa (2nd hunt a month later)
______________________________
 
Posts: 7281 | Location: Willow, Alaska | Registered: 29 June 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cal pappas:
A .30-06 and a .375 are all anyone needs.
But, it's not what we need,it's what we want. That's why I hunt with a .600 much of the time.
Cal


Exactly. If shooting the big red roos in the spotlight with a 378 or 460 is a sin then I will be in hell for a long time Big Grin
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of crshelton
posted Hide Post
When silly questions like this appear, it becomes more obvious that some folks have gone stir crazy.


NRA Life Benefactor Member,
DRSS, DWWC, Whittington
Center,Android Reloading
Ballistics App at
http://www.xplat.net/
 
Posts: 2293 | Location: Republic of Texas | Registered: 25 May 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Well, since you said gun, how about a 12 gauge with 3 inch chambers.
 
Posts: 10608 | Location: Somewhere above Tennessee and below Kentucky  | Registered: 31 July 2016Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Use Enough Gun
posted Hide Post
rotflmo
 
Posts: 18517 | Registered: 04 April 2005Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
crshelton

posted 03 May 2020 15:08
When silly questions like this appear, it becomes more obvious that some folks have gone stir crazy.


He was asking for a friend Roll Eyes but I know what you mean. We are still in Lockdown here after several weeks, and very movement restricted. It's definitely becoming more difficult to stay confined. Been thinking a lot of all the shooting I'm missing.


Hunting.... it's not everything, it's the only thing.
 
Posts: 1992 | Location: New Zealand's North Island | Registered: 13 November 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
As strictly a North American game hunter, I assume some would consider anything over 338 Winchester excessive. I personally don't subscribe to that line of thought. I do have full faith in my 338 Winchester but fully enjoy my 375's and 416's. I don't know if one or the other makes anything any deader any quicker.
I do believe at times the larger bore and heavier bullet does provide more visual affect when the bullet makes contact. Though that is hard to quantify on shots where the game goes down near instantly.
Obviously by Saeed vast experiences a 375 is more than sufficient or adequate.



quote:
Originally posted by mstewart44:
This is not a knock against anything in the 4’s just a question. Seems like a 300 grain Barnes TSX would do everything you want to do?

Asking for a friend who’s considering a new gun.
 
Posts: 425 | Location: Wasilla, Alaska | Registered: 06 February 2006Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The only thing better than a 375 H&H is a 375 that fits into a standard action. Yes, I am fond of the 375 Ruger. 20 inch barrel goes from perfect to perfect and handy! The 375 is actually easier on small things than most of the manglems. take for instance coon and small feral pigs!
 
Posts: 692 | Location: South Central Texas | Registered: 29 August 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
In my opinion, the only folks who need more are elephant hunting PH’s and guides in elephant country.

As Taylor pointed out, the bigger bores do knock out or turn animals with slightly less than perfect shots.

Not needed if the client does his job, and not needed if the shooter is a perfect shot, but it’s a little more margin with screw ups at close range.

For a client, it pure want, as opposed to need.
 
Posts: 10478 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
It has been noted before that advances in bullet technology have extended the range and "punch" of nearly all the hunting calibers.
When I spend some time reading John Taylor, it is interesting to note how many cartridges he encountered that ruined their reputations based solely on improper bullet design.
Now that I am about to get back into the 9.3 game, I wonder if these might also be all that most of us need. Wonder if Saeed has ever necked down his .375/404 to .366.

Cool


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16306 | Location: Sweetwater, TX | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
mstewart44,

The answer to your questions is a resounding NO. Having said that I do think the 416's upward are just a bigger hammer but best reserved for the more experienced DG hunter. I've had more than one novice client take a rifle to Africa that they really weren't comfortable with and their experience was just what you might expect. I think there is far to much machismo associated with DG rifles. Hunters sometimes overload themselves thinking you need a cannon in order to have hunted.

I had a novice client that mentioned that recoil was an issue. I suggested a 375 with a break. His response was that would be "too gay". OK! He took a 416 Rigby and wounded every buffalo he shot at retrieving none.

Mark


MARK H. YOUNG
MARK'S EXCLUSIVE ADVENTURES
7094 Oakleigh Dr. Las Vegas, NV 89110
Office 702-848-1693
Cell, Whats App, Signal 307-250-1156 PREFERRED
E-mail markttc@msn.com
Website: myexclusiveadventures.com
Skype: markhyhunter
Check us out on https://www.facebook.com/pages...ures/627027353990716
 
Posts: 12842 | Location: LAS VEGAS, NV USA | Registered: 04 August 2002Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill/Oregon:
It has been noted before that advances in bullet technology have extended the range and "punch" of nearly all the hunting calibers.
When I spend some time reading John Taylor, it is interesting to note how many cartridges he encountered that ruined their reputations based solely on improper bullet design.
Now that I am about to get back into the 9.3 game, I wonder if these might also be all that most of us need. Wonder if Saeed has ever necked down his .375/404 to .366.

Cool


I can see logic in the 9.3 X 62 but I can't see any in the bullet diameter. You simply reduce the number of bullets available to you.
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Mike, you can get a wide variety of Woodleigh, Barnes, Nosler, Swift and Hornady bullets in .366, just to mention a few. No, not the selection you get in .375, but plenty good, I think.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16306 | Location: Sweetwater, TX | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill/Oregon:
Mike, you can get a wide variety of Woodleigh, Barnes, Nosler, Swift and Hornady bullets in .366, just to mention a few. No, not the selection you get in .375, but plenty good, I think.


Ok Bill. So I neck a 375 H&H to 366. I lose some bullet choice, what do I gain?
 
Posts: 7046 | Location: Sydney Australia | Registered: 14 September 2015Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Need? Probably not. Otherwise, the game depts. of the various African countries would not have allowed/settled mostly on that caliber as an acceptable minimum. But what does minimum mean? It means it will get the job done, safely, as in your question. So, there ya'go.

But 'minimum' also implies there is perhaps better. Otherwise the word 'minimum' would not be used in the legal description of calibers allowed for DG.

I've only taken two Buffalo with a 375H&H (300 gr.) but they were already dead when I approached and my PHs asked me to put in an insurance shot. The initial one shot killed both Buffalo. So, the 375 was certainly enough.

I have also taken five Buffalo with my 404 Jeffery and 458 Lott. I can't help but like and 'feel' these two calibers and bullets were better (400 gr. and 500 gr. respectively). No way to prove that, and I was happily impressed with my one shot kills on those two Buffalo with my 375. Gave me greater respect for the 375.

Need vs. like? For my hunting of Buffalo, here's what I like. A two rifle battery of a scoped 375 for long distance and an open sighted 40+ rifle for close-in. That, is my main use for a 375 on DG. YMMV.

For an expert opinion, Saeed and African PHs thoughts would carry MUCH more weight than mine obviously. The problem with that however, is the numerous various calibers all of these persons have chosen to carry themselves! And if the 375 is indeed enough, for every DG occasion, why do so many PHs carry larger bores? Food for thought I guess...
 
Posts: 2581 | Location: Colorado | Registered: 26 May 2010Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Bill/Oregon
posted Hide Post
Mike, no gain at all -- a slight loss in punch and a slight gain in ballistic coefficient. Just saying if you already have one of the 9.3s, you don't need to run out and buy a .375 H&H, which is a fabulous cartridge.


There is hope, even when your brain tells you there isn’t.
– John Green, author
 
Posts: 16306 | Location: Sweetwater, TX | Registered: 03 June 2000Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tomahawker
posted Hide Post
Karamojo shot Brontasaurus with a .177 pellet gun.
 
Posts: 3452 | Registered: 27 November 2014Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tanks
posted Hide Post
On elephants I think it makes a difference. You have to have the perfect shot placement as opposed to good shot placement. I would take a shoulder shot with a .500 caliber (and have taken it) on an elephant but would hesitate to do the same with a .375 H&H. Of course, because I haven't done it I can't be sure that it would not work. It is not a risk I would be willing to take unless someone else paid the trophy fee in case the animal was lost. Wink

Taylor said the same thing when I was re-reading his book the other day when discussing taking shoulder shots with calibers over .400.
 
Posts: 1083 | Location: Southern CA | Registered: 01 January 2014Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
The more game I have shot made me a believer in heavier for caliber bullets.

Then bigger bores what ever that means.

When standing in the thick stuff looking for a large critter that has taken a dislike to you.

A lot of rifles feel small.
 
Posts: 19314 | Location: wis | Registered: 21 April 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of BNagel
posted Hide Post
Does any man really NEED more gun than a 375 H&H?

Depends on the man.... sofa


_______________________


 
Posts: 4848 | Location: Clute, Texas | Registered: 12 January 2005Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
Actually, I would be very happy to hunt with my 30/404, anything that walks on the face of this earth.

But it is not legal.

So I use 375/404 just to be legal.

I have absolutely, positively, no doubts at all that it will kill any animal I shoot at.

I will leave the 600 Nitro Express for stupid idiots like Mark Sullivan to use! rotflmo


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 66762 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bill73
posted Hide Post
Why are people so fixated on the 375 H&H?real guns start at .4 anyways Big Grin


DRSS
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: MI | Registered: 20 March 2007Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bill73:
Why are people so fixated on the 375 H&H?real guns start at .4 anyways Big Grin


Might be true for those who cannot shoot straight, and hope the slightly bigger hole will make up for their disabilities! jumping


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 66762 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of tenmikemike
posted Hide Post
What does NEED have to do with it?? Big Grin


NRA Endowment Life member

CZ 550 American 9.3 X 62 Mauser/ Leupold VX-3 2.5-8 x 36
CZ 550 Safari Classic .458 Lott
 
Posts: 119 | Location: Phoenix AZ | Registered: 11 January 2009Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The more things I shoot with a 375 (H&H/WBY/RUM) the more impressed I am.

They just plain work.
 
Posts: 541 | Location: Mostly USA | Registered: 25 March 2011Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
I have rifles from 17 to 700.

I am also working on 12 and 14 calibers!

But for my hunting so called dangerous game, the 375/404 has served me, and many others, perfectly!


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 66762 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Bill73
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Saeed:
quote:
Originally posted by Bill73:
Why are people so fixated on the 375 H&H?real guns start at .4 anyways Big Grin


Might be true for those who cannot shoot straight, and hope the slightly bigger hole will make up for their disabilities! jumping


Smaller calibers for people who cannot handle the bigger ones dancing


DRSS
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: MI | Registered: 20 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of chuck375
posted Hide Post
Wrong forum, big bores start at 500

donttroll


Regards,

Chuck



"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"

Michael Douglas "The Ghost And The Darkness"
 
Posts: 4712 | Location: Colorado Springs | Registered: 01 January 2008Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crshelton:
When silly questions like this appear, it becomes more obvious that some folks have gone stir crazy.

yuck
 
Posts: 28032 | Location: KY | Registered: 09 December 2001Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
Perhaps,we can get Phil Shoemaker to chime in here.I don't remember his exact words but something like the 458 knocks the bears down faster and they stay down longer than with less powerful cartridges.
 
Posts: 46 | Registered: 05 March 2009Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by brair:
Perhaps,we can get Phil Shoemaker to chime in here.I don't remember his exact words but something like the 458 knocks the bears down faster and they stay down longer than with less powerful cartridges.


Another load of bloody bullshit! clap


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 66762 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
The gun you really NEED is the one you're totally comfortable with and can count on when the chips are down. The caliber is of secondary importance.
 
Posts: 1748 | Registered: 27 March 2007Reply With Quote
One of Us
Picture of Cold Trigger Finger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MARK H. YOUNG:
mstewart44,

The answer to your questions is a resounding NO. Having said that I do think the 416's upward are just a bigger hammer but best reserved for the more experienced DG hunter. I've had more than one novice client take a rifle to Africa that they really weren't comfortable with and their experience was just what you might expect. I think there is far to much machismo associated with DG rifles. Hunters sometimes overload themselves thinking you need a cannon in order to have hunted.

I had a novice client that mentioned that recoil was an issue. I suggested a 375 with a break. His response was that would be "too gay". OK! He took a 416 Rigby and wounded every buffalo he shot at retrieving none.

Mark



Not saying the 375 wouldn't have killed his buffalo like lightening. But the blame on this one is the blankety blank that didn't shoot his 416 enough to be able to hit well with it.
The 416 isn't a hard kicking rifle so the guy must have just plain not practiced.


Phil Shoemaker : "I went to a .30-06 on a fine old Mauser action. That worked successfully for a few years until a wounded, vindictive brown bear taught me that precise bullet placement is not always possible in thick alders, at spitting distances and when time is measured in split seconds. Lucky to come out of that lesson alive, I decided to look for a more suitable rifle."
 
Posts: 1934 | Location: Eastern Central Alaska | Registered: 15 July 2014Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by xausa:
The gun you really NEED is the one you're totally comfortable with and can count on when the chips are down. The caliber is of secondary importance.


Exactly.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 66762 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Phil Shoemaker : "I went to a .30-06 on a fine old Mauser action. That worked successfully for a few years until a wounded, vindictive brown bear taught me that precise bullet placement is not always possible in thick alders, at spitting distances and when time is measured in split seconds. Lucky to come out of that lesson alive, I decided to look for a more suitable rifle."



Another stupid and senseless statement!

What difference does the size of the bullet make if you cannot hit the animal in the right place?

I honestly cannot imagine how anyone can make such a statement.

Killing an animal one has to destroy vital organs.

The size of the bullet is totally immaterial.


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 66762 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
One of Us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by crshelton:
When silly questions like this appear, it becomes more obvious that some folks have gone stir crazy.


Shaken, not stirred please.
 
Posts: 213 | Registered: 05 October 2008Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

Accuratereloading.com    The Accurate Reloading Forums    THE ACCURATE RELOADING.COM FORUMS  Hop To Forum Categories  Rifles  Hop To Forums  Big Bores    Does anyone really NEED more gun than a 375 H&H?

Copyright December 1997-2023 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia