THE ACCURATE RELOADING POLITICAL CRATER

Page 1 2 

Moderators: Walterhog
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Imagine?? Login/Join 
one of us
posted



Quien Sabe,

GWB
 
Posts: 23547 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
One does not need any evidence beyond statistics in this election to smell a rat.


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
What a pair of very bad losers!

You two are supporters of the constitution, when it suits you.

Now you are supporting Flynn, who wants to have the USC flip the election results to suit the idiot who pardoned him.

Bloody hell, this is really becoming ridiculous.

Instead of saying lets put our differences away, and work for the good of all of us, you are putting more fuel on the fires of division, championed by Trump! clap


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 54406 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
How does one work with progressives?

Saeed you live in a very small society, lacking any diversity, you have no idea what you are talking about!

.
 
Posts: 38664 | Location: Crosby and Barksdale, Texas | Registered: 18 September 2006Reply With Quote
Administrator
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by JTEX:
How does one work with progressives?

Saeed you live in a very small society, lacking any diversity, you have no idea what you are talking about!

.


But I sure am having a good laugh at you lot.

Same as the rest of the world, who are so clueless they know nothing about America, and how its political system works.

But, they are providing us with untold hours of laughter.

Sleepy Joe is only temporary, Commie Kamala is going to be YOUR boss! rotflmo


www.accuratereloading.com
Instagram : ganyana2000
 
Posts: 54406 | Location: Dubai, UAE | Registered: 08 January 1998Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Your right Saeed but if this goes the way the "Socials" want it to go, your people will be right in the middle of it also !! Remember "the rain falls on the just and the unjust alike".
 
Posts: 264 | Location: NE Washington | Registered: 27 September 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
Maybe Glenn and Lane should be giving the Whitehouse a call. If its as obvious and easy to prove as you think Trumpy will be welcoming you with open arms.

Despite endless allegations of wrongdoing and numerous law suits strangely no substantive evidence has been forthcoming.
 
Posts: 5857 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
ARTICLE AND YOU NUTS ARE BULLSHIT.......

RESULTS FROM WAYNE COUNTY MICHIGAN WHICH INCLUDES ALL OF DETROIT

STRAIGHT PARTY VOTES--- DEM, 73.31 % ---- GOP, 25.12 %

PRESIDENT VOTE ......BIDEN, 68.32 % ---TRUMP, 30,27 %


NOW ACCORDING TO POWELL/TRUMPY NONSENSE FROM WHAT SHE IS SPEWING,,,,

THE DOMINION CHAVEZ, IRAN, VEN, CHINA, MACHINE ATTEMPTED TO

ELECT TRUMP BY SHIFTING ABOUT 5 % OF THE VOTE AWAY FROM BIDEN.......


BY HER REASONING (SHE SAID ALL MACHINES WERE HOOKED ONTO THE NET),

THAT NETWORK OF MACHINES MUST HAVE SWITCHED 5 % IN THE REST OF MICHIGAN ALSO...

GW, JT, SHOULD CHAVEZ/CHINA/IRAN/ETC HAVE SET IT AT 7 % ?????????.........

CAN YOU DO THE MATH, WOULD 7 HAVE WORKED, MAYBE 8....YUK YUK.......


..........................


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
And, you probably believe North Korean gunboats delivered ballots to a harbor in Maine too.

You're nuts.

quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
One does not need any evidence beyond statistics in this election to smell a rat.


-Our long national nightmare is over.

 
Posts: 10170 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
In my line of work...you prove things statically or it didn’t happen.

When you look at all the statically unlikely events that took place in this election...it should give everyone pause.

This election mathematically defied most all previous history.

Math does not lie. Just saying this election an actual statistical anomaly (possible) or it was and untoward event.


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
election an actual statistical anomaly (


IT IS NOT YOU DUMB SHIT;

EXAMPLE ABOVE- WAYNE COUNTY MI ,, HILLARY'S 2016 VOTE NEARLY THE SAME

AS THIS YEARS ,, 67 % FOR HILARY AND 30% FOR TRUMP..

MOST URBAN COUNTIES IN HE MIDWEST ALWAYS VOTE THAT LOPSIDED FOR DEMS



..


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yes, more vague, unsubstantiated bullshit from another crazy Trumptard.

You lost. Get over it.


quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
In my line of work...you prove things statically or it didn’t happen.

When you look at all the statically unlikely events that took place in this election...it should give everyone pause.

This election mathematically defied most all previous history.

Math does not lie. Just saying this election an actual statistical anomaly (possible) or it was and untoward event.


-Our long national nightmare is over.

 
Posts: 10170 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Yes, more vague, unsubstantiated bullshit from another crazy Trumptard.

You lost. Get over it.


quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
In my line of work...you prove things statically or it didn’t happen.

When you look at all the statically unlikely events that took place in this election...it should give everyone pause.

This election mathematically defied most all previous history.

Math does not lie. Just saying this election an actual statistical anomaly (possible) or it was and untoward event.


At least you didn’t try to explain the statistics. Wink


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Do you know that 95% of the votes are backed by paper ballots? Do you know those 95% show the same respective percentages as the remaining 5%.
How do we know this? The recounts
 
Posts: 6461 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Lane, what you call a statistical anomaly is not an anomaly at all. The following tells you why.

Rand Paul: "Trump margin of 'defeat' in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud?"
PolitiFact's ruling: Pants on Fire
Here's why: Republican Sen. Rand Paul suggested on Twitter that something suspicious — "statistical anomaly?" Fraud?" — happened in four states that President Donald Trump lost to his Democratic challenger, Joe Biden.

"Interesting ... Trump margin of 'defeat' in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself. (That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this)," the senator from Kentucky tweeted Nov. 29. His tweet included a link to a Nov. 24 analysis titled "Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020."
It's unclear who wrote that analysis Paul relied on; it is posted under the name "Vote Integrity" on a website called Substack. A separate Nov. 24 post under that same name says, "Welcome to vote_pattern_analysis by me, Vote P. Analysis."
State election officials have defended their electoral process and rejected claims about voter or election fraud.
We dug into the evidence Paul cited, and also looked at how states count and report votes. Paul said there was something "interesting" about the results reporting that suggested fraud; we found it easily explained by known vote-counting procedures.

Laws allow mail-in ballots to be counted past Election Day
Paul's tweet misstated an element of the analysis he promoted. His tweet said there were four "data dumps" in four states (he did not name the states). However, the analysis centered on four updates in three states: Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia. (Two of the updates were in Michigan.)
The post and Paul overlook the fact that in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia, absentee or mail-in ballots received by the time polls closed on Nov. 3 were legally allowed to be counted. The fact that workers were still counting ballots past midnight on Election Day is not indicative of fraud. States' specific rules and varying election procedures influenced the timing of results.
Wisconsin law, for example, bans clerks from tallying absentee ballots before Election Day.


Several municipalities in Wisconsin could not finish processing their absentee ballots by the time the polls closed at 8 p.m. on Election Day, so there was a delay in reporting those results to county clerks.
"This was especially true in major cities including Milwaukee, Green Bay and Kenosha, where final unofficial results were reported after 3 a.m." on Nov. 4, said a post on the Wisconsin Elections Commission website. (Milwaukee is Wisconsin's most populous city and tends to vote heavily for Democrats.)
Delayed reporting "does not mean something went wrong — it means election officials did their jobs and made sure every valid ballot was counted," said Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin's chief election official.
The report Paul shared "shows no awareness of the political geography of the states being analyzed," said Barry C. Burden, a political science professor and director of the Elections Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

"It is hardly surprising that large urban areas would take longer to count ballots and those ballots would favor Biden," Burden said. "Instead, the report treats the arrival of ballots in the early morning after the election as a mystery with no clear basis in the politics of the states being investigated."
 
Posts: 6461 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Yup. Reality is a bitch. Guys! The man lost! Get back to the real world-- that is the non-Trump fantasyland-- the rest of us are living in.

If you really do love this country as much as you claim, let's find whatever common ground we can and move forward. Good grief, this is a democracy, not a war.
 
Posts: 494 | Location: southern Wisconsin, USA | Registered: 08 January 2009Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
[quote]Laws allow mail-in ballots to be counted past Election Day[/quote


Same in MI and with 3 times as many mail in votes to count it takes longer.

And the law allowed them to be counted after election day, and the election

people didn't run out and report tallies every 15 min or every hour but at the end

of the days counting , hell they were constantly bothered by righty gop mobs wanting

to be in the building in Detroit, when the election board already had GOP observers.

this stupidity just made the process take longer,,,,,,,,,,,,,

IF THE FUCKING NUTS FIGURE FRAUD IN WAYNE COUNTY PUT UP THE MONEY AND RECOUNT LIKE IN WI...A

AS MI FOLKS WHO CARE WE ARE TIRED OF THE FRUITLOOPS BITCHING ABOUT DETROIT,

DO A RECOUNT OR STFU. THE NONSENSE BY OUR SENATE AND RUDY AND POWELL IS CRIMINAL.....ED HUBEL


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of nute
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Yes, more vague, unsubstantiated bullshit from another crazy Trumptard.

You lost. Get over it.


quote:
Originally posted by ledvm:
In my line of work...you prove things statically or it didn’t happen.

When you look at all the statically unlikely events that took place in this election...it should give everyone pause.

This election mathematically defied most all previous history.

Math does not lie. Just saying this election an actual statistical anomaly (possible) or it was and untoward event.


At least you didn’t try to explain the statistics. Wink


With respect Lane, thus far neither have you.

If you have and I missed it i apologise as Im not here as often as some.
 
Posts: 5857 | Location: Ban pre shredded cheese - make America grate again... | Registered: 29 October 2005Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote--This election mathematically defied most all previous history.


NO IT DID NOT YOU DUMB SHIT;

EXAMPLE --- WAYNE COUNTY MI ,, HILLARY'S 2016 VOTE NEARLY THE SAME

AS THIS YEARS ,, 67 % FOR HILARY AND 30% FOR TRUMP..

MOST URBAN COUNTIES IN THE MIDWEST ALWAYS VOTE THAT LOPSIDED FOR DEM


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
It gives me great pleasure to watch our loons have to switch from gloating to whining incessantly.
 
Posts: 13361 | Location: Iowa | Registered: 10 April 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Schrodinger:
Lane, what you call a statistical anomaly is not an anomaly at all. The following tells you why.

Rand Paul: "Trump margin of 'defeat' in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud?"
PolitiFact's ruling: Pants on Fire
Here's why: Republican Sen. Rand Paul suggested on Twitter that something suspicious — "statistical anomaly?" Fraud?" — happened in four states that President Donald Trump lost to his Democratic challenger, Joe Biden.

"Interesting ... Trump margin of 'defeat' in 4 states occurred in 4 data dumps between 1:34-6:31 AM. Statistical anomaly? Fraud? Look at the evidence and decide for yourself. (That is, if Big Tech allows u to read this)," the senator from Kentucky tweeted Nov. 29. His tweet included a link to a Nov. 24 analysis titled "Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020."
It's unclear who wrote that analysis Paul relied on; it is posted under the name "Vote Integrity" on a website called Substack. A separate Nov. 24 post under that same name says, "Welcome to vote_pattern_analysis by me, Vote P. Analysis."
State election officials have defended their electoral process and rejected claims about voter or election fraud.
We dug into the evidence Paul cited, and also looked at how states count and report votes. Paul said there was something "interesting" about the results reporting that suggested fraud; we found it easily explained by known vote-counting procedures.

Laws allow mail-in ballots to be counted past Election Day
Paul's tweet misstated an element of the analysis he promoted. His tweet said there were four "data dumps" in four states (he did not name the states). However, the analysis centered on four updates in three states: Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia. (Two of the updates were in Michigan.)
The post and Paul overlook the fact that in Michigan, Wisconsin and Georgia, absentee or mail-in ballots received by the time polls closed on Nov. 3 were legally allowed to be counted. The fact that workers were still counting ballots past midnight on Election Day is not indicative of fraud. States' specific rules and varying election procedures influenced the timing of results.
Wisconsin law, for example, bans clerks from tallying absentee ballots before Election Day.


Several municipalities in Wisconsin could not finish processing their absentee ballots by the time the polls closed at 8 p.m. on Election Day, so there was a delay in reporting those results to county clerks.
"This was especially true in major cities including Milwaukee, Green Bay and Kenosha, where final unofficial results were reported after 3 a.m." on Nov. 4, said a post on the Wisconsin Elections Commission website. (Milwaukee is Wisconsin's most populous city and tends to vote heavily for Democrats.)
Delayed reporting "does not mean something went wrong — it means election officials did their jobs and made sure every valid ballot was counted," said Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin's chief election official.
The report Paul shared "shows no awareness of the political geography of the states being analyzed," said Barry C. Burden, a political science professor and director of the Elections Research Center at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

"It is hardly surprising that large urban areas would take longer to count ballots and those ballots would favor Biden," Burden said. "Instead, the report treats the arrival of ballots in the early morning after the election as a mystery with no clear basis in the politics of the states being investigated."


Your article leaves out one part of the equation eluded to by Glenn and Senator Paul.

Yes...the “last minute mail-ins” were counted last. And I don’t dispute the legality of that. The rub lies in the percentage breakdown of those mail-ins. They were ~98% Biden. It is the unrealistic percent breakdown that pops the red-flag.

Then there are the bell-weather counties which have correctly picked the POTUS for ~100 years — all won by Trump.

Then there is the fact that with election day vote...which was quite high...Trump won every state in the union...with possible exceptions of NY and/or CA...last time I checked it wasn’t finally decided whether Trump won the election day vote in CA & NY. Only ever done recently by Reagan and never by a losing candidate.

There are others.


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Events deviate from norms. That is simply fact of life. These deviations aren’t evidence.

I warned, in fact guaranteed, you and others months ago that Trump wouldn’t go easily. You poo-pooed that. You and others in the crater said that if he tried anything, you wouldn’t support him. Well, as expected, you are pissing backwards.

Instead of your knee-jerk acceptance of anything that Trump says, this is the time for you to commit to a little self-examination. You really need to get mentally healthy. I hope that it’s possible.
 
Posts: 6461 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Schrodinger:
Events deviate from norms. That is simply fact of life. These deviations aren’t evidence.

I warned, in fact guaranteed, you and others months ago that Trump wouldn’t go easily. You poo-pooed that. You and others in the crater said that if he tried anything, you wouldn’t support him. Well, as expected, you are pissing backwards.

Instead of your knee-jerk acceptance of anything that Trump says, this is the time for you to commit to a little self-examination. You really need to get mentally healthy. I hope that it’s possible.


I don’t live in Portland. I am not the one mentally unhealthy. I live on a ranch in the country where sane people live. Wink

I just checked again...that “mail-in” vote that did it for Biden counted between 1:30 to 6am was not 98% Biden...I was wrong.

It was 99.4% for Biden. Statistically highly unlikely.


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Lane, I don’t believe what your saying. Exactly where was this 99% plus Biden voting? State? County? Precinct?
 
Posts: 6461 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
Doug,
To begin with...read this article. The article your earlier post was disputing and the one Senator Paul referenced in his Tweet.

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Dummie there is nothing wrong with the way the results came in,,,

as the counting centers counted and reported the extremely dem areas in those

urban centers first....then during the day the rest of those counties reported.

Example from the article for Wayne county, MI,,,

''An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows

141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump""

this is downtown Detroit with its first report, and that total is like what

those precincts report in all elections, extremely lopsided dem .. then as the rest of the counties

suburban precincts reported in , all during the rest of the counting process, the the tally for

biden ended up as 68% and for trump 30%.. About the same percentage, 67 %, hilary got in 2016

and the same percentage, 30%, trump got in 2016.. there was no fraud so STFU..

If you say fraud put up the money and recount Wayne County, if not STFU.....

...


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Lane, why aren’t Trump’s lawyers claiming fraud in any of their court actions?

Trump has sent out more fund raising letters in the 3 week period after the election than before the election. He has collected 207 million. The first $5,000 of any donation goes into a PAC that he recently established. Trump controls how that money is spent. Can you connect the dots? Have you sent your money?
 
Posts: 6461 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
WAYNE COUNTY, 2020,,

Precincts Reported: 1,115 of 1,115 (100.00%)

Registered Voters: 878,102 Voted of 1,406,355 Registered (62.44%)

Ballots Cast: 878,102
-------------
Joseph R. Biden/Kamala D.Harris DEM

171,041 Voted NOV 3 --- 426,129 ABSENTEE--- TOTAL--- 597,170 ---68.32%

Donald J. Trump/Michael R.Pence REP

133,238 Voted NOV 3 --- 131,315 ABSENTEE--- TOTAL---264,553 --- 30.27%

If the fascists think these are wrong put up bucks and recount...


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post


ya!

GWB
 
Posts: 23547 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Are you saying the tally is wrong in Wayne county.

Then put up the money for the hand recount,

otherwise take a flying fuck...and STFU...

Tell you what, we need to recount TX and I'd put up a thousand bucks

of it that all the rural counties in TX are not honest and that a

bunch of them rigged in extra votes for trump, cause nobody watches

them at all like the urban centers are watched and picked on..................

The prick GOV and his LT GOV you got would allow that, encourage that..............


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Schrodinger:
Lane, why aren’t Trump’s lawyers claiming fraud in any of their court actions?

Trump has sent out more fund raising letters in the 3 week period after the election than before the election. He has collected 207 million. The first $5,000 of any donation goes into a PAC that he recently established. Trump controls how that money is spent. Can you connect the dots? Have you sent your money?


I see you gave up on statistical anomalies. Wink

Which aren’t proof of anything...but should be red-flags to every red-blooded American.


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
Trump lost by over 7,000,000,000 votes. There's a red flag for you.

The statistical anomalies argument is just like every other argument being advanced on behalf of President Fuck-Tard: it exists only in the imaginations of his cult members.


-Our long national nightmare is over.

 
Posts: 10170 | Registered: 20 September 2012Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
statistical anomalies.


Asshole, That fits some of the results of rural TX counties...


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
TX had 58 counties over 85 % for trump..

TX had about a hundred over 80% .

Now those are such grievous anomalies that the TX supreme court or TX legislature,

should set aside the election and give electors to biden......

THESE COUNTIES SHOW REAL FASCISM/BALLOT STUFFING, IN ACTION...


AND YOU FASCISTS COMPLAIN ABOUT BIDEN GETTING 68% IN WAYNE COUNTY ,,MI..

..


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of Schrodinger
posted Hide Post
Lane, I haven’t “given up on the anomalies argument”. I’ve already pointed out that your “anomalies” aren’t anomalies. You can bray until you blow your brains out, but it’s not going to make it true.

But, I noticed that YOU didn’t answer why you are suggesting fraud, but Trump’s lawyers haven’t. Why is that?
 
Posts: 6461 | Location: Oregon  | Registered: 03 June 2018Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Trump lost by over 7,000,000,000 votes. There's a red flag for you.



Q for U??

I checked to see what the current Population of China was approximately on 12/4/20.

This is what came up on da' inna-net.



I've heard there is a book Titled "Chinese Population Explosion, by Wi Humpum Yung, and I've also heard that the Chinese are the actual owners of the Dominion Software........... but 7 Billion??????


So if Trump lost by 7,000,000,000 votes, that's a lot of manipulatin'"anomolies" goin' on out there.


Just sayin'

ya!

GWB
 
Posts: 23547 | Location: Pearland, Tx,, USA | Registered: 10 September 2001Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
If Trump lost by 7 billion votes, then yes, there was fraud.

7 million (probably what you meant) isn’t fraud level.

But any time something goes so one way, there is something odd there.

You can have difficulty proving just what is going on, but when over 5% routinely say “other” it looks weird.

quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Trump lost by over 7,000,000,000 votes. There's a red flag for you.

The statistical anomalies argument is just like every other argument being advanced on behalf of President Fuck-Tard: it exists only in the imaginations of his cult members.
 
Posts: 6366 | Location: Minnesota USA | Registered: 15 June 2007Reply With Quote
one of us
posted Hide Post
TX had 58 counties over 85 % for trump..

TX had about a hundred over 80% .

Now those are such grievous anomalies that the TX supreme

court or the TX legislature, should hold some rudy type hearings,

and thn should set aside the election and give electors to biden......

THESE COUNTIES SEEM TO SHOW REAL FASCISM/BALLOT STUFFING, GOING BY ANOMALIES,

AND YOU FASCISTS COMPLAIN ABOUT BIDEN GETTING 68% IN WAYNE COUNTY IN MI...


MZEE WA SIKU
 
Posts: 25929 | Registered: 03 February 2003Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mike Mitchell:
Trump lost by over 7,000,000,000 votes. There's a red flag for you.

The statistical anomalies argument is just like every other argument being advanced on behalf of President Fuck-Tard: it exists only in the imaginations of his cult members.


Math must have not been your strong point in college. Wink


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
one of us
Picture of ledvm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Schrodinger:
Lane, I haven’t “given up on the anomalies argument”. I’ve already pointed out that your “anomalies” aren’t anomalies. You can bray until you blow your brains out, but it’s not going to make it true.

But, I noticed that YOU didn’t answer why you are suggesting fraud, but Trump’s lawyers haven’t. Why is that?


Did I ever use the word fraud? In fact the article I cited stated that anomalies are not proof of fraud. But, make no mistake about it...this election had several incidents which fell significantly outside the statistical norm. As an American...you too should be wanting those anomalies investigated and explained.


____________

Lane

Progressives don’t just have disdain for Conservatives...they loathe the very ground they walk on.
 
Posts: 27959 | Location: Gainesville, TX | Registered: 24 December 2006Reply With Quote
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 


Copyright December 1997-2020 Accuratereloading.com


Visit our on-line store for AR Memorabilia